عربي
Home


The Fatwa Approach Adopted at the General Ifta' De



Iftaa' Department


The Fatwa Approach Adopted at the General Iftaa' Department

The questions of Islamic jurisprudence are many and varied, and they touch every sphere of life and every human practice. The scholars of Islam have left us a vast legacy of rulings and legislation that illuminates people’s lives with the light of divine wisdom. Their juristic and legislative choices rest on a firm foundation of recognized sources of law: the Qur’an, the Sunnah, consensus, analogy, and considerations of public interest.

This juristic heritage has settled into four recognized schools of Islamic thought: the Ḥanafī, the Mālikī, the Shāfiʿī, and the Ḥanbalī. There is consensus that they are to be adopted and regarded as valid paths to attaining the pleasure of Allah the Mighty and Majestic and to safeguarding the interests of the land and its people.

Since the General Iftaa`Department is one link in the scholarly chain of the broader juristic movement, it chose to adopt one of the four schools as the point of departure and foundation for the juristic positions on which it issues fatwas. Through this adoption, it seeks to secure the great benefits and interests that the juristic movement has realized throughout Islamic history, foremost among them:

1. Safety before Allah the Mighty and Majestic on the Day of the Great Reckoning, so that we do not alter or change anything in Allah’s religion without His leave.

2. Realizing moderation, which is among the foundations of the Islamic Sharīʿah and one of the distinguishing features of this vast juristic legacy.

3. Safety from inconsistent opinions and anomalous views that cause disorder in intellectual and practical life.

4. Ensuring discipline in the issuance of fatwas and reducing unproductive disagreement as far as possible.

5. Helping muftis arrive at the Sharīʿah rulings by the easiest route. A lifetime would not suffice for a mufti who sought to exercise full ijtihād on every question put before him, so drawing upon earlier jurists is the indispensable solution.

The General Iftaa` Department chose the school of Imam al-Shāfiʿī as the foundation and point of departure for fatwas in our blessed land, for two reasons:

First: it is the most widespread school in our country throughout history, and taking account of the majority is an objective of the Sharīʿah.

Second: it is a moderate school that combined the principles of the school of ḥadīth and that of considered opinion. It produced juristic conclusions that have been, and remain, a means of serving the interests of the Ummah and uniting its word. Although this quality is found in the other schools as well, the school of Imam al-Shāfiʿī took the lead in it.

The Department’s commitment to issuing fatwas according to the Shāfiʿī school does not mean complete taqlīd (to follow the opinion of a scholar without knowing the evidence on which it is based) to the conclusions of the school’s jurists. Rather, the Department has an advanced approach to benefiting from the full range of positions of all the schools, within the following parameters:

1. New contemporary issues (nawāzil). If a matter concerns a new development of the age not addressed in the jurists’ rulings, or is a general matter affecting society or the entire Ummah, whether in financial transactions, medical issues, or other areas, the Department must prepare dedicated studies examining it in light of the Sharīʿah evidence and legal maxims, and weighing benefits against harms. It arrives at a Sharīʿah ruling that is presented to the Iftaāʾ Board for deliberation, leading to a formal decision on the matter.

2. Where the Shāfiʿī position no longer suits changed circumstances. If the Shāfiʿī position on a particular question does not suit changes of time, place, and the circumstances surrounding the questioner, for example where it would cause severe hardship or extreme difficulty, or where the underlying reason for which the Shāfiʿī jurists stipulated the position has changed, or where new scientific information or facts call for revisiting the juristic choice, in all these cases the Department re-examines the question in light of the legal maxims and the objectives of the Sharīʿah. It draws on the conclusions of all the Islamic schools to reach the ruling closest to the Sharīʿah’s objectives.

3. Personal status matters. In matters such as marriage, divorce, child custody, and inheritance, the Department relies on the Jordanian Personal Status Law and does not depart from it, so as to avoid any conflict between the Iftaāʾ institution and the Sharīʿah judiciary in the Kingdom. The law draws on the conclusions and opinions of Muslim jurists, selected on sound Sharīʿah principles and criteria by specialized committees.

Thus, the esteemed muftis handle the questions that reach them from the public through various channels, within a graduated sequence and a precise mechanism. It begins by determining which of the above categories the question falls under, and ends with the answer reaching the questioner as quickly as possible. Where delay occurs, it is only because of the detailed study the Department undertakes for dozens of questions each day. A mufti who knows that he is answerable before Allah the Mighty and Majestic for every word he writes will undoubtedly prefer deliberation and care over haste and hurried judgment.

And Allah is the Granter of success.

  

Summarized Fatawaa

Is it valid for the 'aqīqah to be performed using the newborn child's own wealth?

All praise is due to Allah, and may peace and blessings be upon our Master, the Messenger of Allah.
It is not permissible for the guardian to perform the 'aqīqah using the newborn child's own wealth, because the 'aqīqah is a voluntary act of giving (tabarru'), and a guardian is prohibited from making voluntary expenditures from the child's wealth. Should he do so, he becomes financially liable for what he spent. And Allah Almighty knows best.

What is the difference between Qiyam al-Layl and Tahajjud?

● Qiyam al-Layl refers to any voluntary prayer performed at night, including Tarawih.
● Tahajjud specifically refers to voluntary prayer performed at night after waking up from sleep.
Glad tidings to those who combine both, as numerous Quranic verses and hadiths mention their virtues.
Allah Almighty says {what means}: "And rise from thy sleep and pray during part of the night [as well], as a free offering from thee, and thy Sustainer may well raise thee to a glorious station [in the life to come." [Al-Isra`/79]
The Prophetﷺ said: "Whoever stands (in prayer) during Ramadan with faith and seeking reward, all their past sins will be forgiven." [Agreed upon]

What is the ruling on congratulating others on the arrival of Ramadan?

Congratulating others on the arrival of Ramadan is permissible.
If someone does it to express their love for worship and the blessings of Ramadan, and congratulates their fellow Muslim, they have done something good.
The Prophet ﷺ said: "Shall I not tell you something that, if you do it, you will love one another? Spread peace (Salam) among yourselves." [Narrated by Muslim]
Giving Salam is a prayer for peace and safety.

The Jurisprudential Significance of the Ḥadīth: "Whoever says, at the conclusion of the Fajr Prayer, while crossing his legs, before speaking..."
"Whoever says, at the conclusion of the Fajr prayer, while crossing his legs, before speaking: 'Lā ilāha illā Allāh, waḥdahu lā sharīka lah, lahu al-mulku wa lahu al-ḥamdu yuḥyī wa yumītu wa huwa ʿalā kulli shayʾin qadīr' ten times — ten good deeds will be recorded for him, ten bad deeds will be erased from him, he will be raised ten levels, he will spend that day in protection from everything disliked and guarded from the devil, and no sin will be able to befall him on that day except associating partners with Allah" — does this noble ḥadīth apply to the imam, and what is meant by "extraneous speech"?

All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master the Messenger of Allah ﷺ.
It is recommended for both the imam and those praying behind him to recite, immediately after the final salām, the specific remembrance reported in the sunnah to be said before turning away from one's place of prayer. The imam then leaves his praying spot, and the act of "turning" is fulfilled when the imam faces the congregation — even without physically leaving his spot — by positioning his right side toward them and his left side toward the qiblah, and this applies even while he is engaged in supplication.
Al-ʿAllāmah Ibn Qāsim al-ʿAbbādī states in his Ḥāshiyah ʿalā al-Tuḥfah (Vol.2/P.105): "It is most virtuous for the imam, once he has given the salām, to rise from his place of prayer immediately afterward." He adds that an exception must be made for the remembrances that are specifically required to be recited before he turns away. He then notes, citing Sharḥ al-ʿUbāb: "Yes, an exception to this rising immediately after the salām applies to the Fajr prayer, due to the authentic report that the Prophet ﷺ, when he prayed Fajr, would remain seated until the sun rose." He further cites, from al-Khādim, the ḥadīth concerning one who recites, at the conclusion of the Fajr prayer while still in the position of crossing his leg to rise: "Lā ilāha illā Allāh, waḥdahu lā sharīka lah..." and the rest of the well-known ḥadīth. He comments that this makes explicit that this particular remembrance is to be recited before the worshipper turns his legs to leave, and the same applies to Maghrib and ʿAṣr, as reported in those contexts as well.
What is meant by "speech" in the relevant ḥadīth is extraneous worldly speech that is not called for after the prayer and for which there is no legitimate excuse. The remembrances reported to be recited upon concluding the prayer, however, do not fall under this category of extraneous speech, since they are themselves required by the sharīʿah.
Al-ʿAllāmah ʿAlī al-Shabrāmalsī states in his Ḥāshiyah ʿalā al-Nihāyah (Vol.1/P.551): "If someone greets a person with salām while he is occupied with reciting this remembrance [i.e., 'Lā ilāha illā Allāh...'], should he return the greeting — without this causing him to forfeit the promised reward, since he is engaged in an obligatory matter — or should he delay returning the greeting until he finishes, this being a legitimate excuse for the delay?" He continues: "I say: the more likely view is the former, and the prohibition on speech is to be understood as applying to extraneous speech for which there is no legitimate excuse. Based on this, should the worshipper give precedence to this remembrance ('Lā ilāha illā Allāh...') or to reciting Sūrat al-Ikhlāṣ ('Qul huwa Allāhu aḥad')? This requires consideration, though it is not unlikely that the remembrance takes precedence, given that the Lawgiver urged hastening to it through his words 'while crossing his leg.' This is not considered ordinary speech, since it is not extraneous to what is required after the prayer."
Accordingly, it is recommended for both the imam and those praying behind him to recite this remembrance and to give it precedence over the other remembrances of the prayer, ensuring it is said before they move from their place. And Allah the Almighty knows best.

See More