عربي
Home


The Fatwa Approach Adopted at the General Ifta' De



Iftaa' Department


The Fatwa Approach Adopted at the General Ifta' Department

Issues of Fiqh (or Islamic jurisprudence) are variable, addressing all practices of people in all life aspects. Muslim scholars wrote down numerous Islamic provisions and legislations allowing the divine wisdom to illuminate people's lives. Those provisions have a solid base for their legislative and jurisprudence stemming from the basic legislation sources: the Holy Quran, Sunnah, Consensus, Analogy and common benefits. This Fiqh heritage has been collected in four Islamic schools of thought (Madhaheb): Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi'i and Hanbali. It is agreed upon those schools (madhaheb), and they are accepted as the path to achieve Allah's blessings and to protect the welfare of people and countries.
Since the General Department of Al Ifta' has been a part of the scientific progress for the general Fiqh movement, it decided to adopt one of those four schools as a base for its Fatawa (answers) in order to achieve the benefits and goals of the Fiqh movement in the Islamic history. Those goals include:
1.  Being safe with Allah and in the Day of Judgment by not changing anything permitted by Allah in Islam.
2. Achieving moderation which is a fundamental in the Islamic Shari’a and has been a constant in the heritage of the Islamic Fiqh.
3. Avoiding contradicting sayings and abnormal views which may cause flaws in practical and intellectual life.
4. Regulating fatwa and eliminating useless disagreements as much as possible. 
5. Assisting Muftis (people who provide Fatwa) to learn the Islamic legislations easily as it may take a life time for a Mufti to study and give fresh rulings on every issue he is asked about. Thus, learning the fatwa of previous muftis is an inevitable solution.
Al Iftaa Department has chosen the school of Al Imam Al Shafi'i as a base to which it refers in providing fatwa for two reasons:
1. It is the most common school (Madhhab) in our countries in history. Following the majority and what is common is a goal.
2. It is a moderate school/Madhhab gathering between the foundations of schools of thought and hadith. This Madhhab originated Fiqh innovations which have been and still a cause in achieving the interests of the nation and unifying Muslims. Noteworthy that this cause has been achieved by other schools/Madhaheb but Al Imam Al shafi'i’s school/Madhhab has been leading in this field.
The Department of Ifta'a's commitment to this Madhhab doesn't mean absolute imitation of all the innovations of the Faqihs (experts in Islamic jurisprudence), but the department has its advanced approach in benefiting from all items and topics in other schools/madhaheb taking into consideration the following:
1. If the case is related to a contemporary issue not mentioned in previous fatwa/innovations by Faqihs, or if it is one of the general topics important to the society or the nation as a whole, either in financial transactions, medical issues or others, then Al Iftaa Department must prepare special studies to research the issue within the frame of the evidence in the Shari’a law and Fiqh rules. In addition, it tries to balance the cons and pros to conclude a fatwa to be presented to the Iftaa Council. The Council holds discussions in order to reach a decision about the needed issue.
2. If the innovation of the Shafi'i Madhhab concerning a certain issue was not corresponding to the changing time, place and conditions in the time when the question is raised for the Mufti, this matter may cause troubles. The Department of Al Iftaa re-searches the question in line with the Fiqh rules and Shari’a goals benefiting from the innovations of all Islamic schools/Madhaheb in order to issue the fatwa which is the closest to the Shari’a rules and purposes.
3. In personal status or issues like marriage, divorce, heritage and custody of children, the Department of Ifta'a refers to the Jordanian Personal Status Law in its Fatwas to avoid any difference between Iftaa and Legitimate Law in the Kingdom. The law however is based on the innovations and opinions of Muslim Faqihs, selected according to Shari’a disciplines by specialized committees.
In that ways the muftis deal with the questions sent to them through different communication methods, according to regulated and coordinated steps starting from identifying the type of question and ending with sending the answer as soon as possible. However, any delay might be caused by the detailed study for tens of issues handled by Al Iftaa Department on a daily basis especially that Muftis know that they will be asked by Allah about every word they write, thus they prefer not to be hasty in issuing fatwa and answering questions.  

Summarized Fatawaa

What is the ruling on wiping the front of the head beneath the ḥijāb, and is it permissible to wipe over the ḥijāb if it was put on while in a state of purification (wudu`)?

All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master the Messenger of Allah ﷺ.
It is permissible to wipe the front portion of the head (nāṣiyah) with the fingertips. It is likewise sufficient to place a wet hand over a head covering (ḥijāb), provided the moisture actually reaches the hair beneath it — if it does not, it does not suffice. A head covering is not treated in the same manner as leather socks (khuff) and may not be wiped over in lieu of the head itself.
Imām al-Nawawī, may Allah have mercy upon him, states in al-Majmūʿ (Vol.1/P.407): "If a person is wearing a turban and does not wish to remove it — whether for a valid reason or otherwise — he should wipe the entire front portion of the head... The same ruling applies to whatever a woman wears on her head. If, however, he confines himself to wiping over the turban without wiping any part of the head itself, this does not suffice — and there is no disagreement among us on this point." He further states: "A woman is like a man in the manner of wiping the head... She should insert her hand beneath her head covering so that the wiping falls upon the hair itself. If she places her wet hand over her head covering, our scholars stated: if the moisture does not reach the hair, it does not suffice her." And Allah the Almighty knows best.

What are the pillars of fasting?

The pillars of fasting are intention and abstaining from all nullifiers of fasting from dawn to sunset.

What is the ruling on offering a sheep as a sacrifice (Udhiyah) if its fat-tail is sound, except that when it was young, the tip of its fat-tail was cut so that it would grow larger? And what is the ruling in case of doubt regarding the amount that was cut?

 
In the Name of Allah, and may peace and blessings be upon our Master, the Messenger of Allah.
 
Cutting a minor, insignificant portion from the tip of an animal's fat-tail (al-alyah) to encourage it to grow larger is not considered a defect, and it does not prevent the animal from being valid for sacrifice (Udhiyah).
 
It is stated in Tuhfat al-Muhtaj (Vol.9/P.352): "There is some scholarly deliberation regarding the common practice of cutting the tip of the fat-tail so that it grows larger. It could potentially be likened to a partial cut of the ear—supported by the jurists' general rule: 'even if it is a small amount.' On the other hand, if it is an exceptionally minor cut, it might have no effect on validity. This is explicitly clarified by the juristic exception to the general rule, which states that cutting a tiny piece from a large limb causes no harm. This latter view is more well-founded.
 
Furthermore, I found that some scholars investigated this matter and concluded: 'It should not affect validity if a custom-sanctioned portion of its fat-tail is removed during its youth to make it grow larger and look better, just as castrating a male animal causes no harm.' However, applying this unconditionally contradicts the established texts of the jurists, as understood from what I have laid out; thus, the restriction I specified is what must be relied upon."
 
Similarly, it is mentioned in Nihayat al-Muhtaj (8/135): "If a small piece is cut from the fat-tail to help it grow larger, the most well-founded view is that the sacrifice remains valid, as was given in a formal legal verdict (Fatwa) by my father [Shihab al-Din al-Ramli], may Allah be pleased with him. This is proven by the jurists' maxim: 'The loss of a tiny piece from a large limb causes no harm.'"
 
In cases where there is doubt as to whether the portion cut was large or small, the animal is still deemed valid for sacrifice. It is noted in Hashiyat al-Shubramallisi ‘ala Nihayat al-Muhtaj (Vol.8/P.135):
 
"This matter requires careful consideration, but the closer and more correct view is that it is valid. This is because soundness is the default state for the animal from which the piece was cut, and it aligns with what usually occurs—namely, that the part removed to help the fat-tail grow larger is naturally very small." And Allah the Almighty Knows Best.

Is it permissible for someone with a physically demanding job, such as a baker or construction worker, to break their fast?

It is not permissible for someone with a physically demanding job to start the day intending to break their fast. They must make the intention to fast at night and begin fasting. However, if they reach a point where fasting becomes unbearably difficult, they may break their fast and make up for it later.

See More