Articles

"I Don't Know" Is Half of Knowledge
Author : Dr. Fadi Rabab`ah
Date Added : 17-09-2026

"I Don't Know" Is Half of Knowledge

At a time when some people feel embarrassed to say "I don't know" when asked about certain matters — regarding this as a sign of ignorance or a blow to their standing — Islamic Sharī‘ah actually requires the Muslim to speak only about what he genuinely knows. Allah, the Exalted, says {what means}: "And do not pursue that of which you have no knowledge. Indeed, the hearing, the sight, and the heart — about all those [one] will be questioned" [al-Isrā'/36]. Ibn ‘Abbās (raḍiyallāhu ‘anhumā) said, explaining this verse: "Do not say 'I saw' when you did not see, 'I heard' when you did not hear, or 'I knew' when you did not know." [Tafsīr al-Qurṭubī, Vol.5/P.123]

Saying "I don't know" about matters one genuinely has no knowledge of is, in fact, a sign of self-respect and integrity. It reflects an avoidance of deceiving or misleading others, who might otherwise suffer harm or embarrassment as a result. It also guards against invalid conclusions across the full range of issues connected to matters of creed ('aqīdah), sharī‘ah rulings, and the social, educational, psychological, medical, and professional sciences — all fields in which verification, accuracy, and the avoidance of error are essential.

To establish the soundness and positive nature of saying "I don't know," the Noble Qur'an points out that the prophets, peace be upon them, themselves used to say this very phrase regarding matters on which Allah, the Exalted, had not revealed knowledge to them. This is reflected in Allah's words {which mean}: "But if they turn away, then say, 'I have announced to [all of] you equally. And I know not whether near or far is that which you are promised'" [al-Anbiyā'/109]. As explained in Tafsīr al-Baghawī: "'And I know not' — meaning, I do not know — 'whether near or far is that which you are promised' — referring to the Day of Resurrection." Similarly, Allah says {what means}: "And I know not; perhaps it is a trial for you and enjoyment for a time" [al-Anbiyā'/111] — meaning, "I do not know." And Allah says {what means}: "Say, [O Muḥammad], 'I am not something original among the messengers, nor do I know what will be done with me or with you. I only follow that which is revealed to me, and I am not but a clear warner'" [al-Aḥqāf/9] — meaning, "I do not know."

The Messenger of Allah ﷺ, when asked about certain matters, would himself say: "I do not know, until I ask Jibrīl [Gabriel]." Among such instances: a man once asked the Prophet ﷺ which places on earth are best, and which are worst. He ﷺ said: "I do not know, until I ask Jibrīl, peace be upon him." So he asked Jibrīl, who said: "I do not know, until I ask Mīkā'īl [Michael]." Mīkā'īl then came and said: "The best of places are the mosques, and the worst of places are the marketplaces." [Related by Ibn Ḥibbān, 1599]

Among such instances as well is what he ﷺ said to Umm al-‘Alā' (raḍiyallāhu ‘anhā), when she said: "‘Uthmān ibn Maẓ‘ūn came to us by lot for lodging, when the Anṣār drew lots for the lodging of the Muhājirūn (Emigrants). He then fell ill, and we nursed him until he passed away. We then wrapped him in his garments, and the Messenger of Allah ﷺ came to visit us. I said: 'May Allah's mercy be upon you, Abū as-Sā'ib — I bear witness that Allah has surely honored you.' The Prophet ﷺ said: 'And how do you know that?' I said: 'I do not know, by Allah.' He ﷺ said: 'As for him, certainty [i.e., death] has come to him. I do indeed hope good for him from Allah — yet by Allah, even though I am the Messenger of Allah, I do not know what will be done with me, nor with you.'" Umm al-‘Alā' said: "By Allah, after that, I never again declared anyone [definitively] pure [of sin]." [Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī, 7018]

 ‘Alī ibn Abī Ṭālib (raḍiyallāhu ‘anh) said: "Part of a man's knowledge is that he says, regarding what he does not know, 'Allah knows best' — for Allah, the Mighty and Majestic, said to His Messenger ﷺ: 'Say, I do not ask you for it any payment, and I am not of the pretentious'" [referring to Sūrat Ṣād/86]. He also said: "Among the most soothing things for the heart is that a man, when asked about something he does not know, says: 'Allah knows best.'"

Ibn ‘Abbās (raḍiyallāhu ‘anhumā) said: "When the scholar abandons saying 'I don't know,' his most vital point [i.e., his intellectual integrity] has been struck." On the authority of Ibn ‘Umar (raḍiyallāhu ‘anhumā), he said: "Knowledge is of three kinds: a speaking Book [the Qur'an], an established Sunnah, and 'I don't know.'" Mālik [ibn Anas] said: "It used to be said: when the scholar neglects to say 'I don't know,' his most vital point has been struck."

The Messenger of Allah ﷺ — the leader of the Muslims and master of all the worlds — would sometimes be asked about a matter and would not answer until revelation came to him from the heavens. Ash-Sha‘bī said: "'I don't know' is half of knowledge." [al-Ādāb ash-Shar‘iyyah wal-Minaḥ al-Mar‘iyyah, by Ibn Muflih, Vol.2/P.58]

Neglecting to say "I don't know" when one genuinely lacks knowledge negatively affects a person's life and conduct across various domains — whether religious, humanitarian, medical, or professional — leading people into sin, embarrassment, and harm. It also exposes anyone who speaks on such matters [without knowledge] to sharī‘ah accountability, legal liability, and financial responsibility for any damage resulting from their hesitant, unfounded speech. This is based on the words of the Messenger of Allah ﷺ: "Whoever issues a fatwā without sound basis, its sin falls upon the one who issued it." [Related by Abū Dāwūd (3657), Aḥmad (8266), and Ibn Mājah (53)]

Likewise, the Messenger of Allah ﷺ said: "Whoever practices medicine without being known to possess medical knowledge is liable [for any resulting harm]." [Related by Abū Dāwūd (4586), an-Nasā'ī (4830), and Ibn Mājah (3466)]

The scholar Ibn Farḥūn al-Mālikī (raḥimahullāh) said: "As for when the physician is ignorant, or acts beyond what he was authorized to do due to error, or exceeds the permitted limits of his authorization, or falls short of the required standard — he is liable for whatever damage results from that." [Tabṣirat al-Ḥukkām, Vol.2/P.340]

Imam al-Khaṭṭābī (raḥimahullāh) said: "I know of no disagreement [among scholars] that if a treating physician oversteps [his bounds] and the patient is harmed as a result, he is held liable." [Ma‘ālim as-Sunan, Vol.4/P.39]

From all of the above, it becomes clear that a person's saying "I don't know," regarding matters he genuinely has no knowledge of, does not diminish his scholarly standing — rather, it strengthens his credibility and drives him to seek further knowledge, in keeping with what Allah, the Exalted, instructed His noble Messenger ﷺ to say: "And say, 'My Lord, increase me in knowledge'" [Ṭāhā/114]. This is because knowledge varies from one person to another, as Allah, the Exalted, says {what means}: "And above every possessor of knowledge is one [more] knowing" [Yūsuf, /76]. Qatādah said, in explaining this verse: "[This continues] until knowledge ultimately reaches Allah — from Him it began, and from Him the scholars learned, and to Him it shall return." [Tafsīr al-Qurṭubī, Vol.4/P.213]

A Muslim, then, should never hesitate to say "I don't know" when he genuinely lacks knowledge, understanding, or familiarity with a matter he is asked about.

The published article reflects the opinion of its author

Article Number [ Previous ]

Read for Author




Comments


Captcha


Warning: this window is not dedicated to receive religious questions, but to comment on topics published for the benefit of the site administrators—and not for publication. We are pleased to receive religious questions in the section "Send Your Question". So we apologize to readers for not answering any questions through this window of "Comments" for the sake of work organization. Thank you.




Summarized Fatawaa

What is the ruling of Islamic Law on following the actions of the imam in prayer and how this following is achieved?

Praise be to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master, the Messenger of Allah.
The follower (ma'mum) is required to follow his imam in the actions of the prayer. This "following" (mutaba'ah) means that the follower performs each action of the prayer after the imam has begun it but before he has finished it. For example, the follower bows (in ruku') after the imam has reached the position of bowing, then rises after the imam has risen. The Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, said: "The imam is only appointed to be followed, so when he says the takbir, say the takbir; and when he bows, then bow; and when he prostrates, then prostrate" (agreed upon, i.e., reported by both al-Bukhari and Muslim).
It is stated in Mughni al-Muhtaj (1/505): "Among the conditions of valid congregational prayer (iqtida') is following the imam in the actions of the prayer... meaning that following the imam is obligatory in the physical actions of the prayer, not in its verbal utterances... Complete following (kamal al-mutaba'ah) is achieved when the follower's beginning of an action comes after the imam's beginning of that same action, while the follower's beginning of the action precedes the imam's completion of it" — end of quote, with slight paraphrasing.
And Allah, the Exalted, knows best.

What is the ruling on offering a sheep as a sacrifice (Udhiyah) if its fat-tail is sound, except that when it was young, the tip of its fat-tail was cut so that it would grow larger? And what is the ruling in case of doubt regarding the amount that was cut?

 
In the Name of Allah, and may peace and blessings be upon our Master, the Messenger of Allah.
 
Cutting a minor, insignificant portion from the tip of an animal's fat-tail (al-alyah) to encourage it to grow larger is not considered a defect, and it does not prevent the animal from being valid for sacrifice (Udhiyah).
 
It is stated in Tuhfat al-Muhtaj (Vol.9/P.352): "There is some scholarly deliberation regarding the common practice of cutting the tip of the fat-tail so that it grows larger. It could potentially be likened to a partial cut of the ear—supported by the jurists' general rule: 'even if it is a small amount.' On the other hand, if it is an exceptionally minor cut, it might have no effect on validity. This is explicitly clarified by the juristic exception to the general rule, which states that cutting a tiny piece from a large limb causes no harm. This latter view is more well-founded.
 
Furthermore, I found that some scholars investigated this matter and concluded: 'It should not affect validity if a custom-sanctioned portion of its fat-tail is removed during its youth to make it grow larger and look better, just as castrating a male animal causes no harm.' However, applying this unconditionally contradicts the established texts of the jurists, as understood from what I have laid out; thus, the restriction I specified is what must be relied upon."
 
Similarly, it is mentioned in Nihayat al-Muhtaj (8/135): "If a small piece is cut from the fat-tail to help it grow larger, the most well-founded view is that the sacrifice remains valid, as was given in a formal legal verdict (Fatwa) by my father [Shihab al-Din al-Ramli], may Allah be pleased with him. This is proven by the jurists' maxim: 'The loss of a tiny piece from a large limb causes no harm.'"
 
In cases where there is doubt as to whether the portion cut was large or small, the animal is still deemed valid for sacrifice. It is noted in Hashiyat al-Shubramallisi ‘ala Nihayat al-Muhtaj (Vol.8/P.135):
 
"This matter requires careful consideration, but the closer and more correct view is that it is valid. This is because soundness is the default state for the animal from which the piece was cut, and it aligns with what usually occurs—namely, that the part removed to help the fat-tail grow larger is naturally very small." And Allah the Almighty Knows Best.

If a woman becomes pure from menstruation before the Fajr Adhan in Ramadan, is she required to fast?

If a woman becomes pure (from menstrual period) before the Fajr Adhan, she must fast, as the impediment preventing her from fasting has been removed. The Sharia maxim in this regard states: "When the impediment is removed, the obligation returns."
She should then make the intention to fast before Fajr and perform ghusl (ritual purification) for prayer, whether before or after Fajr.

I have a brother who is harsh in his dealings [with me], and many problems have occurred between us, and I do not intend to reconcile with him. What is the ruling of Islamic Law on that?

All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master, the Messenger of Allah.
It is not permissible for a Muslim to abandon or boycott his fellow Muslim brother for more than three days. This is based on the saying of the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him: "It is not lawful for a Muslim to forsake his brother for more than three [days], meeting each other but one turns away and the other turns away, and the better of the two is the one who initiates the greeting (salam)." (Reported by al-Bukhari.)
A Muslim must strive to end such estrangement (hajr), so as not to fall under the prohibition mentioned in the hadith. If he takes the initiative to reconcile but the other party does not respond, then there is no sin upon him. We remind [ourselves] of the saying of Allah, the Exalted: "And let them pardon and overlook. Do you not wish that Allah should forgive you? And Allah is Forgiving and Merciful." (An-Nur/22). And Allah, the Exalted, knows best.