عربي
Home


The Fatwa Approach Adopted at the General Ifta' De



Iftaa' Department


The Fatwa Approach Adopted at the General Ifta' Department

Issues of Fiqh (or Islamic jurisprudence) are variable, addressing all practices of people in all life aspects. Muslim scholars wrote down numerous Islamic provisions and legislations allowing the divine wisdom to illuminate people's lives. Those provisions have a solid base for their legislative and jurisprudence stemming from the basic legislation sources: the Holy Quran, Sunnah, Consensus, Analogy and common benefits. This Fiqh heritage has been collected in four Islamic schools of thought (Madhaheb): Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi'i and Hanbali. It is agreed upon those schools (madhaheb), and they are accepted as the path to achieve Allah's blessings and to protect the welfare of people and countries.
Since the General Department of Al Ifta' has been a part of the scientific progress for the general Fiqh movement, it decided to adopt one of those four schools as a base for its Fatawa (answers) in order to achieve the benefits and goals of the Fiqh movement in the Islamic history. Those goals include:
1.  Being safe with Allah and in the Day of Judgment by not changing anything permitted by Allah in Islam.
2. Achieving moderation which is a fundamental in the Islamic Shari’a and has been a constant in the heritage of the Islamic Fiqh.
3. Avoiding contradicting sayings and abnormal views which may cause flaws in practical and intellectual life.
4. Regulating fatwa and eliminating useless disagreements as much as possible. 
5. Assisting Muftis (people who provide Fatwa) to learn the Islamic legislations easily as it may take a life time for a Mufti to study and give fresh rulings on every issue he is asked about. Thus, learning the fatwa of previous muftis is an inevitable solution.
Al Iftaa Department has chosen the school of Al Imam Al Shafi'i as a base to which it refers in providing fatwa for two reasons:
1. It is the most common school (Madhhab) in our countries in history. Following the majority and what is common is a goal.
2. It is a moderate school/Madhhab gathering between the foundations of schools of thought and hadith. This Madhhab originated Fiqh innovations which have been and still a cause in achieving the interests of the nation and unifying Muslims. Noteworthy that this cause has been achieved by other schools/Madhaheb but Al Imam Al shafi'i’s school/Madhhab has been leading in this field.
The Department of Ifta'a's commitment to this Madhhab doesn't mean absolute imitation of all the innovations of the Faqihs (experts in Islamic jurisprudence), but the department has its advanced approach in benefiting from all items and topics in other schools/madhaheb taking into consideration the following:
1. If the case is related to a contemporary issue not mentioned in previous fatwa/innovations by Faqihs, or if it is one of the general topics important to the society or the nation as a whole, either in financial transactions, medical issues or others, then Al Iftaa Department must prepare special studies to research the issue within the frame of the evidence in the Shari’a law and Fiqh rules. In addition, it tries to balance the cons and pros to conclude a fatwa to be presented to the Iftaa Council. The Council holds discussions in order to reach a decision about the needed issue.
2. If the innovation of the Shafi'i Madhhab concerning a certain issue was not corresponding to the changing time, place and conditions in the time when the question is raised for the Mufti, this matter may cause troubles. The Department of Al Iftaa re-searches the question in line with the Fiqh rules and Shari’a goals benefiting from the innovations of all Islamic schools/Madhaheb in order to issue the fatwa which is the closest to the Shari’a rules and purposes.
3. In personal status or issues like marriage, divorce, heritage and custody of children, the Department of Ifta'a refers to the Jordanian Personal Status Law in its Fatwas to avoid any difference between Iftaa and Legitimate Law in the Kingdom. The law however is based on the innovations and opinions of Muslim Faqihs, selected according to Shari’a disciplines by specialized committees.
In that ways the muftis deal with the questions sent to them through different communication methods, according to regulated and coordinated steps starting from identifying the type of question and ending with sending the answer as soon as possible. However, any delay might be caused by the detailed study for tens of issues handled by Al Iftaa Department on a daily basis especially that Muftis know that they will be asked by Allah about every word they write, thus they prefer not to be hasty in issuing fatwa and answering questions.  

Summarized Fatawaa

My husband wanted to sell a piece of land that was his own, but his father insisted that he transfer the land in his (the father’s) name so that he could sell it at a higher price. Then, my husband and his father would split the price. After my father-in-law sold the land, he denied everything and refused to acknowledge my husband’s right. My father-in-law passed away a year ago, and my husband’s brothers divided the inheritance, refusing to acknowledge that this land was a trust held by their father for my husband until it was sold. Are they sinful for knowingly denying that the land belongs to my husband, and what is the ruling on praying against them?
 
 
 
 
 

All perfect praise be to Alalh, The Lord of The Worlds, and may His Peace and Blessings be upon our Prophet Muhammad and upon all of his family and companions.
Among the rights of the deceased upon their heirs are: preparing them for burial at death, settling their debts, returning people’s rights to them, executing their will, and then dividing their estate. What was mentioned in the question falls under the rights of others, even if they are among the heirs, and the deceased is not absolved of it unless it is returned to its rightful owners. This is because Allah, Almighty, forbids consuming others' wealth/properties unjustly. However, do not give up on seeking a solution by involving righteous and well - respected individuals who may have influence over them, in the hope that Allah guides them to goodness and correctness. As for supplicating against them, the prayer of the oppressed is not rejected, even if the oppressed person is not a Muslim. And Allah knows best.
 
 
 
 
 

Is it permissible for a woman who has become pure before the end of forty days of confinement to perform different acts of worship? and is it lawful for her husband to have sex with her?

Once postpartum bleeding ceases and she is certain that it won`t happen again, she becomes pure, and so she should perform Ghusl (ritual bath), pray, and fast. She can also have sex with her husband even before the end of (40) days because the minimum of postpartum bleeding is a moment, and the maximum is (60) days. However, the postpartum bleeding for the majority of women is (40) days, but this does not apply to rest of them.

We collect funds from mosques and other sources, saying: "For the poor, the needy, widows, orphans, and those who do not beg insistently." After paying the stipends of the families registered with the Zakat Committee, an amount exceeding 6,000 dinars remained. Is it permissible for me to save it for upcoming months when I may not be able to collect the stipends?

These funds are received by the committee as representatives of the zakat payers to deliver zakat to those entitled to it. It is well-known that delaying zakat while being able to pay it is not permissible. Imam Al-Nawawi (may Allah have mercy on him) said: "Zakat must be paid immediately if one is able to do so, by the presence of wealth and the eligible categories." [Al-Minhaj] Therefore, the committee must distribute the zakat to the eligible recipients without installment payments or using it to purchase material goods for them, as the committee does not have authority over the poor to allocate it in this way. And Allah Knows Best.

Is the Saum (Fasting) of someone who ate and drank forgetfully while offering fasting of oath expiation invalidated?

Whosoever eats, or drinks forgetfully is exempted by Allah; therefore, he/she shouldn`t break their fast whether it was obligatory, non-obligatory, or expiatory. And Allah Knows Best.

See More