Resolutions of Iftaa' Board



Resolutions of Iftaa' Board

قرار رقم: (272) مقبرة قرية الطنيب

Date Added : 11-03-2019

قرار رقم: (272) (5 / 2019) مقبرة قرية الطنيب

بتاريخ (30/جمادى الآخرة/1440هـ) الموافق (7 / 3/ 2019م)

 

الحمد لله رب العالمين، والصلاة والسلام على سيدنا محمد، وعلى آله وصحبه أجمعين، وبعد

فإن مجلس الإفتاء والبحوث والدراسات الإسلامية في جلسته الثالثة المنعقدة يوم الخميس (30/جمادى الآخرة/1440هـ)، الموافق (7/3/ 2019م) قد نظر في الكتاب الوارد من معالي وزير الأوقاف والشؤون والمقدسات الإسلامية (رقم 4/6 /2 /14037، تاريخ 25/11/ 2018م) حيث جاء فيه: إشارة إلى قرار مجلس الأوقاف رقم 4/11 /2018، تاريخ 12/ 8/ 2018، والخاص بإعادة جزء من الحصص المسجلة من قطعة الأرض رقم (5) حوض رقم (3) البلد/ قرية الطنيب من أراضي جنوب عمان، والمسجلة باسم المتولي العام على الوقف وزارة الأوقاف والشؤون والمقدسات الإسلامية. راجياً سماحتكم الإيعاز لمن يلزم بعرض الأمر على مجلس الإفتاء لإبداء الرأي الشرعي، علماً بأنه تم تسجيل كامل القطعة مقبرة استناداً لقانون الأوقاف والشؤون والمقدسات الإسلامية رقم (32) لسنة 2001م. مرفقاً بطيه صورة عن القرار الموصوف أعلاه.

وبعد الدراسة ومداولة الرأي قرر المجلس ما يأتي:

قواعد الشريعة تقضي بأن تفرق وزارة الأوقاف والشؤون والمقدسات الإسلامية بين حالتين:

الأولى: إذا سجل الواقف أرضه وقفاً بحجة رسمية، ففي هذه الحالة تتولى الوزارة شأن الأرض المسجلة كاملة ملتزمة بشرط الواقف.

الثانية: إذا لم تسجل الأرض وقفاً، وإنما تم الدفن فيها عملياً دون حجة وقف، ففي هذه الحالة لا يجوز تسجيل الأرض كاملة باسم المتولي العام وزارة الأوقاف، وإنما غاية ما يمكن للوزارة تسجيله – بحسب قوانينها وأنظمتها – هو الجزء الذي تم الدفن فيه فعلياً مع حريم "ارتداد" يناسبه، دون باقي الأرض الفارغة. إذ الأصل بقاء ما كان على ما كان، والمساحة الفارغة من الدفن لم تتغير صفتها شرعاً، فليست من ولاية الأوقاف، بل تعاد لأصحابها. والله تعالى أعلم.

 

المفتي العام للمملكة / سماحة الدكتور محمد الخلايلة

الشيخ عبد الكريم الخصاونة / عضو       

الشيخ سعيد الحجاوي / عضو

     أ.د. عبد الله الفواز / عضو       

  د. محمد خير العيسى / عضو

      د. ماجد الدراوشة / عضو       

  أ.د. آدم نوح القضاة / عضو

          القاضي خالد وريكات / عضو     

 د. أحمد الحسنات / عضو

        د. رشاد الكيلاني / عضو       

         د. محمد يونس الزعبي / عضو

 

 

Decision Number [ Previous | Next ]


Summarized Fatawaa

What is the ruling on shaving the head of the newborn?

It is desirable to shave the head of the newborn on the seventh day from delivery, and the weight of his/her hair is given in gold , or silver as charity.

What is the ruling of Islamic Law on performing ṭawāf on the upper floors of al-Masjid al-Ḥarām, given that these floors are situated above the level of the Ka‘bah, and that the one performing ṭawāf passes by certain barriers, such as pillars and walls, during the ṭawāf?

All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master, the Messenger of Allah ﷺ.
There are numerous conditions for the validity of ṭawāf (circumambulation around the Ka‘bah), among them: that the one performing ṭawāf be inside the Masjid (al-Masjid al-Ḥarām) — even if the Masjid has been expanded, so long as the expansion does not extend out into al-ḥill (land outside the sanctuary boundaries). It suffices for the ṭawāf to be performed in the airspace of the Masjid or upon its roof, even if that roof is higher than the Ka‘bah (the House) itself.
Al-Khaṭīb ash-Shirbīnī (raḥimahullāh) said: "It [ṭawāf] is valid upon the roof of the Masjid, even if the roof of the Masjid is higher than the House — just as prayer [is valid] upon Mount Abū Qubays despite its elevation above the House. This is the relied-upon (mu‘tamad) position." [Mughnī al-Muḥtāj, Vol.2/P.246]
The validity of the tawaf isn`t affected by the pillars and walls standing between the one performing ṭawāf and the House, since the condition is only that the person performing ṭawāf be within the boundaries of the Masjid and outside the boundaries of the Ka‘bah itself.
Ash-Shirbīnī said: "It [ṭawāf] is valid inside the Masjid, even if it is expanded, and even if a barrier stands between the one circumambulating and the House — such as a water-supply structure (saqāyah) or pillars (sawārī)." [Mughnī al-Muḥtāj, Vol. 2/P.246]
Accordingly, ṭawāf performed on the upper floors is valid, and the presence of barriers such as pillars and walls during the ṭawāf does not affect its validity. And Allah, the Exalted, knows best.

What is the ruling of Islamic Law regarding one who slaughters a ewe and it turns out to have been pregnant, and is it permissible to slaughter the ewe if one knows it is pregnant?

Praise be to Allah, and peace and blessings upon our master, the Messenger of Allah.
If a person slaughters a ewe and it turns out to have been pregnant, the fetus becomes lawful (ḥalāl) by virtue of its mother's slaughter (tabaʿan li-ummihā).
It is stated in Mughnī al-Muḥtāj (Vol.6/P.158): "A fetus found dead [after the mother's slaughter], or found alive but in a state resembling that of a slaughtered animal [i.e., dying shortly after], becomes lawful — whether or not it had grown fur — provided it is found in the womb of a mother that was lawfully slaughtered, whether her slaughter was by cutting the throat, or by an arrow or hunting dog sent after her. This is based on the ḥadīth: 'The slaughtering of the fetus is [effected by] the slaughtering of its mother' [narrated by al-Tirmidhī, who graded it ḥasan, and by Ibn Ḥibbān, who graded it ṣaḥīḥ] — meaning that the slaughter which rendered the mother lawful renders the fetus lawful as well, by virtue of following her; and because the fetus is one of her constituent parts, and her slaughter renders lawful all of her parts."
This ruling differs, however, from the case of one who knows from the outset that the ewe is pregnant [and intends to sacrifice her specifically as the udḥiyah while pregnant] — in which case, according to the Shāfi'ī school, she does not fulfill the requirement of a valid sacrifice.
It is stated in Ḥāshiyat al-Bujayrimī 'alā al-Khaṭīb (Vol.4/P.335): "A pregnant animal does not fulfill the requirement [of a valid sacrifice], and this is the authoritative position (al-mu'tamad), because pregnancy diminishes the quality of the meat. As for why such an animal is nevertheless counted as complete [i.e., fully valid] in matters of zakāh, that is because the intent there is reproduction (nasl), not the quality of the meat.". And Allah, the Most High, knows best.

What is the ruling on istinja' after urination, and is it done with water and soap or with water only?

Istinja' from urine and stool is obligatory. It is permissible to perform istinja' with water alone, or with toilet paper alone. The best way is with toilet paper then water. If one wishes to suffice with one of them, then water is better. And Allah the Almighty knows best.