عربي
Home


Articles

Articles

The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Drafting Religious Edicts (Fatwas)
Author : Dr. Mousa Za`atreh
Date Added : 09-01-2024

The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Drafting Religious Edicts (Fatwas)

 

 

 

Introduction:

 

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is considered one of the modern technologies characterized by rapid advancement and significant impact in various fields[1]. Among these fields are religious edicts (fatwas) and legal rulings, as they hold a crucial place in the lives of Muslims who seek religious consultations and guidance in various aspects of their life. The influence of artificial intelligence has affected the dissemination and formulation of religious edicts by providing reputable and specialized references in Islamic jurisprudence. Therefore, in this article, we will explore the impact of artificial intelligence on the spread and formulation of religious edicts.

 

Definition of Artificial Intelligence:

 

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is a branch of computer science and a fundamental pillar that underlies current technological advancements. It involves computers simulating intelligent processes that occur within the human mind. The term Artificial Intelligence, often abbreviated as (AI), can be defined as the capability of machines and digital computers to perform specific tasks that mimic and resemble those carried out by intelligent beings[2].

 

Artificial Intelligence refers to the ability of computer devices and programs to execute tasks resembling activities performed by humans. It involves deducing conclusions from data and making intelligent decisions based on algorithms [3] and machine learning. Artificial Intelligence technologies include machine learning, deep learning [4], natural language processing [5], data analysis, and pattern recognition.

 

The impact of artificial intelligence on the dissemination of religious edicts (fatwas):

Artificial intelligence facilitates access to Sharia-related information and answers by analyzing and processing the vast amount of available religious information in books, articles, and previous fatwas. Using machine learning techniques, artificial intelligence can provide quick and accurate religious answers to users and inquirers.

 

However, artificial intelligence has both advantages and disadvantages:

 

Among the advantages of artificial intelligence on religious edicts (fatwas) are:

 

1-Artificial intelligence enables the categorization and organization of religious edicts (fatwas) and legal rulings based on topics, scholars, and references. This allows individuals searching for specific fatwas or legal rulings to easily find information, efficiently navigate reputable sources, and engage directly with religious authorities and respected scholars. This interaction can occur through chat platforms or smart bots, allowing individuals to pose questions and receive direct and immediate answers.

 

2-Another advantage is the capability of artificial intelligence to translate and localize religious edicts and legal rulings from various languages into the user's language. This feature provides a broader and more comprehensive understanding of religious information and offers religious guidance in different languages [6].

 

3-AI enables the spread of religious edicts by allowing individuals easy access to numerous sources of fatwas, whether through online platforms or available applications. It enables effective data browsing and searching, making fatwas and religious information more widely and rapidly accessible to everyone.

4-In the era of modern technology, individuals face the challenge of verifying the accuracy of information received from various sources. AI provides Muslims with the means to verify the authenticity of information, enhancing their ability to distinguish between reliable and unreliable sources.

 

Among the disadvantages of artificial intelligence on religious edicts (fatwas) are:

 

1-Artificial intelligence has some negative impacts, especially when it comes to issuing religious edicts and dealing with religious texts. Its deficiency in human-like comprehension makes it challenging to understand the nuances of context and intricate details in religious queries. The skill of comprehending the context and conducting a deep analysis of religious texts, essential for issuing accurate fatwas, is considered a distinctive capability of scholars and religious authorities. For instance, in cases of divorce rulings, these require dialogue with the involved parties and a deep understanding of the wording used, including gauging emotional states. Divorce having taken place may be a reality, but the results from artificial intelligence may not reflect it accurately.

 

2-The use of artificial intelligence may lead to the abandonment of the human aspect, with questions and answers being handled automatically. This could result in the loss of the intellectual and interpretive dimension that distinguishes scholars and experts, especially in financial disputes. Such disputes often require hearing from the opposing party, expressing opinions that may lead to entirely different fatwas compared to those generated by artificial intelligence.

 

3-There are some biased and suspicious platforms for issuing religious edicts that may contradict the consensus of different Islamic schools of thought. Artificial intelligence is not capable of discerning the abnormal or the least preponderant opinion (fatwa) within a particular school of thought. This can lead to confusion in religious edicts, as providing fatwas and offering religious guidance requires deep knowledge in Islamic sciences, understanding the cultural and social context of the inquirers. AI may lack the human aspect and personal experience, thus unable to apply personal considerations that involve direct human interaction.

 

4-Disregard for Jurisprudential Principles: This type of artificial intelligence may not consider the foundational principles in religious edicts. It might mix the principles of different schools of thought, leading to confusion in fatwa issuance. The AI lacks the capability for independent reasoning (ijtihad) and deduction in issuing rulings on specific issues. Instead, it merely compiles the principles of the issue from multiple sources and forms an answer to the question posed to it, irrespective of the correctness or incorrectness of the answer from a religious perspective.

 

5-Despite these potential effects, artificial intelligence is a human effort that has supplied it with information, making the human role limited to providing references. It offers users a perspective on a specific topic and should not be considered an absolute judgment excusable before Allah. It is essential to verify the information produced by artificial intelligence by referring to scholars. It is crucial to emphasize that artificial intelligence can be a tool for disseminating both correct and incorrect religious edicts. Caution is advised, especially in issuing religious edicts, to preserve the human dimension and the necessary cultural and ethical considerations for providing comprehensive and balanced religious edicts.

 

 

 

[1] Artificial Intelligence: Principles and Applications, by Dr. Sami Al-Harbi, p. 16.

[2] Artificial Intelligence Methods, by Ahmed Hani Hammad, p. 1.

[3] An algorithm is a set of mathematical and logical steps needed to solve a specific problem. The term "algorithm" is named after the scientist Abu Ja'far Muhammad ibn Musa al-Khwarizmi, who invented it in the ninth century AD.

[4] Deep learning is a method in artificial intelligence that teaches computer systems to process data in a way inspired by the human brain. Deep learning models recognize complex patterns in images, texts, sounds, and other data to produce accurate insights and predictions.

[5] Natural Language Processing: It is a machine learning technique that enables computer systems to interpret, process, and understand human language.

[6] Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Education, by Mariam Shoukry Abdel Rahman, p. 5 (approximate translation).

 

 

 

 

Article Number [ Previous | Next ]

Read for Author




Comments


Captcha


Warning: this window is not dedicated to receive religious questions, but to comment on topics published for the benefit of the site administrators—and not for publication. We are pleased to receive religious questions in the section "Send Your Question". So we apologize to readers for not answering any questions through this window of "Comments" for the sake of work organization. Thank you.




Summarized Fatawaa

What is the ruling on the prayer of one who said "Subḥāna Rabbiya al-ʿAẓīm" in prostration (*sujūd*) and forgot to correct it?

 

All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master, the Messenger of Allah.
Saying “Subḥāna Rabbiya al-ʿAẓīm” in bowing (rukūʿ) and “Subḥāna Rabbiya al-Aʿlā” in prostration (sujūd) is one of the hayʾāt (non-essential sunnahs) of the prayer. Whoever omits it, whether deliberately or by forgetfulness, or replaces it with another remembrance (dhikr), his prayer is valid and he does not perform sujūd al-sahw. Shaykh al-Islām Imam al-Nawawī (may Allah have mercy on him) said: “Our school holds that one does not prostrate for omitting the audible or silent recitation, the tasbīḥ, and the rest of the hayʾāt.” [al-Majmūʿ, Vol.4/p.127]
If he performs sujūd al-sahw for something that does not call for it, his prayer is invalidated, because he introduced a prostration of forgetfulness without a cause, and he must repeat the prayer. The exception is one who did so out of forgetfulness or ignorance, whether because he recently entered Islam or because he lives far from scholars; he is excused and his prayer is not invalidated.
It is stated in Mughni al-Muḥtāj (Vol.1/p.417): “It is stated in al-Anwār: If he does something that does not call for sujūd al-sahw, thinking that it does, and then prostrates, his prayer is not invalidated if he is ignorant because he recently entered Islam or because he is far from scholars.”
Since this issue is hidden from the laity, as it is among the subtleties of knowledge, and the laity are excused for ignorance of whatever is of such a nature, and their act of obedience is not invalidated because of it, it may be said that the prayer of one who has not acquired knowledge of the issue is not invalidated. As for after knowing it, the prayer is invalidated.
Whoever realizes while still in the prayer that his prostration was out of place, it is sunnah for him to perform sujūd al-sahw. And Allah Almighty knows best.

What is the ruling of Islamic Law on a person who abandons prayer after reaching puberty—is he required to make them up?

All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master, the Messenger of Allah.
 
Making up missed obligatory prayers is an Islamic duty just as performing them in their proper time is obligatory, and taking care of them takes precedence over performing voluntary prayers. This is established by the practice of our Supreme Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) when the polytheists distracted him on the Day of the Trench from performing the Asr prayer, so he made it up afterward, as well as the Hadith: "Pay Allah what is due to Him, for Allah is most deserving of fulfillment." (Recorded by Al-Bukhari)
 
Furthermore, it is valid to make up missed prayers at any time.
 
Whoever has missed a number of prayers and does not know their exact count, it is obligatory upon them to sincerely repent and exert their utmost effort to estimate their number. If they are unable to determine the exact count, they should base it on what is most probable according to their best judgment. They should then make them up gradually; if one performs one missed prayer alongside every current obligatory prayer, the matter becomes easy and manageable, and with the passage of time, one will complete what is owed, Allah willing. And Allah Almighty knows best.

What is the ruling on men wearing rings (those made of silver and of other metals, such as iron), and are there conditions for men wearing rings?

All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master, the Messenger of Allah.
It is sunnah for men to wear a silver ring on the right hand, following the practice of the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him). It is reported in Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī, on the authority of Anas ibn Mālik (may Allah be pleased with him), that the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) took a silver ring and had “Muḥammad Rasūl Allāh” engraved on it. He said: “I have taken a ring of silver and had ‘Muḥammad Rasūl Allāh’ engraved on it, so let no one engrave the like of its engraving.”
It is a condition that the silver ring not exceed the size customary in the local norm (ʿurf). If it does, that is extravagance (isrāf). A ring made of a metal other than silver, such as iron or copper, is permissible to wear without disapproval (karāhah), except gold, which is forbidden (ḥarām) for a man to wear.
It is stated in Mughnī al-Muḥtāj (Vol.1/p.586): “It is permissible, without disapproval, to wear a ring of iron or lead. It is sunnah for a man to wear a silver ring on the little finger of his right or left hand. Wearing it on the right is better, and it is permissible on the left, and on both together.”
It is also stated in Mughnī al-Muḥtāj (Vol.2/p.97): “It is lawful for him, that is, the man, and likewise the khunthā (person of indeterminate sex), indeed all the more so, to wear a ring of silver, by consensus (ijmāʿ), because the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) took a ring of silver, narrated by the two Shaykhs (al-Bukhārī and Muslim). Wearing it is in fact sunnah, whether on the right or the left, though the right is better according to the sound position, as stated in the chapter on clothing in al-Rawḍah… The Shāfiʿī jurists did not specify the permitted size of the ring, and they probably relied on custom (ʿurf), that is, the custom of that country and the habit of people of his standing in it. Whatever exceeds that is extravagance, as they said regarding a woman’s anklet. This is the reliable position (al-muʿtamad).” And Allah Almighty knows best.

Is it permissible for a guardian (Big brother) to unlawfully stop his sister from getting married?

If the guardian denies her right in getting married for an unlawful reason, she should go to court in order to settle that matter, and the guardian is considered sinful in this case.

See More