عربي
Home


Resolutions of Iftaa' Board


Resolutions of Iftaa' Board

Resolution No.(271): "Ruling on Holding Shares in Companies whose Business is a Mixture of Lawful and Unlawful Transactions"

Date Added : 25-02-2020

Resolution No.(271)(2/2019), By The Board of Iftaa', Researches and Islamic Studies:

"Ruling on Holding Shares in Companies whose Business is a Mixture of Lawful and Unlawful Transactions"

Date: (25/ Jumādā al-Awwal/1440 AH), corresponding to (31/1/2019)

All perfect praise be to Allah, the Lord of the Worlds, and may His Peace and Blessings be upon our Prophet Muhammad and upon all of his family and companions.

During its second session held on the above date, the Board reviewed the letter {No.611/55122/1352. Date: 22/11/2018} sent from His Excellency, Chairman of the Sharia Consultative Committee in charge of drawing up the Sharia and accounting standards for the classification of companies according to their compliance with the rules of Sharia. The letter was addressed to the Secretary General of the Iftaa` Dept. Dr. Ahmad Al-Hasanat, and it read as follows: 

I would like to bring to your kind attention the fact that the Amman Stock Exchange has formed a Sharia consultative committee to draw up the Sharia and accounting standards for the classification of companies according to their compliance with the rules of Sharia. This committee includes a number of experts in various fields of Islamic financing from both technical and Sharia perspectives. Having reviewed the resolutions of the Iftaa` Board, Fatwas of the Iftaa` Department, resolutions of the International Islamic Fiqh Academy, AAOIFI Sharia Standard No.(21) about "Stock Exchange: Shares and bonds", resolutions of Sharia supervisory councils, Dow Jones Islamic Market Index, former international experiences, in addition to several research papers and studies in this filed, the committee has drawn up a draft of the above standards, subjected them to arbitration, commented on them, and set up Sharia and accounting regulations for them. 

In light of this, we would like to stress the significance of this project and its impact on strengthening and developing the Islamic economy. This is in addition to assisting investors who have the inclination to invest in companies whose businesses comply with the principles of the tolerant Islamic Sharia, and this, eventually, will lead to strengthening and supporting the national economy. We would like you to discuss the above draft with the Iftaa` Board to deliver the ruling of Sharia on it.

After deliberating the above issue, the Board decided adopting the following Sharia standards:

First: There is no harm in dealing with the shares of companies whose declared transactions and financial statements are free of the agreed upon unlawful practices.

Second: It is prohibited to trade in the shares of companies whose core business is definitely prohibited.

Third: Companies and their boards are prohibited to deal in usury, even if the latter was a small percentage.

Fourth: As for companies with mixed transactions (lawful & unlawful) the source of their business is lawful, but they accidentally dealt in some unlawful contracts or sold unlawful items, although these aren`t their basic activities nor stipulated in their registered articles of association. This mixed type must meet two conditions in order for trading in their shares to become permissible:

1- The borrowed or deposited amounts, involving usury, mustn't exceed 25% of the overall value of the company`s shares.

2- Revenues and expenditures resulting from that incidental unlawful transaction-as defined earlier  mustn't exceed 5% from the company`s overall revenues.

The evidence for these two conditions rests on the flexible rules of Islamic Jurisprudence. For example, "Pardoning the little", "Necessity must only be assessed and answered proportionately", and "A general need takes the ruling of a necessity." This is in addition to the rule, which states that the one who undertakes the prohibited action is the one liable for it while others are free from that liability. This particularly applies to modern companies shared by thousands of individuals. Therefore, it is hard for each shareholder to realize, in detail, the incidental transactions of that company.

It is the duty of every Muslim-despite the conditional permissibility of the above ruling-to get rid of the unlawful percentage of his profits, and to spend it on public interest. This is provided that no benefit is earned from the latter whatsoever. And Allah the Almighty Knows Best.

Chairperson of Iftaa` Board,

Grand Mufti of Jordan,

Dr. Mohammad Al-Khalayleh

Sheikh Abdulkareem AlKhasawneh/ Member

Sheikh Sa`eid Al-Hijjawi/ Member 

Prof. Abdullah Al-Fawaaz/ Member{Have a reservation on the word "Mixed"}.

Dr. Muhammad Khair Al-Issa/ Member

Dr. Majid Al-Darawsheh/ Member

Prof. Adam Noah/ Member{have a reservation on the fourth standard}.

Judge. Khaled Al-Worikat/ Member 

Dr. Ahmad Al-Hasanat/ Member

Dr. Mohammad Al-Zou`bi/ Member

 

Decision Number [ Previous | Next ]


Summarized Fatawaa

What is the ruling of Islamic Law on performing ṭawāf on the upper floors of al-Masjid al-Ḥarām, given that these floors are situated above the level of the Ka‘bah, and that the one performing ṭawāf passes by certain barriers, such as pillars and walls, during the ṭawāf?

All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master, the Messenger of Allah ﷺ.
There are numerous conditions for the validity of ṭawāf (circumambulation around the Ka‘bah), among them: that the one performing ṭawāf be inside the Masjid (al-Masjid al-Ḥarām) — even if the Masjid has been expanded, so long as the expansion does not extend out into al-ḥill (land outside the sanctuary boundaries). It suffices for the ṭawāf to be performed in the airspace of the Masjid or upon its roof, even if that roof is higher than the Ka‘bah (the House) itself.
Al-Khaṭīb ash-Shirbīnī (raḥimahullāh) said: "It [ṭawāf] is valid upon the roof of the Masjid, even if the roof of the Masjid is higher than the House — just as prayer [is valid] upon Mount Abū Qubays despite its elevation above the House. This is the relied-upon (mu‘tamad) position." [Mughnī al-Muḥtāj, Vol.2/P.246]
The validity of the tawaf isn`t affected by the pillars and walls standing between the one performing ṭawāf and the House, since the condition is only that the person performing ṭawāf be within the boundaries of the Masjid and outside the boundaries of the Ka‘bah itself.
Ash-Shirbīnī said: "It [ṭawāf] is valid inside the Masjid, even if it is expanded, and even if a barrier stands between the one circumambulating and the House — such as a water-supply structure (saqāyah) or pillars (sawārī)." [Mughnī al-Muḥtāj, Vol. 2/P.246]
Accordingly, ṭawāf performed on the upper floors is valid, and the presence of barriers such as pillars and walls during the ṭawāf does not affect its validity. And Allah, the Exalted, knows best.

What is the ruling on performing the standing (qiyām) and bowing (rukū‘) portions of the prayer normally, while performing the prostration (sujūd) seated due to knee pain?

All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master, the Messenger of Allah ﷺ.
If performing sujūd (prostration) in prayer causes the worshipper pain in the knees, then it is permissible for him to perform it through gesture (īmā') while seated, since Allah, Glorified and Exalted is He, has lifted hardship from His servants. On the authority of ‘Imrān ibn Ḥuṣayn (raḍiyallāhu ‘anh), he said: "I suffered from hemorrhoids, so I asked the Prophet ﷺ about [how to perform] the prayer, and he said: 'Pray standing; if you are unable, then sitting; and if you are unable, then on your side.'" [Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī]
If the valid excuse later subsides, the worshipper is then obligated to perform the prayer with all its pillars and conditions fully observed — including standing, rukū‘ (bowing), and sujūd (prostration). And Allah, the Exalted, knows best.

Is it permissible for a woman to give the ransom (Fidyah) for breaking her fast to her granddaughter (her son`s daughter)?

Praise be to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our Master, the Messenger of Allah.
 
It is permissible for a woman to give the ransom (Fidya) for breaking her fast in Ramadan to her granddaughter (her son’s daughter), provided that the girl is poor and her basic needs are not being met by the maintenance (Nafaqah) of those who are lislamically obligated to provide for her. And Allah the Exalted knows best.

What is the ruling of Islamic Law on one who died owing debts and left no wealth? Is it obligatory upon the heirs to settle these debts?

 

All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master, the Messenger of Allah.
The general rule is that if a person dies owing rights to other people, such as debts, these are settled from his estate, if he left any wealth, before the estate is divided. The Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) said: “The believer's soul is suspended by his debt until it is settled for him.” Graded ḥasan by al-Tirmidhī. Repayment of debts takes precedence over the heirs’ right to inheritance.
If the deceased left no estate, or left wealth that was insufficient to cover his debts, it is not obligatory for the heirs to pay from their own wealth, but it is recommended for them to do so, because the deceased’s dhimmah (legal liability) remains occupied by the debt. It is reported in some narrations that he remains held in suspension until his debt is paid, and it is not part of filial righteousness for a child to leave his father’s dhimmah burdened with debt.
All of the children may contribute to settling the debt on behalf of their father and cooperate in doing so, even in installments, according to their ability. And Allah Almighty knows best.

See More