عربي
Home


Articles

Articles

The Reality of Faith (Al-Iman)
Author : Dr. Hassan Abu_Arqoub
Date Added : 30-03-2026

The Reality of Faith (Al-Iman)

 

Allah the Almighty sent the Archangel Gabriel (Jibril) to ask the Prophet ﷺ essential questions as a means of teaching the Ummah. Among these was the pivotal question: "What is Iman (Faith)?" To understand our religion, we must take a focused look at the meaning of faith and the scholarly nuances surrounding it.

In essence, Iman is the heart’s internal conviction (Tasdiq) in everything brought by our Master Muhammad ﷺ that is "necessarily known to be part of the religion" (Ma’lum min al-din bi al-darurah). These are matters so fundamental that they require no complex deduction, such as the obligation of Prayer, Fasting, Zakat, and Hajj, or the prohibition of usury, adultery, gambling, injustice, and alcohol.

Iman is the very first obligation upon a morally and legally responsible person (Mukallaf). Its foundation is the heart’s affirmation, free from doubt or hesitation, coupled with "submission and compliance" (Idh’an) to the truth of the Prophet’s message.

The primary evidence that faith is an act of the heart is Allah’s statement: "Those—He has written faith in their hearts." [Al-Mujadilah/22]. This verse, among many other textual proofs, demonstrates that the true location of faith is the heart.

One might ask: What about the famous definition by some scholars that faith is "speech by the tongue, conviction by the heart, and action by the limbs"?

The answer is that this is a description of the perfection of faith (Kamal al-Iman), not its minimum requirement for validity (Asl al-Iman). While the heart’s conviction is the root, the declaration of the Two Testimonies (Shahadatayn) and the performance of good deeds are the fruits that complete and perfect it.

Pronouncing the Shahadah is a condition for applying worldly legal rulings to a person (such as marriage, inheritance, and burial in Muslim cemeteries). It is not technically a "part" or "pillar" of the internal reality of faith itself.

The Mute or Incapable: If someone truly believes in their heart but is physically unable to speak (due to a condition like being mute), they are saved in the sight of Allah.

The Silent Believer: If a person recognizes the truth and submits in their heart but passes away before anyone asks them to testify—provided they weren't stubborn or refusing—they are a believer before Allah, though they were not treated as Muslims in this life because they never voiced their belief.

The Stubborn Refuser: If someone is asked to testify and refuses out of arrogance or spite (without a valid excuse like fear), they are considered a disbeliever, as their refusal indicates a lack of internal submission.

Born Muslims: A person born to Muslim parents who believes in their heart but neglects to verbally recite the Shahadah is a "sinful Muslim" because they neglected a secondary obligation, but they remain within the fold of Islam.

As Imam Ibn Hajar al-Haytami explained in Al-Tuhfah: "Faith, according to the theologians, has two perspectives: salvation in the Hereafter—which depends solely on internal conviction—and the application of worldly rulings—which depends on the verbal testimony."

Good deeds are not a pillar of faith's existence, but they are the cause of its increase and strength. Faith is dynamic; it increases with obedience and decreases with sin, but the "root" (the conviction in the heart) does not vanish simply due to a sin. Allah says: "The believers are only those who, when Allah is mentioned, their hearts become fearful, and when His verses are recited to them, it increases them in faith..." [Al-Anfal/2].

Based on this understanding, a person who falls short in their religious duties (like someone who misses prayer out of laziness) is not a disbeliever as long as they do not deny that the prayer is obligatory. Similarly, someone who commits a sin (like drinking alcohol out of weakness) is not a disbeliever as long as they do not claim that the sin is "permissible" (Halal). They remain a believer, though their faith is deficient and they are in need of repentance.

Article Number [ Previous | Next ]

Read for Author




Comments


Captcha


Warning: this window is not dedicated to receive religious questions, but to comment on topics published for the benefit of the site administrators—and not for publication. We are pleased to receive religious questions in the section "Send Your Question". So we apologize to readers for not answering any questions through this window of "Comments" for the sake of work organization. Thank you.




Summarized Fatawaa

Who is responsible for performing the aqiqah?

All praise is due to Allah, and may peace and blessings be upon our Master, the Messenger of Allah.
The one upon whom the 'aqīqah is incumbent is whoever is obligated to financially maintain the newborn — whether the father, paternal grandfather, or mother. It is to be performed from their own wealth, not from the wealth of the newborn child.
As for one upon whom the financial maintenance of the newborn is not obligatory, they may not perform the 'aqīqah except with the permission of the one upon whom it is obligatory — namely, the father. And Allah Almighty knows best.

What is the ruling on combining more than one intention in the prayer, such as combining the *sunnah* of wuḍūʾ with the pre-Dhuhr *sunnah*, or combining the *sunnah* of greeting the mosque (*taḥiyyat al-masjid*) with the pre-Dhuhr *sunnah*?

All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master, the Messenger of Allah.
Combining two intentions in a single act of worship, which some jurists call the “overlapping of acts of worship”, has several cases and precise rules. These can be consulted in the books of legal maxims, such as al-Manthūr fī al-Qawāʿid al-Fiqhiyyah by al-Zarkashī and al-Ashbāh wa’l-Naẓāʾir by al-Suyūṭī. Among the most important of these rules:
First: If all of the acts of worship that one wishes to combine under one intention are obligatory, the intentions do not overlap. An example is combining the intention of the obligatory ʿAṣr prayer with that of the obligatory Dhuhr prayer. The intentions do not overlap in this case.
Second: If the two acts are specified supererogatory prayers (nawāfil muqayyadah) that are aimed at in themselves because of a particular time, occasion, or cause, or if they are an obligatory prayer and a specified supererogatory prayer, the intentions again do not overlap. An example is the Duha prayer, which may not be combined with, for instance, the regular sunnah of Dhuhr.
It is stated in Bushrā al-Karīm: “Whatever is not, in meaning, an absolute voluntary prayer, such as the Duha sunnah… is not subsumed under another. Rather, if he intends something else along with it… the prayer is not validly entered. This is because combining two obligations, two specified supererogatory prayers, or an obligation and a specified supererogatory prayer invalidates the prayer in cases not built upon overlapping, as ritual purification (ṭahārah) is.”
Third: If the two acts are absolute voluntary prayers (nawāfil muṭlaqah), or one of them is, where the texts of the Sharīʿah show that the aim of the voluntary act is to fill the time with worship, then overlapping of intentions is permissible. An example is the obligatory Dhuhr prayer together with the sunnah of greeting the mosque (taḥiyyat al-masjid). And Allah Almighty knows best.

What is the ruling of Islamic Law on working in hotels?

All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master, the Messenger of Allah.
It is permissible to work in hotels, restaurants, and shops in jobs that involve no direct handling of forbidden things and do not assist in them, such as administrative work.
As for jobs in which one directly handles forbidden things or assists in them, such as serving, transporting, or purchasing alcohol, receiving payment for it, or agreeing to buy it, working in them is forbidden, based on the saying of Allah the Mighty and Majestic: “And cooperate in righteousness and piety, but do not cooperate in sin and aggression. And fear Allah; indeed, Allah is severe in penalty.” [al-Māʾidah/2]
The basic nature of the work of hotels and restaurants is permissible, and the sin of any forbidden element that arises incidentally in some of what takes place in a hotel or restaurant is borne by those who run it.
The scholars have also permitted dealing with one whose lawful wealth is mixed with unlawful wealth, as previously explained in Fatwa no. (2697). And Allah Almighty knows best.

What is the ruling of Islamic Law on someone who wakes up in a state of janābah (major ritual impurity) near the very end of the prayer's designated time, during cold weather — should he heat water in order to perform ghusl, even though the prayer's time will expire as a result, or should he perform tayammum instead?

All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master, the Messenger of Allah ﷺ.
If the water is cold, and cannot be used due to fear of harm that is not ordinarily tolerable, or that would result in illness, then in this case it becomes obligatory to heat the water — even if heating it causes the time for Fajr to expire — and no sin is incurred in doing so, due to his valid excuse. He may not resort to tayammum (dry ablution) instead, since water remains available [and merely needs to be heated].
Imam Shihāb ad-Dīn Aḥmad ar-Ramlī (raḥimahullāh) said: "He was asked regarding a person who, if he were to use cold water, would experience harm that permits tayammum, and who has access to something with which he could heat the water — but if he heats it, the prayer's time will expire. Is it obligatory for him to heat it even if the time expires, or should he pray with tayammum within the prescribed time? He answered that it is obligatory for him to heat the water, even if the time for that particular obligatory prayer expires." [Fatāwā ar-Ramlī, Vol.1/P.98]
Imam al-Bājūrī (raḥimahullāh) said in his Ḥāshiyah on Sharḥ Ibn Qāsim (Vol.1/P.173): "And if he fears [harm] from using cold water, and is currently unable to heat it, but knows of a place where firewood is available, such that if he were to go there he would not return until after the prescribed time has expired — what appears [to be the correct position] is that it is obligatory for him to go and seek the firewood, even if the time expires as a result, as this is the position ultimately settled upon by ar-Ramlī, and as related from him by Ibn Qāsim." And Allah, the Exalted, knows best.

See More