عربي
Home


Resolutions of Iftaa' Board


Resolutions of Iftaa' Board

Resolution No.(129): “Re-evaluation of the Amount of Diyah”

Date Added : 27-10-2015

 

Resolution No.(129),(7/2009): “Re-evaluation of the Amount of Diya”

Date: 1/8/1430 AH, corresponding to 23/7/2009 AD.

 

All perfect praise be to Allah, The Lord of The Worlds; and may His blessings and peace be upon our Prophet Mohammad and upon all his family and companions.

During its third session held on the above date, the Board of Iftaa reviewed the amount of Diya in light of the change in the value of camels in Jordanian currency, because twenty-one years passed over the last evaluation, which took place on 9/11/1408 AH, corresponding to 23/6/1988 AD.

 

After thorough studying and deliberating, the Board decided what follows:

 

First: In principle, the Diya is a hundred camels whose ages vary in accordance with the type of killing: premeditated murder, quasi-intentional murder, or accidental killing. In accidental killing, the Diya is a hundred camels: Thirty Bint Makkah, thirty Bint Labun, thirty Hiqqah and ten Bin Labun. This Diya is softened from three aspects: it is due on the killer`s Aqila (Male relatives of the killer from his father`s side), it is divided over three years, and the ages of the camels. In premeditated murder and quasi-intentional murder, the amount of the Diya is a hundred camels: thirty Hiqqah, thirty Bint Labun, and Khilfah. On the other hand, the Diya in quasi-intentional murder is softened from two aspects: it is due on the killer`s Aqila and divided over three years; whereas, it is more dense from one aspect, and that is the ages of the camels.

The Diya in premeditated murder is more dense from three aspects: due immediately, due from the killer`s wealth, and the ages of the camels.

The evaluation of Diya in a form other than camels relied on the value of camels. It was narrated from 'Amr bin Shu'aib, from his father, from his grandfather, that the Messenger of Allah said: "Whoever is killed by mistake, his ransom is one hundred camels: Thirty Bint Makkah, thirty Bint Labun, thirty Hiqqah and ten Bin Labun. "[1] The Messenger of Allah used to fix the value (of the Diya for accidental killing) among town-dwellers at four hundred Dinars or the equivalent value in silver. When he calculated the price in terms of people with camels (for Bedouin), it would vary from one time to another. When prices rose, the value in Dinars would rise, and when prices fell the value in Dinars would fall. At the time of the Messenger of Allah, the value was between four hundred and eight hundred Dinars, or the equivalent value in silver, eight thousand Dirhams. And the Messenger of Allah ruled that if a person's blood money was paid in cattle, among those who kept cattle, the amount was two hundred cows; and if a person's blood money was paid in sheep, among this who kept sheep, the value was two thousand sheep. The Messenger of Allah ruled that the blood money is part of the estate, to be divided among the heirs of the victim according to their allotted shares, and whatever is left over is for the 'Asabah. And the Messenger of Allah ruled that if a woman commits murder then he 'Asahah, whoever they may be, must pay the blood money, but they do not inherit anything except that which is left over from her heirs; if a woman is killed then her blood money is to be shared among her heirs, and they may kill her killer.” [Sunn Abu Dawood], [Sunn Al-Nisa'ee].

Second: As camels aren`t the common property of the people of Jordan, the Board believes that their prices should be estimated in Jordanian currency in order to facilitate for the people to pay the Diyah. The prices of camels can be obtained from the neighboring Islamic countries where camels are common.

Third: The Grand Mufti of Jordan has sent a message to the Chairman of the Islamic Fiqh Academy in Sudan inquiring about the prices of camels there. The latter has formed a committee to that end and informed the Grand Mufti about their prices. It was made clear to us that a hundred camels in addition to the transport fair equal twenty thousand Jordanian Dinars as regards the Diya in accidental killing, and twenty five thousand Jordanian Dinars for that in premeditated and Quasi-intentional killings. Therefore, the Board holds the view that the Diya of whoever is killed by mistake is twenty thousand Jordanian Dinars and twenty five thousand for whoever is killed intentionally or Quasi-intentionally.

Fourth: The Board stresses that the Diya in accidental and quasi-intentional killings is due on the killer`s Aqila; whereas, in premeditated murder it is due from the killer`s wealth.

Fifth: The Board stresses that it is impermissible for the family of the killed to demand both Qisas (Retaliation) and Diya. If Qisas was executed in case of premeditated murder, then no Diya is due on the killer.

Sixth: Recipients of the Diyah may waive their right to take it since Almighty Allah Has Urged Muslims to be forgiving. Whereas, He Says (What means): “And the remission (of the man’s half) is the nearest to righteousness.“ {Al-Baqara/237}. However, none may waive the right of minors in the Diya and such an act isn`t considered lawful.

Seventh: The Diya becomes part of the killed person`s estate and so it should be divided in accordance with the rulings of Sharia on inheritance. And Allah Knows Best.

 

The Grand Mufti of Jordan

                   Chairman of the Iftaa` Board,  Dr. Nooh al-Qhodat

                      Vice Chairman of the Iftaa` Board,Dr. Ahmad Hilayel

                                   Sheikh Abdulkareem al-Khasawneh/ Member

         Sheikh Sa`eid Hijjawi/ Member

                        Dr. Muhammad Khair Al-'Eisa/Member

Judge Sari Attia/Member

              Dr. Abdul-Rahman Ibdah/Member

                           Dr. Muhammad Aiqla Al-Ibrahim/Member

                     Dr. Abdul Naser Abu Al-Basal/Member

                                               Executive Secretary of the Iftaa' Board Dr. Muhammad Al-Khalyla 

 

 

Decision Number [ Previous | Next ]


Summarized Fatawaa

What are the legal and religious consequences for a charitable organization in the event that a sacrificial animal is damaged or spoiled after slaughter?

All praise is due to Allah, and may peace and blessings be upon our Master, the Messenger of Allah.
Charitable organizations entrusted with slaughtering sacrificial animals (uḍḥiyyah) and distributing their meat on behalf of their owners are obligated to safeguard the meat from spoilage, damage, theft, and any other harm. This is because such organizations act as agents (wukalā') on behalf of those offering the sacrifice, and an agent holds what is entrusted to them in trust (amānah) — whether they receive a wage for their work or act on a voluntary basis.
If the sacrificial animal is damaged after slaughter during the processes of packaging, transportation, or storage due to negligence or oversight — whether on the part of the organization's own staff overseeing the operation, or on the part of third parties contracted by the organization such as transport or shipping companies — then liability falls upon the negligent party, who is required to compensate for the value of the sacrifice. It is not permissible to cover such compensation from the organization's other donor funds.
However, if the damage to the sacrificial animal occurs without any negligence in its preservation and storage on the part of any party involved in the transportation, shipping, or storage process, and is instead attributable to force majeure circumstances beyond their control, then no financial liability is borne by any party in such a case. And Allah Almighty knows best.

Is it permissible for a woman to give the ransom (Fidyah) for breaking her fast to her granddaughter (her son`s daughter)?

Praise be to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our Master, the Messenger of Allah.
 
It is permissible for a woman to give the ransom (Fidya) for breaking her fast in Ramadan to her granddaughter (her son’s daughter), provided that the girl is poor and her basic needs are not being met by the maintenance (Nafaqah) of those who are lislamically obligated to provide for her. And Allah the Exalted knows best.

Is it permissible to offer an Udhiyah on behalf of the deceased?

In the Name of Allah, and may peace and blessings be upon our Master, the Messenger of Allah.
 
Offering an Udhiyah (sacrificial animal) on behalf of a deceased person is permissible. This is the official position of the Hanbali school (as stated in Kashshaf al-Qina’ by al-Bahuti,Vol.6/P.428) and was also upheld by the prominent Shafi'i scholar Al-’Abbadi (mentioned in Bidayat al-Muhtaj by Ibn Qadi Shuhbah,Vol. 4/P.358). It has likewise been narrated as a valid view among some Maliki and Hanafi scholars.
 
In fact, Imam Abu Dawud dedicated an entire chapter in his Sunan collection entitled, "Chapter on Sacrificing on Behalf of the Deceased." In it, he recorded a narration from Hanash, who said: "I saw 'Ali sacrificing two rams, so I asked him, 'What is this?' He replied, 'The Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) commanded me to offer a sacrifice on his behalf, so I am sacrificing on his behalf.'"
 
Imam Abu Dawud also narrated from Jabir (may Allah be pleased with him) that the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) said: "O Allah, this is from You, for You, and on behalf of Muhammad and his Ummah (community). In the Name of Allah, and Allah is the Greatest," and he then slaughtered the animal.
 
The textual evidence here lies in the fact that our Master, the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him), offered a sacrifice on behalf of his entire community—and it is well-established that his community includes those who have already passed away.
 
Furthermore, there is an abundance of sacred texts demonstrating that the rewards of righteous deeds reach the deceased. For instance, it is permissible to fast on behalf of a deceased person who passed away with missed obligatory fasts, and it is equally permissible to perform Hajj on their behalf, both of which are firmly established in authentic Hadiths. Therefore, if the reward of fasting (which is a purely physical act of worship) and Hajj (which is a joint physical and financial act of worship) can reach the deceased, then the reward of an Udhiyah reaches them with greater reason (by way of A Fortiori argument). This is because it is a purely financial act of worship, falling under the general category of charity (Sadaqah).
 
Additionally, scholars have reached a consensus (Ijma') that the rewards of charity reach the deceased, and since the Udhiyah is inherently an act of charity, it falls under the same ruling. Consequently, based on all the aforementioned evidence, we hold the view that offering a sacrifice on behalf of the deceased is entirely permissible. And Allah the Almighty Knows Best.

How many Rak`ahs (unit of prayer) are offered in Witr prayer?

All perfect praise be to Allah, The Lord of The Worlds                                                                                                                                                                  Witr (an odd number prayer performed between Isha`a and Fajr) is offered with a minimum of one Rak`ah, and a maximum of eleven, but offering three Rak`ahs is the minimum of its complete form. And Allah Knows Best.

See More