Resolutions of Iftaa' Board



Resolutions of Iftaa' Board

Resolution No.(183): "Ruling on Combining an Ijarah and a Conditioned Hibah"

Date Added : 15-11-2015

Resolution No.(183)(16/2012) by the Board of Iftaa`, Research and Islamic Studies:

"Ruling on Combining an Ijarah and a Conditioned  Hibah"

Date: 5/2/1434 AH, corresponding to 19/12/2012 A.D

 

All perfect praise be to Allah, The Lord of The Worlds; and may His blessings and peace be upon our Prophet Mohammad and upon all his family and companions.

On the aforementioned date, the Board reviewed the ruling of Islamic Sharia on combining the lease contract of a property with a binding promise to grant that property to the tenant after the leasing period ends.

After researching and deliberating, the Board decided the following:

Combining the lease of a property with the promise of granting it (property) to the tenant if the latter complies with the conditions set by the landlord is an example of combined contracts that don`t violate  Islamic Sharia. In addition, there is no Sharia text that forbids the combination of such contracts.

This is because Ijarah (Leasing) is a binding contract whose rent and period are defined and agreed upon by the contracting parties. Similarly, Hibah (Donation/Grant) is a donation contract  which is permissible to be conditioned, as stated by some Hanbalite scholars. Combining them involves no risk since the tenant is able to make full use of the property/house and since he had agreed to the amount of the rent in the first place.

The Malikites` Mufti in Makah, Sheikh Mohammad Bin Ali, passed away in 1367 A.H, stated: "As for examples of Ijarah and Hibah-which are similar to the sale transaction in terms of rulings and conditions- it is permissible to combine any of them with the sale transaction. It is also permissible to combine both of them in one contract because they aren`t contradictory." [Tahtheeb Al-Forooq]

Resolution No.(4/12) of the International Islamic Fiqh Academy states that the above form of transaction is permissible. This has also been confirmed by the Accounting and Auditing Organization for Islamic Financial Institutions/standard (9,8/1) as well as the Fatwa committees in the Muslim World.

All the above is permitted under the condition that the contracting parties abide by the rulings concerning rent throughout the lease period. When applying such transactions, Islamic banks are obliged to comply with all the Sharia standards in this regard. And Allah Knows Best.

 

The Grand Mufti of Jordan / His Eminence Sheikh AbdulKareem al-Khasawneh

Prof. Dr. Abdulsalam Al-Abbadi / Member

Dr. Yahia al-Botoosh / Member

Sheikh Sae`id Hijjawi / Member

Dr. Wasif al-Bakhri / Member

Prof. Mohammad al-Qhodat / Member

Dr. Mohammad Al-Khalayleh / Member

Dr. Mohammad Khair Al-Esa / Member

Dr. Mohammad  al-Z`obi / Member

Decision Number [ Previous | Next ]


Summarized Fatawaa

What is the ruling on intramuscular injections? Do they break the fast?

Therapeutic injections administered under the skin or into the muscles do not break the fast, as they do not enter the body cavity (jauf) through an open passage.
However, intravenous (IV) injections that provide nourishment do break the fast because they function like food and drink in effect.

What is the ruling on performing dry ablution (tayammum) instead of the ritual bath due to severe cold?

Whoever is sick such that he cannot use water, or finds the water cold and heating it is not possible, and the person would be harmed by using cold water, it is permissible for him to perform tayammum. He must make up what he prayed with tayammum, because this is a place where there is water. And Allah the Almighty knows best.

What is the ruling on one who slept while firmly seated on the ground, regarding nullification of ablution?

The default ruling regarding sleep is that it nullifies ablution. An exception to this is one who slept while firmly seated on the ground; his ablution is not nullified by sleep if he wakes up while still firmly seated on the ground. And Allah the Almighty knows best.

Is it permissible for a mother to stop her daughter from marrying a respectable, God-fearing young man because he isn't college/university graduate?

It is impermissible to deny a woman her right in getting married except for a lawful reason, and problems can be solved through dialogue. However, she can file a suit in order for the judge to have a say in that regard.