عربي
Home


Resolutions of Iftaa' Board


Resolutions of Iftaa' Board

Resolution No.(132): “Articles (15) and (16) of CEDAW Convention"

Date Added : 27-10-2015

 

Resolution No.(132),(10/2009) by the Board of Iftaa`, Research and Islamic Studies:

“Articles (15) and (16) of CEDAW Convention"

Date: 1/8/1430 AH, corresponding to 23/7/2009 AD.

 

 

 

All perfect praise be to Allah, The Lord of The Worlds; and may His blessings and peace be upon our Prophet Mohammad and upon all his family and companions.

During its session held on the above given date, the Board reviewed articles (15) and (16) from the “CEDAW CONVENTION” which calls for absolute equality between men and women.

The Board has dwelled on the following verse: “And in no wise covet those things in which God Hath bestowed His gifts More freely on some of you than on others: To men is allotted what they earn, and to women what they earn: But ask God of His bounty. For God hath full knowledge of all things.” {An-Nisa`/32}. The Board would like to clarify that the legal is what Allah has made legal and the illegal is what Allah has made illegal. Allah has created both the male and the female, and He is aware of His creation. His law has equalized between men and women in aspects where they are equal such as belief, the right to education, ownership, choosing a spouse, and the like, within the boundaries of Sharia.

He has favored woman over  man in aspects where she had surpassed him, such as the right to child custody in case of separation, because her Fitrah (natural disposition) enables her to raise children. He has also favored her with the right to receive kind treatment from her children.

On the other hand, He has favored man over woman in aspects where he had surpassed her, such as the ability to make a living; therefore, man is obliged to provide for his family. Allah Has also Favored him with the ability to fight, and this is why he is obliged to bear arms to defend his homeland when necessary.

Therefore, whatever violates the rules of Sharia from the “CEDAW CONVENTION” is forbidden and impermissible to put into effect, such as a wife`s freedom in movement and residence, because this undermines the intention behind the concept of the family which Sharia came to protect. Also,  a Muslim woman marrying a non-Muslim man constitutes another violation to the rules of Sharia.

The Board stresses its appreciation to the Supreme Judge`s Department`s stand in rejecting whatever violates the provisions of Sharia from the CEDAW CONVENTION as well as its concern about the family and its related affairs.

The Board hopes that the Jordanian Parliament rejects such legislations which represent a clear violation to Islamic Sharia.

Moreover, it is imperative that every Muslim rejects matters that contradict Allah`s Law. Allah, The Almighty, Says (what means): “the command is for none but God: He hath commanded that ye worship none but Him: that is the right religion, but most men understand not...” {Yousef/40}. And Allah The Almighty Knows Best.

 

 

 

Chairman of the Iftaa` Board, Grand Mufti of Jordan,Dr. Nooh al-Qhodat

Vice Chairman of the Iftaa` Board, 

Dr. Ahmad Hilayel

Sheikh Abdulkareem al-Khasawneh/ Member

Sheikh Sa`eid Hijjawi/ Member

Dr. Mohammad Khair al-Eesa/ Member

Judge Sari al-Ass`ad/ Member

Dr. Abdurahamn Ibbdah/ Member

Dr. Mohammad Okla/ Member

Dr. Abdunnasir Abulbasal/ Member

Executive Secretary of the Board/ Dr. Mohammad Al-Khalayleh

 

Decision Number [ Previous | Next ]


Summarized Fatawaa

My father has debts and asked me to repay them years ago, and I promised him I would do so upon his death — is it permissible for me to go back on my promise given that I am unable to repay them, especially since he refuses to contribute to repayment on the grounds that the debt has become my responsibility by virtue of my promise?

All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master the Messenger of Allah ﷺ.
The established principle is that a father's debt is to be repaid from his own wealth, if he possesses sufficient means. As for the promise made by the son to repay it on his father's behalf, fulfilling such a promise is strongly recommended, and breaking it is considerably disliked. Shaykh al-Islām Imām al-Nawawī, may Allah have mercy upon him, states: "Fulfilling a promise is emphatically recommended, and breaking it is severely disliked. The evidences for this from the Qurʾān and the Sunnah are well known." [Rawḍat al-Ṭālibīn,Vol. 2/P.278] Shaykh al-Islām Imām Zakariyyā al-Anṣārī, may Allah have mercy upon him, further states: "The reason fulfilling a promise is not obligatory and breaking it is not forbidden is that a promise is in the nature of a gift, and a gift does not become binding except upon receipt." [Asnā al-Maṭālib fī Sharḥ Rawḍ al-Ṭālib,Vol. 2/P.487]
Given that the son does not possess the financial means to fulfil his promise to his father, breaking this promise falls beyond his capacity — and Allah does not burden a soul beyond what it can bear. Since the father himself possesses sufficient wealth to settle his own debt, repayment must be made from his own funds. Should he pass away before doing so, the debt is to be settled from his estate. And Allah the Almighty knows best.

Is it obligatory to have an intention (niyyah) for every prayer?

Praise be to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our Master, the Messenger of Allah.
 
It is obligatory for the worshiper to have a specific intention (Niyyah) for every prayer, meaning they must consciously intend the act of worship they are performing. The intention is a pillar (Rukn) of the prayer, and the prayer is not valid without it. It is not a requirement to utter the intention verbally; rather, doing so is considered a recommended Sunnah. And Allah the Exalted knows best.

What is the ruling on eating or drinking forgetfully during the day in Ramadan or during voluntary fasting?

Whoever eats or drinks forgetfully while fasting, whether in an obligatory or voluntary fast, should continue their fast, for it is Allah who has provided them with food and drink. There is no difference between obligatory and voluntary fasting in this ruling.

What should a person, who doubts the validity of his Wudu, or over performs it, do?

One who doubts the validity of his/her Wudu while performing it should redo it until he/she is certain of having attained purity. But, if doubt was after having performed Wudu, then he/she should not pay attention to that as doubt after the end of an act of worship does not count. This is of course in case doubt was within the reasonable limits since once it goes beyond that, it becomes a whispering of the Shaytaan (devil) which he/she should ignore as the Wudu is valid.

See More