عربي
Home


Articles

Articles

Islamic Economy (An Introduction)
Author : Dr. Safwan Odaybat
Date Added : 12-09-2022

Islamic Economy (An Introduction)

 

Amidst the increasing economic crises that hit countries every now and then, the recent fall of capitalist economy, the failure of socialism, and the fall of communism in the late eighties, conflicting calls have emerged:

First: A call for the application of an Islamic economic system, encompassing macro and micro levels, doesn`t discriminate between classes, swings between the steadiness of the total principles and the flexibility of the application to the branches. Accordingly, it constitutes a comprehensive system for mankind, deriving its comprehensiveness from the fact that Sharia is applicable to every time and place. 

Second: A call for applying the fittest economic system to mankind, as agreed by countries, be that system capitalist, socialist or mixed. As a matter of fact, there isn`t what is called an Islamic economic system. Rather, there are mere viewpoints and reasoning that impose a certain meaning on texts of Sharia and limited banking experiences that don`t live up to be called an economic system, in addition to failure to find comprehensive developmental solutions.

What is the concept of the Islamic economy? How true is the assumption that there is an Islamic economic system? We will attempt to give an answer through the following:

From a linguistic viewpoint, economy refers to spending between exceeding and falling short. For more details, kindly check [Al-Mohkam Wal Moheet Al-`Adam by Ibn Seedoh, vol.6/pp.186]. As a term, it refers to "The science that investigates all that is related to fortune, money, earnings, possessing, spending, production, investment, services, savings, poverty and richness." [Al-Mo`jam Al-Iktisadi Al-Islami by Dr. Ahmad Al-Shorbasi, pp.36].

 

Leaving such definitions aside, let`s consider some definitions delivered by contemporary scholars of Islamic economy:

 

First: It is impossible that the Sharia, which is eternal and fits for every time and place, lacks general rules and controls for the themes of Economics, such as fortune, investment, production, and the like. This is because these have to do with man`s succession on earth. These elevate life and cause it to continue; however, without them society will return to the life of the jungle and take the path of extinction. Rather, these themes are amongst the requirements for the perfection of Sharia, about which Almighty Allah Said (What means): "This day have I perfected your religion for you, completed My favour upon you, and have chosen for you Islam as your religion." [Al-Ma`idah/3].

 

Second: Demonstrating the greatness and comprehensiveness of Sharia to all aspects of life, including economic terminology, is one method for calling people to the way of Allah. Rather, it is calling to Him with insight and knowledge. This call also needs scholars of economy who are aware of the minutest details of this field and its emerging issues from Sharia, legal, and specialist technical aspects. Their knowledge and experience will enable them to deliver Fatwa, make disciplined Ijtihad, and understand texts using their talent in jurisprudence. We may add that this is a collective obligation.

 

Third: The general rules and the total principles of Sharia are tantamount to a general constitution on which rulings rely. "In terms of jurisprudential principles, the economic policy of Islam is divine, but in terms of application, it is secular." [Thatiyat Al-Siyasa Al-Ektisadiya Al-Islameyah Wa Ahmeyat Al-Ektisad Al-Islamic by Dr. Moh. Shawki Al-Fangari, pp.18]. Consequently, there are many texts of Sharia about the economic policy. For example, Allah The Almighty Says (What means): "And do not eat up your property among yourselves for vanities, nor use it as bait for the judges, with intent that ye may eat up wrongfully and knowingly a little of (other) people’s property." [Al-Baqara/188]. He also Says (What means): "In order that it may not (merely) make a circuit between the wealthy among you." [Al-Hashir/7]. Moreover, narrated a man of the Companions (RA): I went on an expedition with the Prophet (PBUH) and heard him saying: "People are partners in three things: grazing, pasture, water and fire." [Reported by Ahmad and Abu Dawood, and its narrators are reliable (thiqah)]. The Prophet (PBUH) said: "If anyone makes a barren land productive, then it belongs to him." [Reported by Ath-Thalatha. At-Tirmidhi graded it Hasan (good)].

Economic theories that fit to be a just comprehensive economic system for reforming mankind have been established upon these jurisprudential principles.

 

Fourth: We conclude that Islamic economy is "A science that examines whatever is related to fortune, money, earning, possessing, spending, production, investment, services, savings, poverty and richness in light of the principles of Sharia, its total rules, and the Islamic value system."

 

The published article reflects the opinion of its author

Article Number [ Previous | Next ]

Read for Author




Comments


Captcha


Warning: this window is not dedicated to receive religious questions, but to comment on topics published for the benefit of the site administrators—and not for publication. We are pleased to receive religious questions in the section "Send Your Question". So we apologize to readers for not answering any questions through this window of "Comments" for the sake of work organization. Thank you.




Summarized Fatawaa

Is a person who is in a state of Janabah (major ritual impurity due to having a marital intercourse, ejaculation, menstruation, and post-delivery impurities) sinful if he/she goes about his/her daily life activities in that state i.e. without making Ghusl (ritual bath)?

It goes without saying that a Muslim should always be in a state of ritual purity so as to be able to perform prayers and recite Quran. It is from Sunnah (Prophetic tradition) that a Muslim hastens to make Ghusl from Janabah, but he/she is not sinful in case he/she delayed that provided that he/she doesn`t miss prayers. However, it is permissible for him/her to go about their daily activities while in a state of Janabah, but had better bathe in order not to miss any prayer.

What is the ruling if someone wipes his head then shaves it - must he repeat it?

If a person performing ablution shaves his head after wiping it during ablution, he is not required to re-wipe his head or repeat the ablution. And Allah the Almighty knows best.

The Jurisprudential Significance of the Ḥadīth: "Whoever says, at the conclusion of the Fajr Prayer, while crossing his legs, before speaking..."
"Whoever says, at the conclusion of the Fajr prayer, while crossing his legs, before speaking: 'Lā ilāha illā Allāh, waḥdahu lā sharīka lah, lahu al-mulku wa lahu al-ḥamdu yuḥyī wa yumītu wa huwa ʿalā kulli shayʾin qadīr' ten times — ten good deeds will be recorded for him, ten bad deeds will be erased from him, he will be raised ten levels, he will spend that day in protection from everything disliked and guarded from the devil, and no sin will be able to befall him on that day except associating partners with Allah" — does this noble ḥadīth apply to the imam, and what is meant by "extraneous speech"?

All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master the Messenger of Allah ﷺ.
It is recommended for both the imam and those praying behind him to recite, immediately after the final salām, the specific remembrance reported in the sunnah to be said before turning away from one's place of prayer. The imam then leaves his praying spot, and the act of "turning" is fulfilled when the imam faces the congregation — even without physically leaving his spot — by positioning his right side toward them and his left side toward the qiblah, and this applies even while he is engaged in supplication.
Al-ʿAllāmah Ibn Qāsim al-ʿAbbādī states in his Ḥāshiyah ʿalā al-Tuḥfah (Vol.2/P.105): "It is most virtuous for the imam, once he has given the salām, to rise from his place of prayer immediately afterward." He adds that an exception must be made for the remembrances that are specifically required to be recited before he turns away. He then notes, citing Sharḥ al-ʿUbāb: "Yes, an exception to this rising immediately after the salām applies to the Fajr prayer, due to the authentic report that the Prophet ﷺ, when he prayed Fajr, would remain seated until the sun rose." He further cites, from al-Khādim, the ḥadīth concerning one who recites, at the conclusion of the Fajr prayer while still in the position of crossing his leg to rise: "Lā ilāha illā Allāh, waḥdahu lā sharīka lah..." and the rest of the well-known ḥadīth. He comments that this makes explicit that this particular remembrance is to be recited before the worshipper turns his legs to leave, and the same applies to Maghrib and ʿAṣr, as reported in those contexts as well.
What is meant by "speech" in the relevant ḥadīth is extraneous worldly speech that is not called for after the prayer and for which there is no legitimate excuse. The remembrances reported to be recited upon concluding the prayer, however, do not fall under this category of extraneous speech, since they are themselves required by the sharīʿah.
Al-ʿAllāmah ʿAlī al-Shabrāmalsī states in his Ḥāshiyah ʿalā al-Nihāyah (Vol.1/P.551): "If someone greets a person with salām while he is occupied with reciting this remembrance [i.e., 'Lā ilāha illā Allāh...'], should he return the greeting — without this causing him to forfeit the promised reward, since he is engaged in an obligatory matter — or should he delay returning the greeting until he finishes, this being a legitimate excuse for the delay?" He continues: "I say: the more likely view is the former, and the prohibition on speech is to be understood as applying to extraneous speech for which there is no legitimate excuse. Based on this, should the worshipper give precedence to this remembrance ('Lā ilāha illā Allāh...') or to reciting Sūrat al-Ikhlāṣ ('Qul huwa Allāhu aḥad')? This requires consideration, though it is not unlikely that the remembrance takes precedence, given that the Lawgiver urged hastening to it through his words 'while crossing his leg.' This is not considered ordinary speech, since it is not extraneous to what is required after the prayer."
Accordingly, it is recommended for both the imam and those praying behind him to recite this remembrance and to give it precedence over the other remembrances of the prayer, ensuring it is said before they move from their place. And Allah the Almighty knows best.

Is it permissible to agree with a butcher to purchase the meat of an animal after it has been slaughtered — for instance, by buying the meat of a sheep at a price determined by the weight of its meat following slaughter, at a fixed rate per kilogram? And what is the ruling if the animal is being purchased with the intention of it being an uḍḥiyyah (sacrificial offering)?

 
 
 
 
 

All praise is due to Allah, and may peace and blessings be upon our Master, the Messenger of Allah.
It is not permissible to sell livestock in the manner of pricing each kilogram of meat after slaughter at a fixed rate, because the meat within the animal prior to slaughter is unseen and unknown. This leads to jahālah (ignorance of the subject matter) and gharar (contractual uncertainty), both of which are among the invalidating factors in sales transactions.
However, it is permissible for the buyer to issue a promise to purchase the meat of the animal after slaughter at a specified price per kilogram, with the actual sale being concluded at the time of weighing the meat — at which point both the quantity of the goods and the total price become known. There is no Sharī'ah objection to this arrangement.
The jurists have stipulated that for a sale to be valid, both countervalues must be present and observable. Al-Khaṭīb al-Shirbīnī, may Allah have mercy upon him, states:
"It is valid to sell a heap of grain whose total measure is unknown to both contracting parties at a rate of one sā' per dirham. This sale is valid because the subject of sale is present and observable, and ignorance of the total price is not harmful since it is known in detail — and uncertainty is thereby lifted."— [Mughnī al-Muḥtāj, Vol.2/P.355]
As for the uḍḥiyyah, the 'aqīqah, and vowed blood sacrifices (al-dam al-mandhūr) — full ownership of the animal must be established prior to slaughter. It is not valid for such animals to be slaughtered while still in the ownership of the butcher. Rather, the animal must be purchased alive and then slaughtered with the intention of uḍḥiyyah or the like. And Allah Almighty knows best.

See More