عربي
Home


Resolutions of Iftaa' Board


Resolutions of Iftaa' Board

Resolution No.(49) "Ruling on Financing the "Diminishing Partnership" Offered by the Central Bank to its Employees"

Date Added : 16-12-2015

Resolution No.(49): "Ruling on Financing the "Diminishing Partnership" Offered by the Central Bank to its Employees"
Date: 24/4/1422 AH, corresponding to 15/7/2001.

What is the ruling of Islamic Sharia on the diminishing partnership system offered by the Central Bank to its employees?

Answer:

All perfect praise be to Allah, The Lord of The Worlds; and may His blessings and peace be upon our Prophet Mohammad and upon all his family and companions.

Over several sessions, the Board has reviewed the above issue and arrived at the following view:

Employees of Islamic banks and others can obtain dwellings by one of the following formulae:

First: Murabaha in favor of the purchaser where the employee covers the costs of the construction team; whereas, the bank covers the cost of materials which can be bought through the Murabaha transaction so that they become possessed and guaranteed by the bank. This formula can be employed for purchasing a flat or a building in line with the rules of Murabaha.

Second: Istisna` (making on customer`s order). Here, the bank provides the needed financing in line with the conditions of this form of transaction whereby a flat or a building could be built.

However, the formula, in the above question, presented to the Iftaa` Board: "The Diminishing Partnership" and the attached contract differ from a similar contract that had been approved by the Board where the law had defined it as: (The bank participates as a financing partner- partially or completely-in a project of an expected income on basis of agreeing with the other partner that the bank receives a percentage from the net of the actual income while maintaining the right to keep the remaining part of the profit or some of it, to be agreed upon, to cover the original amount of financing it had provided.) 

In other words, the income of the project, which is based on the aforementioned contract, is the one expected upon the conclusion of the contract itself and the determiner of the expected income is the market, after the completion of the project.

First: it isn`t permissible to estimate that revenue in relation to the financing amount provided by the bank, which settles it on basis of the diminished interest, as is the case of the contract presented to the Board. From the perspective of Sharia, that interest is unlawful although it is low.

In order for this formula to become valid, it isn`t correct to calculate the expected revenue in the manner mentioned above; rather, it should be left to the market.

Since the employees desire to have dwellings for residence and since these won`t be offered for leasing, then the Sharia alternative is that a committee of trustworthy and honorable experts estimate the rent of similar premises after the project is finished based on  actual estimation of the prices of similar houses and flats. In conclusion, it is imperative that the contract is rewritten on the basis that draws a distinction between the acceptable and the unacceptable form in Sharia, this is of course if the employee and the bank wish to resort to the above formula "The diminishing partnership", or they can simply resort to other formulae mentioned above. And Allah Knows Best.

 

Chairman of the Iftaa` Board, The Supreme Judge, Sheikh Izuldeen At-Tamimi

Dr. Abdulsalam Al-Abbadi

  Dr. Yousef Ghyzan

Dr. Wasif Al-Bakri

Sheikh Saeid Hijjawi

Dr. Abdulaziz Al-Khayat

Sheikh Na`eim Mujahid

  Dr. Mahmoud Abu Yahia

Sheikh Mahmoud Shewayat

 

Decision Number [ Previous | Next ]


Summarized Fatawaa

How to pay Zakah (obligatory charity) due on articles of merchandise?

Articles of merchandise are estimated by their whole sale market price at the end of each lunar year, and (2.5%) of their value is paid as Zakah whether it (value) went up, or down compared to actual purchasing price, and whether the increase (profit) was in the article itself such as an increase in the animal`s weight, or in the prices themselves. And Allah Knows Best.

What advice do you have for those who spend their nights and days of Ramadan watching TV?

Time is too precious to be wasted on entertainment, let alone in the blessed month of Ramadan, where a Muslim should strive for reward and forgiveness.

Is it permissible to offer an Udhiyah on behalf of the deceased?

In the Name of Allah, and may peace and blessings be upon our Master, the Messenger of Allah.
 
Offering an Udhiyah (sacrificial animal) on behalf of a deceased person is permissible. This is the official position of the Hanbali school (as stated in Kashshaf al-Qina’ by al-Bahuti,Vol.6/P.428) and was also upheld by the prominent Shafi'i scholar Al-’Abbadi (mentioned in Bidayat al-Muhtaj by Ibn Qadi Shuhbah,Vol. 4/P.358). It has likewise been narrated as a valid view among some Maliki and Hanafi scholars.
 
In fact, Imam Abu Dawud dedicated an entire chapter in his Sunan collection entitled, "Chapter on Sacrificing on Behalf of the Deceased." In it, he recorded a narration from Hanash, who said: "I saw 'Ali sacrificing two rams, so I asked him, 'What is this?' He replied, 'The Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) commanded me to offer a sacrifice on his behalf, so I am sacrificing on his behalf.'"
 
Imam Abu Dawud also narrated from Jabir (may Allah be pleased with him) that the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) said: "O Allah, this is from You, for You, and on behalf of Muhammad and his Ummah (community). In the Name of Allah, and Allah is the Greatest," and he then slaughtered the animal.
 
The textual evidence here lies in the fact that our Master, the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him), offered a sacrifice on behalf of his entire community—and it is well-established that his community includes those who have already passed away.
 
Furthermore, there is an abundance of sacred texts demonstrating that the rewards of righteous deeds reach the deceased. For instance, it is permissible to fast on behalf of a deceased person who passed away with missed obligatory fasts, and it is equally permissible to perform Hajj on their behalf, both of which are firmly established in authentic Hadiths. Therefore, if the reward of fasting (which is a purely physical act of worship) and Hajj (which is a joint physical and financial act of worship) can reach the deceased, then the reward of an Udhiyah reaches them with greater reason (by way of A Fortiori argument). This is because it is a purely financial act of worship, falling under the general category of charity (Sadaqah).
 
Additionally, scholars have reached a consensus (Ijma') that the rewards of charity reach the deceased, and since the Udhiyah is inherently an act of charity, it falls under the same ruling. Consequently, based on all the aforementioned evidence, we hold the view that offering a sacrifice on behalf of the deceased is entirely permissible. And Allah the Almighty Knows Best.

What is the ruling on the cessation of blood after (40) days from delivery, but later continued sporadically during two days of Ramadan?

Once postpartum bleeding (Nifas) ceases, and the woman is certain that it won`t reoccur, then she becomes ritually pure and so she is free to make Ghusl (purificatory bath), pray, and fast. If the bleeding reoccurs before fifteen days from its cessation, and before the end of (60) days after delivery, then the ruling on postpartum bleeding is effective, and her fasting and prayer are null and void, thus she must make up the fasting that she missed and not the prayer during those particular days.

See More