Resolutions of Iftaa' Board



Resolutions of Iftaa' Board

Resolution No.(26): “Diya and its Rulings“

Date Added : 28-10-2015

Resolution  No.(26): “Diya and its Rulings“

Date: 25/6/1413 AH corresponding to 19/12/1992 AD

The Board has received the following question:
What is the value of Diya (blood money) and what are the rulings pertaining to it?
Answer: All success is due to Allah.
The Board has determined the following:
A- Value of Diya
1- In principle, the value of Diya is a hundred camels. However, it is permissible to assess its value according to the currency of the country where the verdict was issued.
2- The value of camels is calculated according to their minimum price in the Islamic countries, and transportation costs are added.
3- The Diya in premeditated and quasi-intentional killing is denser, so an extra third is added on its original amount.
4- A committee of Sharia judges and experts is formed to determine the value of Diya in Jordanian currency in accordance with the above principles, whenever necessary.
B- Aqila
Diya is an obligation on the killer`s Aqila in accidental and quasi-intentional killings, according with the following rulings:
1- A person`s Aqila is his male blood relatives, classified in accordance with their degree of kinship.
2- Diya is shouldered by the killer`s Aqila, each according to his financial capability.
3- Diya is due on those legally competent.
4- The maximum share due on any member of the killer`s Aqila shall not exceed two hundred and fifty JDs., divided over a span of three years.
5- The Sharia judge rules that the whole Diya is due on the killer regardless of the type of killing, and the killer has the right to demand the members of his Aqila to pay the sums due on each in line with these rulings.
6- A killer who has no Aqila shall pay the whole Diya, regardless of the type of killing.
7- If a government or a non-government employee committed murder due to the nature of his work, and without negligence or carelessness on his part, then the public treasury or the organization that he works for shall pay the whole Diya.
8- Dwellers of villages, or neighborhoods who are members of the same clan obliged to pay the Diya of the person who found dead in their area, and whose killer wasn`t known, after the avengers of the blood heir offer compurgation (by oath) in the proper legal form. And Allah Knows Best.

Chairman of the Iftaa` Board, Chief Justice Dr.Nooh Al-Qodaat

Deputized Grand Mufti of Jordan, Sheikh Saeid Hijjawi

Dr. Abdassalam Al-Abbadi

Dr. Ahmad Hilayel

Mahmood Shewayat

Dr. Omar Al-Ashkhar

Dr. Ali Al-Faqheer

Dr. Mohammad Naeim Yaseen

Dr. Ibrahim Khash-shan

Dr. Yaseen Daradkeh

Decision Number [ Previous | Next ]


Summarized Fatawaa

Is it permissible for a husband to stop his wife from visiting her family?

A husband shouldn`t stop his wife from visiting her family, and it is disliked for him to do so because such an act makes them harbor feelings of hatred against him.

My father has debts and asked me to repay them years ago, and I promised him I would do so upon his death — is it permissible for me to go back on my promise given that I am unable to repay them, especially since he refuses to contribute to repayment on the grounds that the debt has become my responsibility by virtue of my promise?

All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master the Messenger of Allah ﷺ.
The established principle is that a father's debt is to be repaid from his own wealth, if he possesses sufficient means. As for the promise made by the son to repay it on his father's behalf, fulfilling such a promise is strongly recommended, and breaking it is considerably disliked. Shaykh al-Islām Imām al-Nawawī, may Allah have mercy upon him, states: "Fulfilling a promise is emphatically recommended, and breaking it is severely disliked. The evidences for this from the Qurʾān and the Sunnah are well known." [Rawḍat al-Ṭālibīn,Vol. 2/P.278] Shaykh al-Islām Imām Zakariyyā al-Anṣārī, may Allah have mercy upon him, further states: "The reason fulfilling a promise is not obligatory and breaking it is not forbidden is that a promise is in the nature of a gift, and a gift does not become binding except upon receipt." [Asnā al-Maṭālib fī Sharḥ Rawḍ al-Ṭālib,Vol. 2/P.487]
Given that the son does not possess the financial means to fulfil his promise to his father, breaking this promise falls beyond his capacity — and Allah does not burden a soul beyond what it can bear. Since the father himself possesses sufficient wealth to settle his own debt, repayment must be made from his own funds. Should he pass away before doing so, the debt is to be settled from his estate. And Allah the Almighty knows best.

Does buying meat equivalent to the weight of a slaughtered animal and distributing it avail for an udhiyah?

Praise be to Allah, and prayers and peace be upon our Master the Messenger of Allah.
 
That does not avail for the sacrifice (uḍḥiyyah), because the sacrifice necessarily requires slaughtering an animal from the category of anʿām (camels, cattle, and sheep/goats) within a specified time.
 
Rather, that is considered a form of charity (ṣadaqah) for which one is rewarded, but not an udhiyah. And Allah Almighty knows best.

Is it permissible for the guardian to give Sadaqa (voluntary charity) from the money of the orphans?

It is impermissible for the guardian to donate from the money of the orphans because he is entrusted with the safekeeping of that money, and is prohibited from donating it.