Articles

Hujjat al-Islam al-Ghazali: Spiritual Refinement through Examples from the Jurisprudence of Financial Dealings
Author : Dr. Safwan Odaybat
Date Added : 29-03-2026

Hujjat al-Islam al-Ghazali:

Spiritual Refinement through Examples from the Jurisprudence of Financial Dealings

 

Praise be to Allah the Lord of the Worlds. May His peace and blessings be upon our Prophet Mohammad and upon all his family and companions.

When Imam Taj al-Din ‘Abd al-Wahhab al-Subki (d. 771 AH), may Allah have mercy on him, wrote the biography of Imam al-Ghazali (d. 505 AH), he said: “Hujjat al-Islam, the clear path of the religion through which one reaches the Abode of Peace, the gatherer of the scattered branches of knowledge, excelling in both transmitted and understood sciences. He was the most knowledgeable among his peers, the imam of the people of his time, and the foremost in his field. His stature was testified to by both those who agreed with him and those who opposed him, and even his adversaries acknowledged his rank.”

[See: al-Subki, Taj al-Din ‘Abd al-Wahhab, Tabaqat al-Shafi‘iyyah al-Kubra, ed. Dr. Muhammad al-Tanahi and Dr. ‘Abd al-Fattah al-Hilu, Dar al-Hijrah for Printing, Publishing and Distribution, 2nd ed., 1413 AH, 6/191–194.]

When Imam al-Dhahabi wrote about al-Ghazali, may Allah have mercy on them both, he said: “The great shaykh, the imam, the ocean of knowledge, Hujjat al-Islam, the wonder of his time, (author of many works) and of extraordinary intelligence.”

[See: al-Dhahabi, Shams al-Din Abu ‘Abd Allah Muhammad ibn Ahmad (d. 748 AH), Siyar A‘lam al-Nubala’, Dar al-Hadith, Cairo, 1427 AH, 14/267.]

Imam al-Ghazali attained this lofty status in knowledge, jurisprudence, spiritual purification, and piety. Thus, it is no surprise that in his book Ihya’ ‘Ulum al-Din—a work on spiritual refinement and Sufism—you find insights into financial dealings, and a remarkable connection between purification of the soul and the foundations of monetary theory and wealth, which is a branch of economics. He moves from speaking about the love of Allah to discussing the prohibition of hoarding, from reflecting on gratitude to explaining the cause of riba.

Hujjat al-Islam, may Allah have mercy on him, speaks about the meaning of gratitude in the Book of Patience and Gratitude from the section on the means of salvation in Ihya’ ‘Ulum al-Din. He defines gratitude as:

“Using the blessings of Allah in what He loves; and ingratitude is its opposite—either by abandoning their use or by using them in what He dislikes.”

[See: al-Ghazali, Muhammad ibn Muhammad ibn Muhammad (d. 505 AH), Ihya’ ‘Ulum al-Din, Dar al-Ma‘rifah, Beirut, 4/90.]

He then explains that attaining gratitude requires knowing what Allah loves and what He dislikes. This knowledge is based on understanding all the rulings of the noble Shariah concerning human actions, as well as perceiving the wisdom behind everything that exists. For Allah did not create anything without wisdom, and beneath that wisdom lies a purpose—and that purpose is what is beloved. These wisdoms are of two types: apparent and hidden.

Reaching Allah—who is the ultimate purpose of creation—can only be achieved through loving Him. Love for Him is established through constant remembrance and reflection, which in turn requires the preservation of the body. The body cannot survive except through nourishment, and nourishment depends on earth, water, and air. The body is thus the mount of the soul, which Allah created for the purpose of knowing Him.

After this journey through the secrets of knowing Allah and the paths leading to Him, Imam al-Ghazali transitions to an example of hidden wisdom that leads to true gratitude and avoidance of ingratitude. He says: “Among the blessings of Allah is the creation of dinars and dirhams. Through them the world is maintained. They are merely stones with no inherent benefit, yet people are compelled to use them because each person needs various goods—food, clothing, and other necessities… These diverse and scattered goods require a mediator to judge between them with fairness, so that each item’s rank and value may be known. Thus, Allah created dinars and dirhams as judges and intermediaries between all forms of wealth, by which wealth is measured.”

[Ihya’ ‘Ulum al-Din, 4/91.]

Through this, Imam al-Ghazali clarifies the importance of gold and silver (dinars and dirhams) and their purpose. They serve as the standard and intermediary between wealth, through which values are determined. They are not intended as commodities in themselves. Whoever uses them contrary to their intended purpose commits injustice and ingratitude, failing to realize true gratitude. Accordingly, the Shariah detailed rulings regarding them:

First: It prohibited riba (usury) in both excess and deferment. Exchanging gold for gold or silver for silver is only permissible hand to hand and equal for equal. Any increase turns money into an object of hoarding, which is injustice. Deferred exchange is also prohibited because it removes the element of goodwill found in lending and turns it into a transaction devoid of reward. As for exchanging gold for silver, it is permitted due to the difference in their functions.

[See: Ihya’ ‘Ulum al-Din, 4/91–92.]

Second: The Shariah prohibited hoarding gold and silver, because doing so removes them from their intended function. Wealth was not created for specific individuals, but to circulate among people as a fair standard. Allah says {what means}: “And those who hoard gold and silver and do not spend it in the way of Allah—give them tidings of a painful punishment.” (al-Tawbah/34)

Third: The Shariah prohibited using gold and silver as utensils, because this also removes them from their true function and turns them into tradable luxury goods.

Fourth: The Shariah prohibited hoarding food, because it is essential for life. Its purpose is nourishment and healing, and hoarding it restricts its availability and delays its intended use.

At the end of this discussion, Hujjat al-Islam briefly addresses the legal reasoning behind the prohibition of riba in food items. He says:

“Through this, the strength of al-Shafi‘i’s view becomes clear in restricting it to food items rather than all measurable goods…”

[Ihya’ ‘Ulum al-Din, 4/93.]

He also summarized the wisdom behind the prohibition of riba with the concise statement: “The Shariah has removed the pursuit of indulgence in what is essential for sustenance; this is the wisdom behind the prohibition of riba.”

[Ihya’ ‘Ulum al-Din, 4/93.]

That which sustains life (qiwam) includes gold and silver due to their monetary function, and also includes food, as indicated in the hadith, based on the characteristic of edibility according to the Shafi‘i school.

[See: al-Nawawi, al-Majmu‘ Sharh al-Muhadhdhab, 9/146.]

And Allah the Most High knows best.

The published article reflects the opinion of its author

Article Number [ Previous | Next ]

Read for Author




Comments


Captcha


Warning: this window is not dedicated to receive religious questions, but to comment on topics published for the benefit of the site administrators—and not for publication. We are pleased to receive religious questions in the section "Send Your Question". So we apologize to readers for not answering any questions through this window of "Comments" for the sake of work organization. Thank you.




Summarized Fatawaa

Is it permissible to offer an Udhiyah on behalf of the deceased?

In the Name of Allah, and may peace and blessings be upon our Master, the Messenger of Allah.
 
Offering an Udhiyah (sacrificial animal) on behalf of a deceased person is permissible. This is the official position of the Hanbali school (as stated in Kashshaf al-Qina’ by al-Bahuti,Vol.6/P.428) and was also upheld by the prominent Shafi'i scholar Al-’Abbadi (mentioned in Bidayat al-Muhtaj by Ibn Qadi Shuhbah,Vol. 4/P.358). It has likewise been narrated as a valid view among some Maliki and Hanafi scholars.
 
In fact, Imam Abu Dawud dedicated an entire chapter in his Sunan collection entitled, "Chapter on Sacrificing on Behalf of the Deceased." In it, he recorded a narration from Hanash, who said: "I saw 'Ali sacrificing two rams, so I asked him, 'What is this?' He replied, 'The Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) commanded me to offer a sacrifice on his behalf, so I am sacrificing on his behalf.'"
 
Imam Abu Dawud also narrated from Jabir (may Allah be pleased with him) that the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) said: "O Allah, this is from You, for You, and on behalf of Muhammad and his Ummah (community). In the Name of Allah, and Allah is the Greatest," and he then slaughtered the animal.
 
The textual evidence here lies in the fact that our Master, the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him), offered a sacrifice on behalf of his entire community—and it is well-established that his community includes those who have already passed away.
 
Furthermore, there is an abundance of sacred texts demonstrating that the rewards of righteous deeds reach the deceased. For instance, it is permissible to fast on behalf of a deceased person who passed away with missed obligatory fasts, and it is equally permissible to perform Hajj on their behalf, both of which are firmly established in authentic Hadiths. Therefore, if the reward of fasting (which is a purely physical act of worship) and Hajj (which is a joint physical and financial act of worship) can reach the deceased, then the reward of an Udhiyah reaches them with greater reason (by way of A Fortiori argument). This is because it is a purely financial act of worship, falling under the general category of charity (Sadaqah).
 
Additionally, scholars have reached a consensus (Ijma') that the rewards of charity reach the deceased, and since the Udhiyah is inherently an act of charity, it falls under the same ruling. Consequently, based on all the aforementioned evidence, we hold the view that offering a sacrifice on behalf of the deceased is entirely permissible. And Allah the Almighty Knows Best.

What is the ruling on offering a sheep as a sacrifice (Udhiyah) if its fat-tail is sound, except that when it was young, the tip of its fat-tail was cut so that it would grow larger? And what is the ruling in case of doubt regarding the amount that was cut?

 
In the Name of Allah, and may peace and blessings be upon our Master, the Messenger of Allah.
 
Cutting a minor, insignificant portion from the tip of an animal's fat-tail (al-alyah) to encourage it to grow larger is not considered a defect, and it does not prevent the animal from being valid for sacrifice (Udhiyah).
 
It is stated in Tuhfat al-Muhtaj (Vol.9/P.352): "There is some scholarly deliberation regarding the common practice of cutting the tip of the fat-tail so that it grows larger. It could potentially be likened to a partial cut of the ear—supported by the jurists' general rule: 'even if it is a small amount.' On the other hand, if it is an exceptionally minor cut, it might have no effect on validity. This is explicitly clarified by the juristic exception to the general rule, which states that cutting a tiny piece from a large limb causes no harm. This latter view is more well-founded.
 
Furthermore, I found that some scholars investigated this matter and concluded: 'It should not affect validity if a custom-sanctioned portion of its fat-tail is removed during its youth to make it grow larger and look better, just as castrating a male animal causes no harm.' However, applying this unconditionally contradicts the established texts of the jurists, as understood from what I have laid out; thus, the restriction I specified is what must be relied upon."
 
Similarly, it is mentioned in Nihayat al-Muhtaj (8/135): "If a small piece is cut from the fat-tail to help it grow larger, the most well-founded view is that the sacrifice remains valid, as was given in a formal legal verdict (Fatwa) by my father [Shihab al-Din al-Ramli], may Allah be pleased with him. This is proven by the jurists' maxim: 'The loss of a tiny piece from a large limb causes no harm.'"
 
In cases where there is doubt as to whether the portion cut was large or small, the animal is still deemed valid for sacrifice. It is noted in Hashiyat al-Shubramallisi ‘ala Nihayat al-Muhtaj (Vol.8/P.135):
 
"This matter requires careful consideration, but the closer and more correct view is that it is valid. This is because soundness is the default state for the animal from which the piece was cut, and it aligns with what usually occurs—namely, that the part removed to help the fat-tail grow larger is naturally very small." And Allah the Almighty Knows Best.

What is the ruling on deliberately breaking the fast while being capable of fasting?

Whoever intentionally breaks their fast in Ramadan without a valid excuse has committed a major sin and bears great guilt. They must repent, seek forgiveness, refrain from eating and drinking for the rest of the day, and make up for that day after Ramadan.
They have lost an immense reward, which cannot be compensated even by fasting an entire lifetime as a voluntary act, because an obligatory fast cannot be equaled by voluntary fasting.
If the fast was broken through sexual intercourse, the person must:
● Make up for the missed fast (qada), and
● Perform kaffarah by fasting two consecutive months.
● If they are unable to do so, they must feed sixty needy people.

If the bleeding ceases after 40 days following childbirth, but then returns intermittently during two days of fasting, what is the ruling?

 
Praise be to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our Master, the Messenger of Allah.
 
Whenever the post-natal bleeding (Nifas) ceases and the woman is certain it will not return, she has become pure; therefore, she must perform the ritual bath (Ghusl) and resume praying and fasting. However, if the blood returns within fifteen days of its cessation and before sixty days have passed since the delivery, the ruling of Nifas applies once again. Consequently, any fasting or prayer performed during that interval of purity is rendered invalid; she must make up for the missed fasts of those days, but she is not required to make up for the prayers. And Allah the Exalted knows best.