عربي
Home


The Fatwa Approach Adopted at the General Ifta' De



Iftaa' Department


The Fatwa Approach Adopted at the General Iftaa' Department

The questions of Islamic jurisprudence are many and varied, and they touch every sphere of life and every human practice. The scholars of Islam have left us a vast legacy of rulings and legislation that illuminates people’s lives with the light of divine wisdom. Their juristic and legislative choices rest on a firm foundation of recognized sources of law: the Qur’an, the Sunnah, consensus, analogy, and considerations of public interest.

This juristic heritage has settled into four recognized schools of Islamic thought: the Ḥanafī, the Mālikī, the Shāfiʿī, and the Ḥanbalī. There is consensus that they are to be adopted and regarded as valid paths to attaining the pleasure of Allah the Mighty and Majestic and to safeguarding the interests of the land and its people.

Since the General Iftaa`Department is one link in the scholarly chain of the broader juristic movement, it chose to adopt one of the four schools as the point of departure and foundation for the juristic positions on which it issues fatwas. Through this adoption, it seeks to secure the great benefits and interests that the juristic movement has realized throughout Islamic history, foremost among them:

1. Safety before Allah the Mighty and Majestic on the Day of the Great Reckoning, so that we do not alter or change anything in Allah’s religion without His leave.

2. Realizing moderation, which is among the foundations of the Islamic Sharīʿah and one of the distinguishing features of this vast juristic legacy.

3. Safety from inconsistent opinions and anomalous views that cause disorder in intellectual and practical life.

4. Ensuring discipline in the issuance of fatwas and reducing unproductive disagreement as far as possible.

5. Helping muftis arrive at the Sharīʿah rulings by the easiest route. A lifetime would not suffice for a mufti who sought to exercise full ijtihād on every question put before him, so drawing upon earlier jurists is the indispensable solution.

The General Iftaa` Department chose the school of Imam al-Shāfiʿī as the foundation and point of departure for fatwas in our blessed land, for two reasons:

First: it is the most widespread school in our country throughout history, and taking account of the majority is an objective of the Sharīʿah.

Second: it is a moderate school that combined the principles of the school of ḥadīth and that of considered opinion. It produced juristic conclusions that have been, and remain, a means of serving the interests of the Ummah and uniting its word. Although this quality is found in the other schools as well, the school of Imam al-Shāfiʿī took the lead in it.

The Department’s commitment to issuing fatwas according to the Shāfiʿī school does not mean complete taqlīd (to follow the opinion of a scholar without knowing the evidence on which it is based) to the conclusions of the school’s jurists. Rather, the Department has an advanced approach to benefiting from the full range of positions of all the schools, within the following parameters:

1. New contemporary issues (nawāzil). If a matter concerns a new development of the age not addressed in the jurists’ rulings, or is a general matter affecting society or the entire Ummah, whether in financial transactions, medical issues, or other areas, the Department must prepare dedicated studies examining it in light of the Sharīʿah evidence and legal maxims, and weighing benefits against harms. It arrives at a Sharīʿah ruling that is presented to the Iftaāʾ Board for deliberation, leading to a formal decision on the matter.

2. Where the Shāfiʿī position no longer suits changed circumstances. If the Shāfiʿī position on a particular question does not suit changes of time, place, and the circumstances surrounding the questioner, for example where it would cause severe hardship or extreme difficulty, or where the underlying reason for which the Shāfiʿī jurists stipulated the position has changed, or where new scientific information or facts call for revisiting the juristic choice, in all these cases the Department re-examines the question in light of the legal maxims and the objectives of the Sharīʿah. It draws on the conclusions of all the Islamic schools to reach the ruling closest to the Sharīʿah’s objectives.

3. Personal status matters. In matters such as marriage, divorce, child custody, and inheritance, the Department relies on the Jordanian Personal Status Law and does not depart from it, so as to avoid any conflict between the Iftaāʾ institution and the Sharīʿah judiciary in the Kingdom. The law draws on the conclusions and opinions of Muslim jurists, selected on sound Sharīʿah principles and criteria by specialized committees.

Thus, the esteemed muftis handle the questions that reach them from the public through various channels, within a graduated sequence and a precise mechanism. It begins by determining which of the above categories the question falls under, and ends with the answer reaching the questioner as quickly as possible. Where delay occurs, it is only because of the detailed study the Department undertakes for dozens of questions each day. A mufti who knows that he is answerable before Allah the Mighty and Majestic for every word he writes will undoubtedly prefer deliberation and care over haste and hurried judgment.

And Allah is the Granter of success.

  

Summarized Fatawaa

What is the ruling on praying seated due to severe obesity, given that I experience hardship in performing the prayer — especially when rising from the ground after sujūd to perform the next rak‘ah?

All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master, the Messenger of Allah ﷺ.
Standing, when one is able to do so, is a pillar of the prayer. However, whoever would experience severe, intolerable hardship, or fears harm to himself or to a limb due to obesity, or finds that standing causes him to lose his khushū‘ (humble focus and concentration) in prayer, then there is no objection to his praying seated on a chair or on the ground, performing rukū‘ (bowing) and sujūd (prostration) through gesture — provided that the gesture for sujūd is made lower than that for rukū‘. Whoever is able, at any point, to properly perform any one of these pillars, is obligated to perform it in full; for omitting it is a concession that applies only in cases of genuine inability. The Prophet ﷺ said: "When I command you to do something, do of it whatever you are able." (Related by al-Bukhārī). As the scholars of fiqh have established: what remains possible is not waived on account of what is difficult.
The criterion for determining genuine inability, as chosen by Imam al-Ḥaramayn al-Juwaynī (raḥimahullāh), is that the worshipper experiences hardship that causes him to lose his khushū‘.
As for voluntary (nafl) prayer, there is no objection to performing it while seated, even if one is able to stand. However, rukū‘ and sujūd must still be performed [in their proper physical form] by anyone who is able to do so. And Allah, the Exalted, knows best.

Is it permissible for a husband to sell his wife`s jewelry if he was in a hard up?

A woman`s jewelry and dowry are her own property, and it is forbidden for the husband to take either without obtaining her approval. However, it is desirable for the wife to support her husband through considering her jewelry a sort of documented debt on him.

Is it acceptable to perform the Aqiqah for a male child by slaughtering and distributing the first sheep, and bringing the second one cooked from the restaurant?

 

Praise be to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master, the Messenger of Allah.

It is permissible to slaughter the first sheep with the intention of Aqiqah (the newborn's sacrificial offering) and distribute it entirely [uncooked], and to slaughter the second sheep and have it cooked at a restaurant to bring home for the household. However, it must be noted that it is obligatory to give some portion of the Aqiqah in charity to the poor, even if it is a small amount, though it is preferable to send the food cooked to them.

Buying a pre-cooked, ready-made sheep from a restaurant does not suffice as an Aqiqah. However, if an agreement is made with the restaurant to explicitly slaughter a sheep with the intention of Aqiqah for the newborn, and then cook it afterward, this is permissible.

In conclusion, slaughtering the sheep and distributing it with the intention of Aqiqah is permissible, and through it, the foundational prophetic tradition (Sunnah) is fulfilled. As for simply buying a cooked sheep from a restaurant that was not specifically slaughtered with the intention of Aqiqah, it will not count as such. Conversely, if the restaurant owner is commissioned (Wakala) to handle both the slaughtering and the cooking as an Aqiqah, it is valid. And Allah the Almighty knows best.

What is the ruling on performing voluntary (nafl) prayer during the time of istiwā' (the sun's zenith) on the day of Jumu‘ah (Friday), and is this ruling specific to someone who has come to the mosque to perform the Jumu‘ah prayer?

All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master, the Messenger of Allah ﷺ.
It is permissible to perform voluntary (nafl) prayer during the time of istiwā' (the sun's zenith, i.e., its highest point before noon) on the day of Jumu‘ah (Friday) — whether for someone who is attending the Friday prayer or someone who is not, and whether they are among the people obligated to attend it or not.
It is stated in Mughnī al-Muḥtāj (Vol.1/P.310): "The more correct position (al-aṣaḥḥ) is that prayer is permissible during this time without restriction — regardless of whether the person will be attending the Jumu‘ah prayer or not." And Allah, the Exalted, knows best.

See More