عربي
Home


Resolutions of Iftaa' Board


Resolutions of Iftaa' Board

Resolution No.(333):"Ruling on Considering Agricultural Projects for the Poor as Ongoing Charity (Sadaqah Jariyah)"

Date Added : 26-03-2026

Resolution No.(333): "Ruling on Considering Agricultural Projects for the Poor as Ongoing Charity (Sadaqah Jariyah)"

 

 Date: (19/ Ramadan/ 1447 AH), corresponding to (March 9, 2026 AD)

Praise be to Allah, Lord of the Worlds, and peace and blessings be upon our Master Muhammad, and upon all his family and companions. 

The Board of Iftaa’, Research, and Islamic Studies, in its third session held on the above, reviewed the inquiry submitted by the "Tkiyet Um Ali" Foundation, which states:

We, Tkiyet Um Ali—in partnership with the Dar Abu Abdullah Association—are launching an economic project to serve the poor beneficiaries of the Tkiyet through agricultural projects, where the financial returns go to the benefit of the poor laborers working in these projects. A donor may contribute one or more shares at a value of fifty dinars per share. These include sustainable hydroponic projects, such as greenhouses, climate-smart systems, and smart irrigation. Other projects include tailoring and home production using modern equipment and sustainable supplies to link high-quality products to the market. The Question that arises here is : Are these donations considered 'Ongoing Charity' (Sadaqah Jariyah)? Which of the mentioned projects qualify as such? And can spending and donating to these projects be considered among the valid channels of Zakat?

After research, study, and deliberation, the Board decided the following:

First: It is obligatory to distribute Zakat to its eligible recipients among the categories mentioned in the words of Allah the Almighty: "Zakat expenditures are only for the poor and for the needy and for those employed to collect [zakat] and for bringing hearts together [for Islam] and for freeing captives and for those in debt and for the cause of Allah and for the [stranded] traveler - an obligation [imposed] by Allah. And Allah is Knowing and Wise." [At-Tawbah/60].

The jurists, deriving from this noble verse, stated that Zakat must result in transfer of ownership (Tamleek) to the poor person. It is not sufficient for the poor person to merely be a laborer in a project, nor is it permissible to establish investment projects with Zakat funds. The jurists made no exception except for the Sovereign (Wali al-Amr) or his representative, allowing them to grant the poor person ownership of Zakat in the form of a project from which they can earn a living. As for private entities, they are not permitted to do so based on the "Lām of Ownership" (Lām al-Tamleek) in the verse.

Second: Regarding Voluntary Charity (Sadaqah al-Tatawwu’), Ongoing Charity (Sadaqah Jariyah), and Endowments (Waqf); it is permissible to receive and spend them for the purposes for which they were collected, provided that the donors are aware of the intent of their donations. This is because voluntary charities and donations are managed according to the conditions set by the donor.

Third: Regarding whether the mentioned projects are considered Ongoing Charity: Scholars have interpreted "Ongoing Charity" as being an Endowment (Waqf) and anything that provides continuous benefit. As Imam al-Shirbini (may Allah have mercy on him) said:

"In terms of Sharia, Waqf is the retention of a property from which benefit can be derived while the asset itself remains intact, by terminating any right of disposal over its core ownership, for a permissible and existing recipient. Ongoing Charity is understood by scholars to mean Waqf, as stated by al-Rafi’i, for other types of charity are not 'ongoing'; rather, the recipient immediately owns both the asset and its benefits." (Mughni al-Muhtaj,Vol. 3/P.523).

We hope in Allah that these projects, which provide lasting benefit, will carry the reward of Ongoing Charity. And Allah the Exalted knows best.

Chairperson of Iftaa` Board,

Grand Mufti of Jordan,

Dr. Ahmad Al-Hasanat

Dr. Mohammad Al-Khalayleh/ Member

Prof. Mahmood Al-Sartawi/ Member

Dr. Zaid Al-Kilani/ Member

Sheikh Sa`eid Al-Hijjawi/ Member

Dr. Atif Al-Qhodah/ Member

Judge Fares Foraihat/ Member

Prof. Adam Nooh Al-Qhodat/ Member

Dr. Amjad Rasheed/ Member

Prof. Waleed Al-Shaweesh/ Member

Dr. Mohammad Younis Al-Zou`bi/ Member

Decision Number [ Previous ]


Summarized Fatawaa

What are the legal and religious consequences for a charitable organization in the event that a sacrificial animal is damaged or spoiled after slaughter?

All praise is due to Allah, and may peace and blessings be upon our Master, the Messenger of Allah.
Charitable organizations entrusted with slaughtering sacrificial animals (uḍḥiyyah) and distributing their meat on behalf of their owners are obligated to safeguard the meat from spoilage, damage, theft, and any other harm. This is because such organizations act as agents (wukalā') on behalf of those offering the sacrifice, and an agent holds what is entrusted to them in trust (amānah) — whether they receive a wage for their work or act on a voluntary basis.
If the sacrificial animal is damaged after slaughter during the processes of packaging, transportation, or storage due to negligence or oversight — whether on the part of the organization's own staff overseeing the operation, or on the part of third parties contracted by the organization such as transport or shipping companies — then liability falls upon the negligent party, who is required to compensate for the value of the sacrifice. It is not permissible to cover such compensation from the organization's other donor funds.
However, if the damage to the sacrificial animal occurs without any negligence in its preservation and storage on the part of any party involved in the transportation, shipping, or storage process, and is instead attributable to force majeure circumstances beyond their control, then no financial liability is borne by any party in such a case. And Allah Almighty knows best.

A woman made a wig for herself from her own [previously shed] hair, which she wears on her head after having lost her hair [due to hair loss]. Is this permissible?

All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master, the Messenger of Allah ﷺ.
Since the hair belongs to the woman herself, the wig can be removed during the obligatory ghusl (ritual bathing), and part of the head can still be wiped during wuḍū' (ablution), there is no sharī‘ah objection to making this wig — provided she does not appear wearing it in front of non-maḥram men (Any males outside a woman's immediate family whom she is permitted to marry under Islamic law), since it is not permissible for them to look at a woman's detached hair.
It is stated in Rawḍat aṭ-Ṭālibīn wa ‘Umdat al-Muftīn: "Whatever it is not permissible to look at while still attached [to the body] — such as the male genitalia, a free woman's forearm, the hair of her head, and a man's pubic hair, and similar matters — it remains unlawful to look at even after it has been detached [from the body], according to the more correct position (al-aṣaḥḥ)." And Allah, the Exalted, knows best.

What is the Islamic ruling on breaking the bones of the 'aqīqah?

All praise is due to Allah, and may peace and blessings be upon our Master, the Messenger of Allah.
It is Sunnah not to break the bones of the 'aqīqah. Rather, each bone should be separated at its joint — as a good omen and expression of hope for the soundness and wholeness of the newborn's limbs. However, if one does break the bones, it is not considered disliked (makrūh) — it is simply regarded as contrary to what is preferable (khilāf al-awlā). And Allah Almighty knows best.

What is the ruling on a second congregation [being formed] in the mosque?

All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master, the Messenger of Allah ﷺ.
It is disliked to deliberately seek to establish a second congregation in a mosque that is not one frequented by transient passersby — such as a neighborhood mosque with a regular, appointed imam — unless permission is granted by that imam, since doing so implies criticism and an affront to him. However, if the mosque is one frequented by transient passersby — such as mosques located in marketplaces — then a second or even third congregation is permissible there, whether or not it has a regular, appointed imam, and whether or not that imam gives his permission. This is because such mosques experience a continuous flow of people coming and going, so no implication of criticism toward the imam is perceived in the formation of multiple congregations in that setting. And Allah, the Exalted, knows best.

See More