عربي
Home


Resolutions of Iftaa' Board


Resolutions of Iftaa' Board

Resolution No.(155): "Ruling on the Loan Conditioned by Making a Fixed Monthly Payment to a Solidarity Fund whose Benefit Goes to the Borrowers"

Date Added : 02-11-2015

 

Resolution No.(155)(20/2010) by the Board of Iftaa`, Research and Islamic Studies:

"Ruling on the Loan Conditioned by Making a Fixed Monthly Payment to a Solidarity Fund whose Benefit Goes to the Borrowers"

Date: 26/12/1431 AH, corresponding to 2/12/2010 AD.

 

 

All perfect praise be to Allah, The Lord of The Worlds; and may His blessings and peace be upon our Prophet Mohammad and upon all his family and companions.

During its eleventh session held on the above date, the Board reviewed the following question:

I`m a government employee and I have received (22000) JDs as a housing loan. Upon collecting that sum, I found out that I should pay (100) JDs as stamps, and that there was a solidarity fund related to the Employees Housing Fund by which (5) JDs are deducted monthly besides the installment, regardless of the loan`s value, which ranges between (15000) and (30000) JDs. It is worth mentioning that the repayment period is (20) years and this applies to all the employees, regardless of the loan`s value. By conclusion, each employee pays (1200) JDs to the solidarity fund over twenty years, knowing that in case an employee dies, this fund pays off all his unpaid installments, regardless of the amount due to the Housing Fund, whether it was (30000) or one JD, and his heirs aren`t liable for repaying any sum.

After thorough deliberations, the Board decided what follows:

The above loan is permissible because the value of the stamps goes to the public treasury, so there is no harm in paying that amount. Moreover, it isn`t usurious because in usury it is a condition that the loan brings profit to the loaner himself; whereas, the value of the stamps goes to the state, not the loaner.

As regards the payments made to the solidarity fund, they are permissible as well, because it enhances solidarity amongst the borrowers. However, each fund should have its independent account so that payments made to the solidarity fund aren`t re-loaned by the Employees Housing Fund. This way eliminates  the suspicion of usury.

It is better that you (questioner) pay the whole amount due to the solidarity fund at the beginning so that nothing gets deducted from the loan or added to it; rather, paying that amount in advance should be a condition for taking the loan. This way, the contract becomes free from the suspicion of usury. We advise participants to pay that amount in advance as a kind of grant or donation. And Allah Knows Best.

 

Head of the Iftaa` Board, The Grand Mufti of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, His Grace Sheikh Abdulkareem Al-Khasawneh

Vice Head of the Iftaa` Board, Dr. Ahmad Hilayel

Dr. Yahia Al-Botoosh/ Member

His Eminence, Sheikh Sa`ied Hijjawi/ Member

Dr. Mohammad Khair Al-Essa

Judge Sarrie Attieh

Dr. Abdulrahman Ibbdah/ Member

Dr. Mohammad Oklah/ Member

Dr. Abduln`nassir Abu Al Bass`al/ Member

Dr. Mohammad Al-Khalayleh/ Member

Dr. Mohammad Al-Gharaibeh/ Member

Executive Secretary of the Iftaa` Board, Sheikh Mohammad Al-Hunaiti

 

 

 

Decision Number [ Previous | Next ]


Summarized Fatawaa

Does buying meat equivalent to the weight of a slaughtered animal and distributing it avail for an udhiyah?

Praise be to Allah, and prayers and peace be upon our Master the Messenger of Allah.
 
That does not avail for the sacrifice (uḍḥiyyah), because the sacrifice necessarily requires slaughtering an animal from the category of anʿām (camels, cattle, and sheep/goats) within a specified time.
 
Rather, that is considered a form of charity (ṣadaqah) for which one is rewarded, but not an udhiyah. And Allah Almighty knows best.

What is the ruling on swearing on the Holy Quran and breaking that oath?

It is impermissible to swear on the Holy Quran in vain, and it is also impermissible to subject it to such an act since breaking the oath after swearing on the Quran entails an expiation.

Is a person rewarded for refraining from all that breaks their fast when required to do so, and is it considered a valid fast?

If a person eats or drinks thinking that Fajr has not yet arrived, but then someone informs them that Fajr had already begun, they must refrain from eating for the rest of the day and make up the fast later.
If they observe the required restraint (imsak), they will be rewarded for obeying the command because fulfilling an obligation brings reward.
However, this is not considered a valid fast in terms of rulings. For example:
● It is not disliked (makruh) for them to use a miswak after noon.
● They are not encouraged to hasten the breaking of the fast at sunset.
● Other fasting-related rulings do not apply to them.

What is the ruling on performing the Witr prayer as a single rak`ah?

Praise be to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our Master, the Messenger of Allah.
 
It is permissible to perform the Witr prayer as a single unit (rak‘ah). It was narrated from Ibn ‘Umar that a man asked the Messenger of Allah ﷺ about the night prayer, and the Messenger of Allah ﷺ replied: 'The night prayer is offered two by two (mathna mathna). If one of you fears the approach of dawn, let him pray a single rak‘ah to make what he has prayed odd-numbered (Witr) for him.' (Related by al-Bukhari & Muslim)). However, limiting the prayer to only one rak‘ah is considered 'contrary to the preferred way' (Khilaf al-Awla).
 
It is stated in Al-Minhaj al-Qawim Sharh al-Muqaddimah al-Hadramiyyah (p. 137): 'The minimum of Witr is one rak‘ah, but limiting it to that is contrary to what is best.'
 
The most complete form of Witr is eleven units, while the minimum level of 'perfection' is three units. It is stated in ‘Umdat al-Salik (p. 60): 'The minimum of Witr is one rak‘ah, and its maximum is eleven, performing the taslim (salutation) after every two units. The lowest level of perfection is three units with two separate taslims (meaning 2+1).' And Allah the Exalted knows best.

See More