Resolutions of Iftaa' Board



Resolutions of Iftaa' Board

قرار رقم: (34) حكم استثمارات صندوق الضمان الاجتماعي للتربية والتعليم من خلال إيداع الأموال في بنوك ربوية أو شراء الأسهم

Date Added : 28-10-2015

 

قرار رقم: (34) حكم استثمارات صندوق الضمان الاجتماعي للتربية والتعليم من خلال إيداع الأموال في بنوك ربوية

أو شراء الأسهم

بتاريخ: 28/ 11/ 1413هـ، الموافق: 20/ 5/ 1993م

 ورد إلينا سؤال يقول فيه صاحبه:

ما الحكم الشرعي في استثمارات صندوق الضمان الاجتماعي للتربية والتعليم في إيداع الأموال في بنك الإسكان بفائدة، وشراء أسهم في بنك الأردن والخليج، وشراء أسهم في شركة التأمين العامة العربية، وشراء سندات تنمية من البنك المركزي، وشراء سندات قرض سلطة المياه من البنك المركزي الأردني، وشراء أسهم في الشركة العربية الدولية للفنادق؟

 الجواب وبالله التوفيق:

رأى المجلس  أن شراء الأسهم في مؤسسة ربوية حرام شرعًا؛ لأنه يعني تشغيل المال المستثمر بالحرام، وهذا ينطبق على شراء الأسهم في بنك الأردن، والخليج، وسندات التنمية الصادرة عن البنك المركزي، ومستندات قرض سلطة المياه من البنك المركزي.

أما إيداع الأموال في البنك الربوي بفائدة فهو حرام شرعًا أيضا، وهذا ينطبق على إيداع الأموال في بنك الإسكان بفائدة.

أما فيما يتعلق بشراء أسهم في الشركات بصفة عامة: فإن جواز شراء أسهمها متوقف على طبيعة عملها: فإن كان مشروعًا حلالاً فهو حلال، وإلا فهو حرام. والله تعالى أعلم.

رئيس مجلس الإفتاء

قاضي القضاة / د. نوح علي سلمان القضاة

المفتـي العام بالوكالـة/ الشيخ سعيد حجاوي

مفتي القوات المسلحة الأردنية/ الشيخ محمود الشويات

د. عبدالسلام العبادي

د. يوسف علي غيظان

د. أحمد هليــل

د. عبدالعزيز الخياط

د. محمود السرطاوي

إبراهيم خشـــــان

الشيخ راتب الظاهر

 

 

 

Decision Number [ Next ]


Summarized Fatawaa

Does Laylat al-Qadr move between the nights of Ramadan?

Laylat al-Qadr is definitely in Ramadan, and it is most likely in the last ten nights, especially on the odd-numbered nights.
For this reason, the Prophet ﷺ commanded observing worship in the last ten nights, and he himself used to dedicate those nights to worship. Many people put special effort into the 27th night of Ramadan, and they are rewarded in any case, whether they actually coincide with Laylat al-Qadr or not, because worshiping on any night of Ramadan carries great rewards.

Is the son of the sister by breastfeeding considered a mahram in Islam, and is it permissible for a woman to go for Hajj with him?

Everything that is prohibited by lineage is also prohibited by breastfeeding. The son of the sister by breastfeeding is considered a mahram, just like the son of the sister by blood, and it is permissible for him to be her mahram for Hajj and Umrah. And Allah Knows Best.

What is the ruling on wiping over socks?

It is not permissible to wipe over most common socks today because the conditions for wiping are not met. The concession was reported for wiping over leather socks (khuff) and socks (jowrab) with conditions: They must be thick, not allowing poured water to penetrate, enable one to walk in them, be worn while in a state of purity (from ablution), cover the entire foot up to the ankles (meaning covering the protruding ankle bones), and not be torn. And Allah the Almighty knows best.

What is the ruling of Islamic Law regarding one who slaughters a ewe and it turns out to have been pregnant, and is it permissible to slaughter the ewe if one knows it is pregnant?

Praise be to Allah, and peace and blessings upon our master, the Messenger of Allah.
If a person slaughters a ewe and it turns out to have been pregnant, the fetus becomes lawful (ḥalāl) by virtue of its mother's slaughter (tabaʿan li-ummihā).
It is stated in Mughnī al-Muḥtāj (Vol.6/P.158): "A fetus found dead [after the mother's slaughter], or found alive but in a state resembling that of a slaughtered animal [i.e., dying shortly after], becomes lawful — whether or not it had grown fur — provided it is found in the womb of a mother that was lawfully slaughtered, whether her slaughter was by cutting the throat, or by an arrow or hunting dog sent after her. This is based on the ḥadīth: 'The slaughtering of the fetus is [effected by] the slaughtering of its mother' [narrated by al-Tirmidhī, who graded it ḥasan, and by Ibn Ḥibbān, who graded it ṣaḥīḥ] — meaning that the slaughter which rendered the mother lawful renders the fetus lawful as well, by virtue of following her; and because the fetus is one of her constituent parts, and her slaughter renders lawful all of her parts."
This ruling differs, however, from the case of one who knows from the outset that the ewe is pregnant [and intends to sacrifice her specifically as the udḥiyah while pregnant] — in which case, according to the Shāfi'ī school, she does not fulfill the requirement of a valid sacrifice.
It is stated in Ḥāshiyat al-Bujayrimī 'alā al-Khaṭīb (Vol.4/P.335): "A pregnant animal does not fulfill the requirement [of a valid sacrifice], and this is the authoritative position (al-mu'tamad), because pregnancy diminishes the quality of the meat. As for why such an animal is nevertheless counted as complete [i.e., fully valid] in matters of zakāh, that is because the intent there is reproduction (nasl), not the quality of the meat.". And Allah, the Most High, knows best.