عربي
Home


Articles

Articles

Positive Human Participation
Author : Dr. Fadi Rabab`ah
Date Added : 16-01-2024

Positive Human Participation

 

From the beginning of its call, Islamic Sharia has called for adhering to values, extending beyond its initial call in Mecca, reaching far and spreading its goodness to the entire world. This is exemplified by the stance of the Islamic ambassador, Jafar ibn Abi Talib, the cousin of the Prophet (PBUH) and a noble companion. He was sent as an ambassador to the Negus, the ruler of Abyssinia, who followed the Christian faith.

 

This is reflected in the statement of Ja'far ibn Abi Talib, found in [Musnad Ahmad, Hadith No. 1699] and [Sahih Ibn Khuzayma, No. 2073], when he addressed the Negus about their state during the era of ignorance, highlighting their immoral practices and their transformation after the Prophet was sent to them. Ja'far said: "O King, we were a people in the era of ignorance, worshipping idols, consuming carrion, engaging in immoral deeds, severing family ties, and mistreating neighbors. The strong among us would oppress the weak." He continued, "We persisted in this state until Allah sent to us a Messenger whose lineage, truthfulness, trustworthiness, and chastity we knew."

 

Ja'far ibn Abi Talib then explained the values to which the Prophet Mohammad (peace be upon him) invited them. He said: "He invited us to worship Allah alone and abandon what we and our ancestors used to worship besides Him, such as stones and idols. He commanded us to speak the truth, fulfill trusts, maintain family ties, show kindness to neighbors, refrain from unlawful acts and shedding blood. He forbade us from committing immoral deeds, lying, consuming the wealth of orphans, slandering chaste women, and ordered us to worship Allah alone, associating nothing with Him. He commanded us to perform prayers, give zakat, and observe fasting."

 

Then Ja'far described the believers' response to this call, saying: "So we believed in him, affirmed the truth of his message, and followed him in what he brought. We worshiped Allah alone, associating nothing with Him, prohibited what He forbade, and allowed what He made permissible."

He continued, "Our people then transgressed against us, tortured and tempted us to forsake our religion and return to the worship of idols instead of Allah, and to resume the permissibility of what Allah had made forbidden for us."

 

He concluded his speech with wisdom, indicating the reason they sought refuge in Abyssinia, saying, "When they oppressed us, treated us unjustly, made life difficult for us, and stood between us and our religion, we left for your country, choosing you above all others, seeking your protection, and hoping not to be wronged under your rule, O king."

 

So, the Negus turned to the delegation from the Quraysh who came to take back the companions and said, "Go away, by Allah, I will never surrender them to you."

 

The Prophet (peace be upon him) requested his companions to migrate from their land due to the persecution and harm they were facing, ensuring their safety and freedom to choose their beliefs. This underscores the positive and humanitarian engagement of Islam, and its openness to other societies, especially those where justice is upheld. The Prophet (peace be upon him) praised the just rule of the Negus, emphasizing the universal value of justice that respects human beings, their freedom, lives, and ensures fairness. Thus, the Prophet (peace be upon him) acknowledged the justice of the Negus and commended him for it.

 

What confirms the profound positive human engagement of Islam is the Prophet Mohammad`s (peace be upon him) participation in an alliance known as the "Hilf al-Fudul" in Mecca, even before his prophethood and the call to Islam. Its purpose was to support the oppressed, resist injustice, and the Prophet praised this alliance, saying, "I participated with my uncles in a pact at the house of Abdullah ibn Jada'an, which I would not exchange for the choicest camels." (Narrated by Imam Ahmad).

 

The "Hilf al-Fudul" alliance was formed four months after the Sacrilegious wars (Harb-ul-Fijar). The reason behind it was that a man from Zubaid (a town in Yemen) came to Mecca with merchandise, which Al-As ibn Wa'il purchased from him. However, Al-As denied him his rightful due, and the Zubaidi sought justice against him. The nobles of Quraysh did not support him due to the high status of Al-As among them. The Zubaidi sought help at the Kaaba, and appealed to the Banu Fihr and other honorable people. Al-Zubair ibn Abd al-Muttalib asked why this man was left helpless. The Banu Hashim, Zuhra, and Banu Taym ibn Murah gathered at the house of Abdullah ibn Jada'an and prepared a meal for them. They formed an alliance and pledged by Allah to stand as one hand with the oppressed against the oppressor until his right was restored. Then they went to Al-As ibn Wa'il, took back the goods from him, and returned them to the Zubaidi, establishing this alliance known as "Hilf al-Fudul." It was named so because those who participated in it were named Fadl, such as Fadl ibn al-Harith, Fadl ibn Wada'a, and Fadl ibn Fadala.

 

Regarding this alliance, Al-Zubair ibn Abd al-Muttalib says:

They pledged and allied in unity, 

That in Mecca, oppression should not stand. 

Neighbor and guest, both shall be free,

 An oath upon which they firmly band.

 

Islam promotes the value of positive human participation on a global scale and condemns isolationism without necessity. Its call is a universal mercy to all people, as described by Allah in the Quran: "And We have not sent you, [O Muhammad], except as a mercy to the worlds." [Quran, 21:107]. Islam encourages participation in international organizations and humanitarian associations that uphold human rights, people's freedom, and work towards establishing justice while respecting human dignity, in alignment with the values and principles of Islamic law.

 

 

 

 

Article Number [ Previous | Next ]

Read for Author




Comments


Captcha


Warning: this window is not dedicated to receive religious questions, but to comment on topics published for the benefit of the site administrators—and not for publication. We are pleased to receive religious questions in the section "Send Your Question". So we apologize to readers for not answering any questions through this window of "Comments" for the sake of work organization. Thank you.




Summarized Fatawaa

How to perform the witr prayer in terms of connection (wasl) and separation (fasl)?

 
Praise be to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our Master, the Messenger of Allah.
 
The Witr prayer has several forms that vary in terms of virtue:
 
The First Form: Separating every two units (rak‘ah) with a Tashahhud and a Taslim (salutation). This is superior to connecting the units, even if it is only a single rak‘ah. This is based on the Hadith of ‘Aishah (may Allah be pleased with her): 'The Messenger of Allah ﷺ used to pray eleven units between the end of the ‘Isha prayer and dawn, performing the Taslim after every two units and performing Witr with a single unit.' (Related by al-Bukhari & Muslim).
 
The Second Form: Connecting the units with only one final Tashahhud at the very end.
 
The Third Form: Connecting with two Tashahhuds—meaning reciting the Tashahhud before the final unit without performing the Taslim, then standing to complete the final unit. This form is considered the lowest in rank so that the Witr prayer remains distinct from the obligatory Maghrib prayer, as stated in the Hadith: 'Do not make the Witr resemble the Maghrib prayer.' (Narrated by Al-Daraqutni, who stated its narrators are trustworthy).
 
It is stated in Bushra al-Karim Sharh al-Muqaddimah al-Hadramiyyah: 'It is permissible to connect [the Witr] with one Tashahhud in the final unit—which is better—or with two Tashahhuds in the last two units, as both methods are established in Sahih Muslim from the actions of the Prophet ﷺ. In the connected method, more than two Tashahhuds are prohibited. Furthermore, separating (al-Fasl) is better than connecting (al-Wasl) if the number of units is the same, because the Hadiths supporting it are more numerous and it involves more devotional actions.' And Allah the Exalted knows best."

Does using a wet miswak while fasting break the fast?

A fasting person should ensure that the miswak is dry when using it.
However, if the miswak is slightly moist but does not release any liquid when squeezed, then its use does not break the fast.

What is the ruling on offering a sheep as a sacrifice (Udhiyah) if its fat-tail is sound, except that when it was young, the tip of its fat-tail was cut so that it would grow larger? And what is the ruling in case of doubt regarding the amount that was cut?

 
In the Name of Allah, and may peace and blessings be upon our Master, the Messenger of Allah.
 
Cutting a minor, insignificant portion from the tip of an animal's fat-tail (al-alyah) to encourage it to grow larger is not considered a defect, and it does not prevent the animal from being valid for sacrifice (Udhiyah).
 
It is stated in Tuhfat al-Muhtaj (Vol.9/P.352): "There is some scholarly deliberation regarding the common practice of cutting the tip of the fat-tail so that it grows larger. It could potentially be likened to a partial cut of the ear—supported by the jurists' general rule: 'even if it is a small amount.' On the other hand, if it is an exceptionally minor cut, it might have no effect on validity. This is explicitly clarified by the juristic exception to the general rule, which states that cutting a tiny piece from a large limb causes no harm. This latter view is more well-founded.
 
Furthermore, I found that some scholars investigated this matter and concluded: 'It should not affect validity if a custom-sanctioned portion of its fat-tail is removed during its youth to make it grow larger and look better, just as castrating a male animal causes no harm.' However, applying this unconditionally contradicts the established texts of the jurists, as understood from what I have laid out; thus, the restriction I specified is what must be relied upon."
 
Similarly, it is mentioned in Nihayat al-Muhtaj (8/135): "If a small piece is cut from the fat-tail to help it grow larger, the most well-founded view is that the sacrifice remains valid, as was given in a formal legal verdict (Fatwa) by my father [Shihab al-Din al-Ramli], may Allah be pleased with him. This is proven by the jurists' maxim: 'The loss of a tiny piece from a large limb causes no harm.'"
 
In cases where there is doubt as to whether the portion cut was large or small, the animal is still deemed valid for sacrifice. It is noted in Hashiyat al-Shubramallisi ‘ala Nihayat al-Muhtaj (Vol.8/P.135):
 
"This matter requires careful consideration, but the closer and more correct view is that it is valid. This is because soundness is the default state for the animal from which the piece was cut, and it aligns with what usually occurs—namely, that the part removed to help the fat-tail grow larger is naturally very small." And Allah the Almighty Knows Best.

 
What is the ruling on someone who eats or drinks while uncertain about the arrival of dawn, then later finds out that dawn had not yet broken?

If a person does this, their fast remains valid, as it is confirmed that they ate during the night. Similarly, if someone eats while uncertain and remains unsure whether they ate before or after dawn, their fast is still valid. This is based on the maxim of Sharia Law, which states: "Certainty is not removed by doubt." Certainty, here, is the presence of night, and the doubt concerns the arrival of dawn. Therefore, one relies on certainty and disregards doubt.

See More