Resolutions of Iftaa' Board



Resolutions of Iftaa' Board

قرار رقم: (272) مقبرة قرية الطنيب

Date Added : 11-03-2019

قرار رقم: (272) (5 / 2019) مقبرة قرية الطنيب

بتاريخ (30/جمادى الآخرة/1440هـ) الموافق (7 / 3/ 2019م)

 

الحمد لله رب العالمين، والصلاة والسلام على سيدنا محمد، وعلى آله وصحبه أجمعين، وبعد

فإن مجلس الإفتاء والبحوث والدراسات الإسلامية في جلسته الثالثة المنعقدة يوم الخميس (30/جمادى الآخرة/1440هـ)، الموافق (7/3/ 2019م) قد نظر في الكتاب الوارد من معالي وزير الأوقاف والشؤون والمقدسات الإسلامية (رقم 4/6 /2 /14037، تاريخ 25/11/ 2018م) حيث جاء فيه: إشارة إلى قرار مجلس الأوقاف رقم 4/11 /2018، تاريخ 12/ 8/ 2018، والخاص بإعادة جزء من الحصص المسجلة من قطعة الأرض رقم (5) حوض رقم (3) البلد/ قرية الطنيب من أراضي جنوب عمان، والمسجلة باسم المتولي العام على الوقف وزارة الأوقاف والشؤون والمقدسات الإسلامية. راجياً سماحتكم الإيعاز لمن يلزم بعرض الأمر على مجلس الإفتاء لإبداء الرأي الشرعي، علماً بأنه تم تسجيل كامل القطعة مقبرة استناداً لقانون الأوقاف والشؤون والمقدسات الإسلامية رقم (32) لسنة 2001م. مرفقاً بطيه صورة عن القرار الموصوف أعلاه.

وبعد الدراسة ومداولة الرأي قرر المجلس ما يأتي:

قواعد الشريعة تقضي بأن تفرق وزارة الأوقاف والشؤون والمقدسات الإسلامية بين حالتين:

الأولى: إذا سجل الواقف أرضه وقفاً بحجة رسمية، ففي هذه الحالة تتولى الوزارة شأن الأرض المسجلة كاملة ملتزمة بشرط الواقف.

الثانية: إذا لم تسجل الأرض وقفاً، وإنما تم الدفن فيها عملياً دون حجة وقف، ففي هذه الحالة لا يجوز تسجيل الأرض كاملة باسم المتولي العام وزارة الأوقاف، وإنما غاية ما يمكن للوزارة تسجيله – بحسب قوانينها وأنظمتها – هو الجزء الذي تم الدفن فيه فعلياً مع حريم "ارتداد" يناسبه، دون باقي الأرض الفارغة. إذ الأصل بقاء ما كان على ما كان، والمساحة الفارغة من الدفن لم تتغير صفتها شرعاً، فليست من ولاية الأوقاف، بل تعاد لأصحابها. والله تعالى أعلم.

 

المفتي العام للمملكة / سماحة الدكتور محمد الخلايلة

الشيخ عبد الكريم الخصاونة / عضو       

الشيخ سعيد الحجاوي / عضو

     أ.د. عبد الله الفواز / عضو       

  د. محمد خير العيسى / عضو

      د. ماجد الدراوشة / عضو       

  أ.د. آدم نوح القضاة / عضو

          القاضي خالد وريكات / عضو     

 د. أحمد الحسنات / عضو

        د. رشاد الكيلاني / عضو       

         د. محمد يونس الزعبي / عضو

 

 

Decision Number [ Previous | Next ]


Summarized Fatawaa

What is the ruling on swearing an oath by the Prophet ﷺ, and does such an oath take effect according to Imām Aḥmad ibn Ḥanbal, requiring expiation upon its breach?

All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master the Messenger of Allah ﷺ.
Swearing an oath by a created being is disliked (makrūh) in our Shāfiʿī school. Shaykh al-Islām Imām al-Nawawī, may Allah have mercy upon him, states: "Swearing by a created being is disliked — such as swearing by the Prophet, the Kaʿbah, Jibrīl, the Companions, or the Prophet's family. Al-Shāfiʿī, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: 'I fear that swearing by other than Allah the Almighty may constitute an act of disobedience.' The scholars of the school explained this to mean: that is, something forbidden and sinful — indicating that he had some hesitation in the matter. Al-Imām stated: the established position of the school is that it is categorically not forbidden, but rather disliked. Furthermore, whoever swears by a created being, his oath does not take effect and no expiation (kaffārah) is required if he breaks it." [Rawḍat al-Ṭālibīn wa ʿUmdat al-Muftīn, Vol. 11/P.6]
According to the Ḥanbalī school, however, expiation becomes obligatory upon one who swears by our master the Prophet ﷺ and then breaks his oath. Imām al-Bahūtī al-Ḥanbalī, may Allah have mercy upon him, states: "No expiation is required for swearing by other than Allah the Almighty, even if the oath is broken — because expiation was made obligatory for swearing by Allah and His attributes, out of reverence for His names, and nothing else is equal to Him in this regard... except in the case of swearing by our Prophet Muḥammad ﷺ, for expiation becomes obligatory when one swears by him and then breaks the oath. This was explicitly stated in the narration of Abū Ṭālib, because he is one of the two conditions of the two testimonies of faith by which a disbeliever becomes a Muslim. Ibn ʿAqīl held the view that swearing by any of the other prophets, peace and blessings be upon them all, carries the same ruling." [Sharḥ Muntahā al-Irādāt, Vol. 3/P.441]. And Allah the Almighty knows best.

What is required of a traveler or a sick person if they broke their fast and then their excuse ceased?

If a traveler settles or a sick person recovers after having broken their fast, it is recommended for them to refrain from eating and drinking for the rest of the day, but it is not obligatory.

If someone regularly fasts the six days of Shawwal, are they obligated to fast them every year?

A person is not obligated to fast the six days of Shawwal every year, even if they have made it a habit. However, someone who regularly performs a good deed should not abandon it as long as they are able.

Is it permissible for one who sacrifices on behalf of another, with the latter's permission, to eat from the sacrifice?

It is permissible for someone who sacrificed on behalf of another with their permission to eat from it with their permission, and they stand in their place (act as their representative) in distributing it.
 
It is stated in Nihayat al-Muhtaj ila Sharh al-Minhaj (Vol.8/P.141): "And he—meaning the one sacrificing on his own behalf, provided he has not apostatized—has the right to eat from a voluntary sacrifice and his sacrificial gift; rather, it is recommended. As for an obligatory sacrifice, it is forbidden for him to eat from it, whether it was designated as such initially or as a liability in his dhimmah. And excluded by what has preceded is if he sacrifices on behalf of another, or if he apostatized, then it is not permissible for him to eat from it, just as it is absolutely impermissible to feed a disbeliever from it."(The text I found indicates the impermissibility of eating) ???
 
And it is stated in Hashiyat al-Jamal ‘ala Sharh al-Manhaj (Vol.5/P.262): "If a person offers a sacrifice on behalf of a living person with their permission, does he act as their representative in distributing it—on the grounds that permission to sacrifice is permission to distribute it—or does it depend on their explicit permission? This requires consideration, but the first view is not far-fetched." And Allah the Almighty knows best.