عربي
Home


Articles

Articles

Giving the Road its Due
Author : Dr. Mufti Sa`eid Farhan
Date Added : 08-10-2024

 

Praise be to Allah, the Lord of the Worlds, and peace and blessings be upon His Messenger. Afterwards:

Islamic law has meticulously organized the life of a Muslim, encompassing all aspects of their life. It has clarified the rights and duties, boundaries, and relationships between people.

One of the matters addressed is the rights related to the road. These rights were given significant attention due to their central role in people's lives. The road is a public utility, not owned by anyone nor monopolized by any individual. Because of this, Islamic law established rules and principles that organize the rulings of the road, which are evident through the following manifestations:

The First Manifestation: Preserving the cleanliness of the road, maintaining it, and repairing it:

This is evident through the following:

First: Maintaining the road is considered a branch of faith. The Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) said: "Faith has over seventy—or sixty—branches, the best of which is the declaration that there is no god worthy of worship but Allah, and the least of which is removing harm from the road, and modesty is a branch of faith." [Moslim]. Imam Al-Nawawi, in explaining the meaning of "removing harm" said: "It means clearing it away and removing it. Harm refers to anything harmful, such as stones, dirt, or thorns, or anything else." [Sharh Al-Nawawi Ala Moslim: Vol.2/P.6].

The Second manifestation: The Porhibition of violating road:

Islamic law has promised great reward for removing harm from the road. The Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) said: "While a man was going along the path he found a thorny branch upon it. He pushed it to a side and Allah approved (this action) of his and (as a mark of appreciation) granted him pardon." [Al-Bukhari] He also said: "I have seen a man going about in paradise as a reward for cutting down a tree which was overhanging a road and annoying people." [Moslim]. The word "going about in Paradise" means taking pleasure. Thus, the outcome of removing harm from the path of Muslims was that Allah admitted him into Paradise. And what does a Muslim seek from their actions more than getting admitted into Paradise?

Abu Barzah Al-Aslami said: I asked: "O Prophet of Allah, teach me something that will benefit me." He said: "Remove harm from the path of Muslims." [Moslim].

These noble hadiths and others highlight the great virtue and immense reward for this branch of faith.

The Second Manifestation: Prohibition of harming the road:

This is illustrated by the following:

First: Prohibition of anything that harms the road. Scholars, when explaining the hadith "The Rights of the Road," emphasized that a Muslim must refrain from harming the road. Just as removing harm from the road is a charity for which a Muslim is rewarded, harming the road is a sin for which a person is accountable. Warning against harming others, Imam Muhammad Al-Khuli said: "Pouring water on the road until feet slip, placing obstacles in the path where pedestrians may stumble, or throwing garbage or thorns that could harm passersby, or narrowing the road with one's seating where neighbors are bothered, exposing their women, and restricting their freedom—all of this is harm that must be stopped, and efforts made to keep it away from pedestrians." [Al-Adab Al-Nabawi/Vol.1/P.71].

Scholars have derived from texts encouraging care for the road that anything harmful to the road is prohibited. In his explanation of the hadiths about the virtue of removing harm from the road, Imam Al-Ayni, said: "It indicates that placing thorns, stones, waste, or harmful water in the road, or anything that harms people, may lead to punishment in this world and the hereafter." [Umdat Al-Qari/Vol. 13/P. 23].

Second: The prohibition of encroaching on the road. Anything that constitutes an encroachment on the road is prohibited by Islamic law and considered among the evil acts. Imam Al-Ghazali listed some examples of road encroachments under the chapter "Evils of Streets" saying: "Among the common evils is placing columns or building raised platforms connected to private properties, planting trees, extending balconies, placing wood or grain loads on the roads. All of this is wrong if it leads to narrowing the road or harming pedestrians, even if it causes no harm at all." [Ihya Ulum Al-Din/Vol.2/P.339].

The Third Manifestation: Organizing road regulations in the books of Islamic jurisprudence:

The jurists have extensively organized road regulations, leaving nothing unaddressed. They provided detailed explanations to resolve disputes among people and prevent conflicts. Anyone who studies their detailed rulings and jurisprudential foundations—especially in the chapter of reconciliation—will notice the significant attention given to the subject by the jurists. The hadith scholars also categorized sections in their compilations related to the rights of the road, as Imam Muslim did in his "Sahih" where he titled a section: "Chapter on the Right of Sitting on the Road is to Return the Greeting."

One of the reasons for their emphasis was the warning of the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) when he said: "Beware of sitting on the roads." They said: "We have no choice, they are our gathering places where we talk." He said: "If you must sit there, then give the road its rights." They asked: "What are the rights of the road?" He said: "Lowering the gaze, refraining from harm, returning the greeting, enjoining good, and forbidding evil." [Agreed upon].

We ask Allah, The Almighty, The Lord of The Mighty Throne, to make us among those who listen to good words and follow the best of them.

And all praise is due to Allah The Lord of The Worlds.

 

The published article reflects the opinion of its author

Article Number [ Previous | Next ]

Read for Author




Comments


Captcha


Warning: this window is not dedicated to receive religious questions, but to comment on topics published for the benefit of the site administrators—and not for publication. We are pleased to receive religious questions in the section "Send Your Question". So we apologize to readers for not answering any questions through this window of "Comments" for the sake of work organization. Thank you.




Summarized Fatawaa

How to perform the witr prayer in terms of connection (wasl) and separation (fasl)?

 
Praise be to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our Master, the Messenger of Allah.
 
The Witr prayer has several forms that vary in terms of virtue:
 
The First Form: Separating every two units (rak‘ah) with a Tashahhud and a Taslim (salutation). This is superior to connecting the units, even if it is only a single rak‘ah. This is based on the Hadith of ‘Aishah (may Allah be pleased with her): 'The Messenger of Allah ﷺ used to pray eleven units between the end of the ‘Isha prayer and dawn, performing the Taslim after every two units and performing Witr with a single unit.' (Related by al-Bukhari & Muslim).
 
The Second Form: Connecting the units with only one final Tashahhud at the very end.
 
The Third Form: Connecting with two Tashahhuds—meaning reciting the Tashahhud before the final unit without performing the Taslim, then standing to complete the final unit. This form is considered the lowest in rank so that the Witr prayer remains distinct from the obligatory Maghrib prayer, as stated in the Hadith: 'Do not make the Witr resemble the Maghrib prayer.' (Narrated by Al-Daraqutni, who stated its narrators are trustworthy).
 
It is stated in Bushra al-Karim Sharh al-Muqaddimah al-Hadramiyyah: 'It is permissible to connect [the Witr] with one Tashahhud in the final unit—which is better—or with two Tashahhuds in the last two units, as both methods are established in Sahih Muslim from the actions of the Prophet ﷺ. In the connected method, more than two Tashahhuds are prohibited. Furthermore, separating (al-Fasl) is better than connecting (al-Wasl) if the number of units is the same, because the Hadiths supporting it are more numerous and it involves more devotional actions.' And Allah the Exalted knows best."

What is the ruling on having an intention (Niyyah) for every prayer?

Praise be to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our Master, the Messenger of Allah.
 
Intention (Niyyah) is a pillar (Rukn) without which the prayer is not valid. The worshiper must have an intention for every prayer, meaning they must consciously intend the act of worship they are performing. Its timing must coincide with the opening Takbir (Takbirat al-Ihram). It is not a requirement to utter it verbally; rather, doing so is considered a recommended Sunnah. There are three levels of intention:
 
1-If the prayer is obligatory (Fard): It is mandatory to include the Intent (to pray), the Specification (which prayer, e.g., 'Asr), and the Obligation (recognizing it as a Fard). For example, one should bring to mind or say: 'I intend to pray the Fard of 'Asr.'
 
2-If it is a voluntary prayer restricted by a specific time or cause (Sunnah Muqayyadah): It is mandatory to include the Intent and the Specification. For example: 'I intend to pray the Sunnah before Zuhr' or 'I intend to pray Duha.'
 
3-If it is an absolute voluntary prayer (Nafl Mutlaq): It is sufficient to simply have the Intent to pray. For example: 'I intend to pray.'
 
And Allah the Exalted knows best.

What are the conditions for a valid Udhiyah?

Praise be to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master, the Messenger of Allah.
 
First: The age of the animal must meet the Sharia requirements. These requirements vary depending on the type of sacrifice:
 
Camels: Must have completed five years and entered their sixth.
 
Cows: Must have completed two years and entered their third.
 
Goats: Must have completed two years and entered their third. As for Sheep, they must have completed one year and entered their second.
 
Some scholars have permitted goats that have completed one year and entered their second.
 
The Hanafi school, along with an opinion in the Maliki school, permits sacrificing sheep that are at least six months old, provided they are healthy and physically substantial. According to the Shafi’i school, it is permissible if the sheep sheds its front teeth (ajdha') before reaching one year [Al-Iqna’, by Al-Shirbini (Vol.2/P.588)].
 
Second: Soundness and freedom from defects. The animal must be free from any defect that causes a decrease in its meat or market value. This is based on the hadith narrated by Al-Bara' bin 'Azib, that the Prophet (peace be upon him) said:
 
"Four [defects] are not permissible in sacrifices: A one-eyed animal whose blindness is evident, a sick animal whose illness is evident, a lame animal whose lameness is evident, and an emaciated animal that has no marrow in its bones." [Reported by Abu Dawood and Al-Tirmidhi, who graded it as authentic].
 
These defects are detailed as follows:
 
Evident Lameness: It is not permissible to sacrifice a lame animal if the lameness is severe enough to prevent it from walking to the pasture or seeking food, as this leads to a decrease in its meat. However, slight lameness that does not hinder its grazing is overlooked.
 
Evident Blindness (One-eyed): It is not permissible to sacrifice a sheep, cow, or camel that has a white film over its eye blocking light, or one that has lost an eye entirely. Weak vision that does not affect its ability to eat does not prevent the sacrifice from being valid.
 
Evident Illness: An animal with a clear sickness that prevents it from eating or moving is not valid. This includes severe mange (Jarab) that spoils the meat.
 
Extreme Emaciation: An animal so thin that there is no marrow left in its bones is invalid. The standard for emaciation that invalidates the sacrifice is that which spoils the quality of the meat to the point that people would find it undesirable even in times of plenty.
 
Additional Considerations:
These are the defects mentioned in the Prophetic tradition, and any defect that causes emaciation or reduces the meat or value is compared to them by analogy. This includes animals that are mentally unstable (diseased), those with mange, or those with a missing ear. In contrast, a slit or pierced ear does not affect the validity of the sacrifice. And Allah the Almighty knows best.

Is the one offering the sacrifice liable if its meat spoils?

Praise be to Allah, and prayers and peace be upon our Master the Messenger of Allah.
 
If the meat (of the sacrifice) spoils due to the negligence of the one offering the sacrifice in preserving it, or due to improper storage, then he is liable to compensate for the portion due to the poor (which is estimated as half a kilogram of meat). If the sacrifice was a vowed (mandatory) one, then he is liable for all of it.
 
However, if he was not negligent, then there is no liability upon him, because its ruling is the ruling of a trust (like an item left in someone's care). And Allah Almighty knows best.

See More