Articles

Competence and Merit are Fundamental Criteria for Appointments
Author : Dr. Mufti AbdulHakim Tawfeeq
Date Added : 23-10-2024

Competence and Merit are Fundamental Criteria for Appointments

 

Introduction

Praise be to Allah, the Lord of the worlds, and blessings and peace be upon the one after whom there is no prophet.

His Majesty King Abdullah II of Jordan released the sixth discussion paper on October 11, 2016, which focuses on the rule of law. This paper includes several topics, all of which establish the principle of the rule of law as a foundation for a civil state. Among the issues discussed in this paper is the principle of merit and the importance of adhering to it in matters of employment. His Majesty stated: "It is essential to adhere to the principle of competence and merit as the fundamental and sole criterion for appointments."

So, what is the meaning of merit, its ruling, its evidence, the benefits of adopting merit, and the consequences of disregarding this standard?

Definition of Merit

Linguistically, "merit" refers to worthiness [1].

Technically, merit refers to "a set of personal attributes in an individual, including professional competence, administrative efficiency, and other qualities that are left to the discretion of the administration [2]." The deserving person is the one who is "most suited for a task and best able to fulfill its requirements [3]."

Article 41, Paragraph (A) of the Jordanian Civil Service Regulation [4] states: "Appointments in civil service positions are made according to the needs approved in job formation tables to ensure the employment of the best competencies based on merit and qualifications."

Ruling on Appointments Based on Merit and Qualifications

It is a religious obligation. Al-Shatibi [5] said: "The grand or minor leadership positions must be entrusted only to those who meet the required conditions, not to just anyone. All other positions follow this principle; the Sharia law demands that these roles be given only to those qualified to perform them." If someone unqualified is appointed, the appointment is invalid. Ibn Abidin [6] mentioned: "If the ruler appoints a teacher who is not qualified, the appointment is invalid. Therefore, it is obligatory for those in charge to appoint suitable individuals to these positions and remove them from those who are not qualified."

Evidences Supporting the Appointment of Qualified Individuals

Evidence for appointing competent individuals can be derived from the Qur'an, the Sunna, the traditions of the Companions, and rational reasoning, as follows:

1- From the Qur'an: Allah Says (What means): "One of the women said, 'O my father, hire him. Indeed, the best one you can hire is the strong and the trustworthy." [Al-Qasas/26]. Al-Nasafi [7] comments that the use of the past tense in "hired" indicates that his strength and trustworthiness were well-established. The phrase "the strong and the trustworthy" is comprehensive, as when these two qualities are combined in the person managing your affairs, your concerns will be relieved, and your goals will be fulfilled.

2- From the Sunna: The Prophet (PBUH) said to Abu Dharr when he asked to be employed: "O Abu Dharr, you are weak, and it is an Amanah (trust), and on the Day of Judgment, it will be a cause of shame and regret, except for those who take it with its due right and fulfill their responsibilities [8]." Al-Nawawi [9] explains that this hadith is a significant principle in avoiding positions of authority, especially for those unable to fulfill their duties. Even though Abu Dharr was trustworthy, the role requires a combination of strength and trustworthiness to be adequately fulfilled.

3- From the Traditions of the Companions: Umar Ibn Al-Khattab (May Allah Be Pleased with him) said: "O people, I have been appointed over you, and if I did not hope to be the best among you, the most capable of handling your affairs, and the most able to bear the weight of your concerns, I would not have accepted this role [10]." Commenting on this, Al-Aqqad [11] noted that the most deserving person to lead is the one most capable of performing the duties of leadership, not merely someone with the right to govern.

Achieving Goals and Interests: Appointing the most qualified individuals is essential for achieving the required objectives in governance and public service. Ibn Taymiyyah stated: "Knowing who is most suitable for the position depends on knowing the purpose of the role and the means to achieve it. The essential goal of leadership positions is to preserve religion and manage worldly affairs in a way that upholds the religion. Therefore, the person who meets the qualifications for the public office must be chosen [13]."

Benefits of Adopting Merit and Qualifications

The success of any administration in implementing its policies largely depends on how well it selects qualified, trustworthy employees and appoints them to positions that match their abilities, qualifications, and readiness [14]. This leads to the following benefits:

1- Improved performance, higher standards, and increased productivity [15]: Relying on merit and qualifications has a significant positive impact on the efficiency of civil service, as it ensures that positions are filled with employees who can perform their duties competently and effectively [16].

2- More effective achievement of goals and completion of tasks with higher quality and lower cost, both in production and in workforce development and training [17].

Consequences of Ignoring the Merit Criterion

Some scholars from the past have recognized the importance of relying on merit and the negative consequences of neglecting it. Among them is Al-Mawardi in his book [Advice to Kings pp.18] where he said: "The king should strive to select his officials—whether ministers, scribes, judges, or governors—from people of religion, reason, trustworthiness, competence, and independence. If a person lacks trust, he will betray. If betrayal occurs in such matters, it may lead to widespread harm or deep-rooted corruption. If a person lacks competence for the responsibilities assigned to him, the work will fall apart and scatter."

Therefore, some of the disadvantages of ignoring the merit criterion can be summarized as follows:

First: Leading to administrative corruption due to the poor selection of employees [19].

Second: Causing unjust equality between a competent employee and an incompetent one [20].

Third: Killing ambition and initiative in the hearts of outstanding employees and weakening their enthusiasm for work [21].

In conclusion, the good or poor selection and appointment of state employees—through applying or ignoring the merit and qualifications standard—directly impacts the state's reputation, dignity, and respect both locally and internationally. As "the public servant is the state's tool and true representation, and people see the state through him [22]."

Our last prayer is that praise be to Allah, The Lord of The Worlds.

 

References:

 [1] Check: Al-Fayrouzabadi, Al-Qamus Al-Muheet, Chapter of Ra, Section of Jeem, Word (J-D-R).

[2] Habish, Fawzi, The Public Employee – His Rights and Duties, p. 87, The Arab Organization for Administrative Sciences, League of Arab States.

[3] Al-Mawardi, Abu Al-Hasan Ali bin Muhammad bin Habib (1983). Advice to Kings (Edited by Khidr Muhammad Khidr), 1st ed., p. 187, Al-Falah Library, Kuwait.

[4] Law No. (82) of 2013 and its amendments up to 1/5/2017.

[5] Al-Muwafaqat, 1st ed., Dar Al-Kutub Al-Ilmiyya, p. 104.

[6] Hashiyat Ibn Abidin, 1st ed., Dar Ihyaa Al-Turath Al-Arabi, vol. 6, p. 266.

[7] Tafsir Al-Nasafi, vol. 3, p. 233, Dar Al-Fikr.

[8] Narrated by Muslim in Sahih Muslim, Book of Governance, Chapter on the Dislike of Leadership Without Necessity, Hadith 1825.

[9] Sahih Muslim with Commentary by Al-Nawawi, vol. 2, p. 166, Dar Al-Fikr.

[10] Al-Aqqad, Abbas, The Genius of Umar, p. 108, Jordanian Family Library, Jordanian Ministry of Culture.

[11] Ibid.

[12] Islamic Governance in Reforming the Ruler and the Ruled, p. 139, 1st ed., Dar Ibn Al-Haytham, Cairo.

[13] Abu Hajir, Majid Mahmoud Saeed, The Rules of Islamic Governance in Appointing State Employees in Islam, p. 82, Dar Al-Thaqafa, Amman.

[14] Habish, Fawzi, Public Employment and Personnel Management (262), p. 81, The Arab Organization for Administrative Sciences, League of Arab States.

[15] Ibid, p. 87.

[16] Ammar, Husni Hassan, Personnel Management, Institute of Public Administration, Saudi Arabia, p. 175.

[17] Yaghi, Dr. Muhammad Abdul Fattah, Ethics in Public Administration, p. 258, No Edition.

[18] Edited by Khidr Muhammad Khidr, 1st ed., Al-Falah Library, Kuwait, p. 187.

[21] Ibid.

[22] Jaafar, Dr. Muhammad Anas Qasim, Fundamental Principles of Public Employment in Islam, Dar Al-Nahda Al-Arabiya, Cairo, p. 13.

 

The published article reflects the opinion of its author

Article Number [ Previous | Next ]

Read for Author




Comments


Captcha


Warning: this window is not dedicated to receive religious questions, but to comment on topics published for the benefit of the site administrators—and not for publication. We are pleased to receive religious questions in the section "Send Your Question". So we apologize to readers for not answering any questions through this window of "Comments" for the sake of work organization. Thank you.




Summarized Fatawaa

Is the Saying "Whatever is Taken by the Sword of Shyness is Forbidden" an Authentic Ḥadīth?

All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master the Messenger of Allah ﷺ.
The saying "Whatever is taken by the sword of shyness is forbidden" is not an authentic ḥadīth, though its underlying meaning is sound. The established sharʿī principle is that a Muslim's wealth is not lawful for anyone to take except with his wholehearted consent, as Allah the Almighty says {what means}: "O you who have believed, do not consume one another's wealth unjustly, but only [in lawful] business by mutual consent." [Al-Nisā/ 29] And the Messenger of Allah ﷺ said: "Listen to me and you will live well: do not wrong others, do not wrong others, do not wrong others. Indeed, a man's wealth is not lawful except with his full, willing consent." (Reported by Aḥmad in his Musnad.) Whatever is taken through the pressure of shyness or social embarrassment runs directly counter to genuine, wholehearted consent.
The jurists have explicitly stated that whatever is taken by means of the "sword of shyness" carries the same ruling as that which is taken by coercion — it must be returned to its rightful owner.
Ibn Ḥajar al-Haytamī, may Allah have mercy upon him, states in al-Fatāwā al-Kubrā (Vol.3/P.30): "Do you not see the reported scholarly consensus that whoever has something taken from him purely out of shyness, without his genuine consent, does not pass ownership of it to the one who took it? They reasoned that this constitutes a form of coercion through the 'sword of shyness,' comparable to coercion at the point of an actual sword. Indeed, many people would rather submit to the literal sword and endure the pain of its wound than submit to this first kind of coercion, out of fear for their dignity and standing — which people of sound judgment hold dear and guard most fiercely." And Allah the Almighty knows best.

Is it acceptable to perform the Aqiqah for a male child by slaughtering and distributing the first sheep, and bringing the second one cooked from the restaurant?

 

Praise be to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master, the Messenger of Allah.

It is permissible to slaughter the first sheep with the intention of Aqiqah (the newborn's sacrificial offering) and distribute it entirely [uncooked], and to slaughter the second sheep and have it cooked at a restaurant to bring home for the household. However, it must be noted that it is obligatory to give some portion of the Aqiqah in charity to the poor, even if it is a small amount, though it is preferable to send the food cooked to them.

Buying a pre-cooked, ready-made sheep from a restaurant does not suffice as an Aqiqah. However, if an agreement is made with the restaurant to explicitly slaughter a sheep with the intention of Aqiqah for the newborn, and then cook it afterward, this is permissible.

In conclusion, slaughtering the sheep and distributing it with the intention of Aqiqah is permissible, and through it, the foundational prophetic tradition (Sunnah) is fulfilled. As for simply buying a cooked sheep from a restaurant that was not specifically slaughtered with the intention of Aqiqah, it will not count as such. Conversely, if the restaurant owner is commissioned (Wakala) to handle both the slaughtering and the cooking as an Aqiqah, it is valid. And Allah the Almighty knows best.

What is the ruling on the follower`s prayer if the Imam stands for a fifth rak`ah?

Praise be to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our Master, the Messenger of Allah.
 
If the Imam stands up for an extra unit (rak‘ah) of prayer out of forgetfulness, he must return to the sitting position as soon as he remembers, and he should perform the prostration of forgetfulness (Sujud al-Sahw). It is the duty of the congregants (Ma’mumin) behind him to remind him. However, if the Imam is in a state of doubt regarding the extra unit (and not certainty), it is not permissible for him to return.
 
As for the congregants: anyone who is certain that the Imam has stood for an extra unit is forbidden from following him. In this case, the follower has two choices: either intend to separate from the Imam (Mufaraqah) and finish the prayer alone, or wait for the Imam in the sitting position and perform the final salams with him—the latter being the preferred option. If a follower knowingly follows the Imam into an extra unit, their prayer becomes invalid. However, if a follower is in doubt and not certain of the mistake, they must continue following the Imam, as the Imam was appointed to be followed.
 
It is stated in Al-Majmu’ (Vol.4/P.145): 'If [the Imam] stands for a fifth rak‘ah, the follower should not follow him, even if it is assumed that the Imam might have omitted a pillar from a previous unit; because if the reality is known, following him is impermissible since the follower has certainly completed their own prayer. Even if the follower had missed a previous unit (Masbuq) or was in doubt about performing a pillar like the Fatihah, and the Imam stood for the fifth, it is not permissible for the latecomer to follow him in it. This is because we know that this unit is not counted for the Imam and that he is mistaken in performing it.' And Allah the Exalted knows best.

Is it permissible for a wife to give her money to her family as a charity, or a gift without asking her husband, or seeking his consent?

The wife has the right to give her money as a charity, or a gift to her family, or to other people after consulting her husband out of respect, and this is the meaning of treating on footing of kindness and equity. Therefore, if he wanted to stop her from helping her family, then there is no harm in not telling him.