عربي
Home


Resolutions of Iftaa' Board


Resolutions of Iftaa' Board

Resolution No.(267): "Ruling on Claiming the Legal Interest"

Date Added : 31-12-2018

Resolution No. (267) (21/2018) by the Board of Iftaa`, Research and Islamic Studies:

"Ruling on Claiming the Legal Interest"

Date: (05/Rabi` Rabīʿ al-Thaani/1440 AH), corresponding to (13/12/2018).

 

All perfect praise be to Allah The Lord of the Worlds and may His peace and blessings be upon our Prophet Mohammad and upon all his family and companions.

On its fourteenth session held on the above date, the Board reviewed letter No.4/5/1-8/11/2018, which reads: I would like to bring to Your Grace`s attention the fact that the Ministry has never claimed the legal interest which usually results from filing lawsuits against debtors. Debtors` non-adherence to making payments on time has inflicted harm on creditors. Debtors are actually benefiting from the Waqf`s wealth, taking hold of it (Waqf) and paying off debts at their own convenience since they aren`t forced to pay interest as a penalty for their procrastination. Resolution (55),7/11/2001 of the Iftaa` Board allowed collecting the legal interest as a compensation for harm, not as a usurious interest. In addition, the Court of Cassation (Supreme Court) has issued some resolutions confirming that this interest is a compensation for harm. In light of this, could Your Grace discuss this issue with the Iftaa` Board to consider the permissibility of claiming the legal interest resulting from the lawsuits filed by the Ministry; in accordance with the following criteria:

1. The Ministry's Legal Department presents a report that shows that the debtor is rich and is intentionally delaying the payment of the debt.

2.  The Ministry`s Council is entitled to cancel the whole interest or part of it depending on each case.

3.  Transfereing the value of the interests to the Waqf programs approved by Sharia in order to be spent on the eligible categories.

After deliberations, the Board arrived at the following resolution:

The legal interest imposed by some laws on the debtor who fails to pay off debts on time is usury/Riba, and thus unlawful for a Muslim to claim or benefit from. Calling it a compensation doesn`t change the fact that it is usury/Riba. This is confirmed by Resolution No.(2/6) of the International Islamic Fiqh Academy, which states: "It is unlawful for the rich debtor to delay paying off due payments. Nevertheless, it isn`t permissible to stipulate that he gives a compensation against this procrastination."

Sharia doesn`t punish procrastination by imposing an interest on debt although it is unlawful for the rich to delay paying off due debt. This is particularly when it comes to public Juris, such as the properties of the Awqaf and the orphans. At the same time, it isn`t permissible for individuals or institutions to claim the legal interest.Rather, the creditor should take the necessary measures (Guarantees) to collect his money with avoiding procrastination on the part of the debtor. Allah, the Almighty, Said (What means): "but God hath permitted trade and forbidden usury." {Al-Baqarah, 275}. Jabir said that Allah's Messenger (PBUH) cursed the accepter of interest and its payer, and one who records it, and the two witnesses, and he said: They are all equal. And Allah Knows Best.

 

Chairperson of Iftaa` Board,

Grand Mufti of Jordan,

Dr. Mohammad Al-Khalayleh

Sheikh Abdulkareem AlKhasawneh/ Member

Sheikh Sa`eid Al-Hijjawi/ Member (I have a reservation about this resolution for it involves harm and loss of benefit)

Prof. Abdullah Al-Fawaaz/ Member

Dr. Muhammad Khair Al-Issa/ Member

Dr. Majid Al-Darawsheh/ Member

Prof. Adam Noah/ Member

Judge. Khaled Al-Worikat/ Member (I have a reservation about this resolution).

Dr. Ahmad Al-Hasanat/ Member

Dr. Mohammad Al-Zou`bi/ Member

Dr. Rashaad Al-Khilaani


 

Decision Number [ Previous | Next ]


Summarized Fatawaa

Is it permissible for a woman to uncover her face while performing Umrah (minor Hajj)?

The woman while in a state of Ihram (ritual consecration) is obligated to uncover her face and hands, but at the same time permitted to let her head-covering garment drape from her head down over her face when non-Mahram (i.e., marriageable) men pass by her. And Allah Knows Best.

What is the ruling of Islamic Law on speaking with one's fiancée (before the marriage contract) by telephone and WhatsApp?

All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master, the Messenger of Allah.
Before the marriage contract, the two engaged persons remain non-mahram (strangers) to one another. Reciting al-Fātiḥah, receiving some money on account of the dowry (mahr), or accepting a gift are all merely a promise of marriage and not a valid contract under the Sharīʿah.
It is therefore forbidden for the engaged couple, before the marriage contract is concluded, to be alone together (khalwah) or to shake hands. It is likewise forbidden to speak by telephone or correspond without need. And Allah Almighty knows best.

What is the ruling of Islamic Law on compensating the patient in case of medical error on the part of the treating physician?

 
All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master, the Messenger of Allah.
 
The foundational principle is that every mistake issued by a physician that causes harm to another due to his negligence or lack of expertise obligates him to guarantee liability and compensate the harmed party. The Sharia maxim, in this regard, states: "The direct actor is liable."
 
Ibn Qudamah (may Allah have mercy on him) says: "As for if he was skilled but his hand committed an error—such as exceeding the proper limit of incision, cutting in an incorrect site, cutting with an instrument that inflicts excessive pain, or cutting at an unsuitable time—he is liable, because it is destruction (Itlaf) whose liability does not differ between intent and mistake, thus resembling the destruction of property; and because it is a prohibited act, so he guarantees liability for its secondary effects." [Al-Mughni].
 
However, if the physician performed what was necessary in the most complete manner and took all measures of care and caution, but complications occurred that could not be avoided according to specialists, then no liability rests upon him.
 
Shaykh al-Islam Imam al-Nawawi (may Allah have mercy on him) says: "The cupper and the circumciser bear no liability if they have not been negligent, and likewise the veterinarian if he bleeds an animal and it perishes." [Rawdat al-Talibin].
 
Al-Khattabi (may Allah have mercy on him) said: "I know of no disagreement that if the practitioner transgresses and the patient perishes, he is liable. Anyone who undertakes knowledge or practice he does not know is a transgressor; so if perishing arises from his action, he is liable for the blood-money (Diyah) while capital retaliation (Qisas) is dropped from him, because he did not act independently without the patient's permission. And the physician’s offense in the view of the generality of jurists is borne by his agnates ('Aqilah*)."* [Ma'alim al-Sunan].
 
If negligence or transgression is established against the physician, it is necessary to compensate the patient or seek forgiveness from him. And Allah Almighty knows best.

What is the ruling on water present on the floor of a toilet/bathroom?

The default ruling is the purity of this water present on the bathroom floor. If one is certain or strongly suspects its impurity, then one washes whatever part of the body or clothing this impure water has touched. If one doubts its impurity, the default is purity, and we do not rule it impure based on mere doubt. And Allah the Almighty knows best.

See More