عربي
Home


Resolutions of Iftaa' Board


Resolutions of Iftaa' Board

Resolution No.(49) "Ruling on Financing the "Diminishing Partnership" Offered by the Central Bank to its Employees"

Date Added : 16-12-2015

Resolution No.(49): "Ruling on Financing the "Diminishing Partnership" Offered by the Central Bank to its Employees"
Date: 24/4/1422 AH, corresponding to 15/7/2001.

What is the ruling of Islamic Sharia on the diminishing partnership system offered by the Central Bank to its employees?

Answer:

All perfect praise be to Allah, The Lord of The Worlds; and may His blessings and peace be upon our Prophet Mohammad and upon all his family and companions.

Over several sessions, the Board has reviewed the above issue and arrived at the following view:

Employees of Islamic banks and others can obtain dwellings by one of the following formulae:

First: Murabaha in favor of the purchaser where the employee covers the costs of the construction team; whereas, the bank covers the cost of materials which can be bought through the Murabaha transaction so that they become possessed and guaranteed by the bank. This formula can be employed for purchasing a flat or a building in line with the rules of Murabaha.

Second: Istisna` (making on customer`s order). Here, the bank provides the needed financing in line with the conditions of this form of transaction whereby a flat or a building could be built.

However, the formula, in the above question, presented to the Iftaa` Board: "The Diminishing Partnership" and the attached contract differ from a similar contract that had been approved by the Board where the law had defined it as: (The bank participates as a financing partner- partially or completely-in a project of an expected income on basis of agreeing with the other partner that the bank receives a percentage from the net of the actual income while maintaining the right to keep the remaining part of the profit or some of it, to be agreed upon, to cover the original amount of financing it had provided.) 

In other words, the income of the project, which is based on the aforementioned contract, is the one expected upon the conclusion of the contract itself and the determiner of the expected income is the market, after the completion of the project.

First: it isn`t permissible to estimate that revenue in relation to the financing amount provided by the bank, which settles it on basis of the diminished interest, as is the case of the contract presented to the Board. From the perspective of Sharia, that interest is unlawful although it is low.

In order for this formula to become valid, it isn`t correct to calculate the expected revenue in the manner mentioned above; rather, it should be left to the market.

Since the employees desire to have dwellings for residence and since these won`t be offered for leasing, then the Sharia alternative is that a committee of trustworthy and honorable experts estimate the rent of similar premises after the project is finished based on  actual estimation of the prices of similar houses and flats. In conclusion, it is imperative that the contract is rewritten on the basis that draws a distinction between the acceptable and the unacceptable form in Sharia, this is of course if the employee and the bank wish to resort to the above formula "The diminishing partnership", or they can simply resort to other formulae mentioned above. And Allah Knows Best.

 

Chairman of the Iftaa` Board, The Supreme Judge, Sheikh Izuldeen At-Tamimi

Dr. Abdulsalam Al-Abbadi

  Dr. Yousef Ghyzan

Dr. Wasif Al-Bakri

Sheikh Saeid Hijjawi

Dr. Abdulaziz Al-Khayat

Sheikh Na`eim Mujahid

  Dr. Mahmoud Abu Yahia

Sheikh Mahmoud Shewayat

 

Decision Number [ Previous | Next ]


Summarized Fatawaa

Is Zakah (obligatory charity) due on leased property, and how is it calculated?

Zakah isn`t due on the leased property itself, but on the saved income from that property if it reached Nissab (minimum amount liable for Zakah), and a whole lunar year had lapsed over saving it.

What is the ruling of Islamic Law regarding one who purchases a sacrificial animal (uḍḥiyah) and it then develops a defect before slaughter?

Praise be to Allah, and peace and blessings upon our master, the Messenger of Allah.
If a defect that invalidates the sacrifice (uḍḥiyah) arises after its purchase — for example, if one purchased a sound, defect-free animal, and it then developed a limp, blindness in one eye, or a similar defect before slaughter — it does not fulfill the requirement of a valid uḍḥiyah, according to the Shāfi'ī school.
It is stated in Asnā al-Maṭālib fī Sharḥ Rawḍ al-Ṭālib (Vol.1/P.535): "Even if the limp develops [in the animal] while the knife is upon it, it still does not fulfill the requirement, because it is lame at the moment of slaughter — this is analogous to a case where a sheep's leg breaks and one hastens to slaughter it [in that condition]."
The Ḥanbalī school, however, held that if the one offering the sacrifice purchased the animal while it was sound and defect-free, and a defect then befell it afterward, the sacrifice remains valid and there is no obligation to replace it.
It is stated in Masā'il al-Imām Aḥmad, one of the Ḥanbalī reference works (Vol.8/P.4021): "I said: If a person purchases the sacrificial animal while it is sound, and it is then afflicted with illness, blindness in one eye, or a broken limb [before slaughter]? He [Imam Aḥmad] said: It is said that it still fulfills the requirement. Isḥāq said likewise, because he purchased it while sound, and the defect befell it only afterward, so it remains sufficient on his behalf." [End of quote]
Accordingly, a sheep afflicted with a defect that invalidates the sacrifice does not fulfill the requirement of a valid uḍḥiyah — whether the defect arose after purchase or during the slaughter itself — according to the Shāfi'ī school. However, there is no objection to following the Ḥanbalī position on this matter [as a valid alternative]. And Allah, the Most High, knows best.

Is it permissible for the guardian to give Sadaqa (voluntary charity) from the money of the orphans?

It is impermissible for the guardian to donate from the money of the orphans because he is entrusted with the safekeeping of that money, and is prohibited from donating it.

What is the ruling of Islamic Law on wearing energy stones?

All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master the Messenger of Allah ﷺ.
There is no objection to a woman adorning herself with precious and semi-precious stones — such as ruby, carnelian, or the like — so long as these are stones that women customarily wear as adornment.
As for what are known as "energy stones," if they are used with the intention of seeking remedy and healing, then such matters are governed by experimentation and scientific study — which either establishes that they have a tangible effect or does not — and all of this operates by the permission and will of Allah, Glorified and Exalted. If studies or practical experience do establish that such stones carry a beneficial effect upon human health, then there is no objection to using them. They are, after all, part of Allah's creation, much like medicinal substances extracted from plants or derived from other created things — provided that the Muslim does not believe that the stone itself is the source of benefit or harm. It is nothing more than a means among the many means that Allah has placed in this world, and the reality of all affairs belongs to Allah alone. And Allah the Almighty knows best.

See More