عربي
Home


Resolutions of Iftaa' Board


Resolutions of Iftaa' Board

Resolution No.(120): “Proposed Amendments to the Draft Bill of the Medical Techniques that Aid in Giving Birth“

Date Added : 02-11-2015

 

Resolution No.(120): “Proposed Amendments to the Draft Bill of the Medical Techniques that Aid in Giving Birth“

Date: 7/7/1429 AH, corresponding to 10/7/2008 AD.

 

The Board has reviewed, on the above date, the letter of His Excellency the chairperson of the Legislation Bureau, No. (DT1/KK/32) on 18/9/2007, corresponding to 6th of Ramadan, 1428, as regards presenting the draft bill of the medical techniques, that aid in giving birth, before the Iftaa` Board for clarifying the ruling of Sharia in this regard.

Answer: All success is due to Allah.

After deliberations and thorough researching, the Board made the following remarks:

First: Article (10), which pertains to the formation of the technical committee for medical technology, and stipulates that: "Two of its members should be specialized expert doctors in the field of medical techniques to act as representatives of the Medical association, nominated by its head.”

In this regard, the Board reaffirms its earlier resolution no. (62/2006), 16/10/1427 AH, corresponding to 18/11/2006, which states that the aforementioned doctors are nominated as the Association`s Council because collective opinion is better than individual opinion in such sensitive matters.

Article (10), paragraph (D) reads: “The Minister may terminate the membership of any member in the above committee based on a recommendation by its head, and to ask the party which had nominated him to nominate someone else in his place.“ The Board reaffirms its previous resolution, which demands adding the phrase "with giving the reasons“. In order to maintain objectivity. Accordingly, this paragraph should read as follows: “The Minister may terminate the membership of any member in the above committee based on a recommendation by its head, with giving the reasons, and to ask the party which had nominated him to nominate someone else in his place.“

Second: Article (11), which allows determining the sex of the embryo within certain restraints, where it reads: 

A. Employing medical technology for commercial purposes, or for selecting the sex, or offspring of the embryo shall be banned.

B. Regardless of what`s mentioned in paragraph (A), the Committee may approve of allowing the concerned spouses to choose the sex of their baby once, on basis of inadmissibility to discriminate between the two sexes, in the following situations:

1- They have more than three babies from the same sex, whether males or females

2- Death of the embryo of the selected sex in his mother`s womb, or after delivery.

3- Medical reasons pertaining to genetic diseases related to the baby`s sex.

The Board believes that items 1 and 2 of paragraph (B) should be deleted since, in principle, a Muslim should be content with what Allah has ordained for him, males or females. In addition, this issue involves religious prohibitions such as allowing science to tamper with man, creating misbalance between the two sexes,  becoming subjected to mixing of lineage, and uncovering of private parts. However, there is no harm in keeping item three from paragraph (A), which reads: “for medical reasons pertaining to genetic diseases related to the baby`s sex.“ This is because undergoing such treatment is allowable. Thus, this article should read as follows: “Employing medical technology for commercial purposes, or for selecting the sex, or offspring of the embryo shall be banned, save in case of genetic diseases related to the baby`s sex.

Third: Article (13), the Board reaffirms its previous resolution in adding a new paragraph to the list of the banned matters in this article. Thus, it should read as follows: “Resorting to operations of mingled sperm and embryos as necessary to avoid mixing them with other ones, or getting used in a manner that violates this law, and consequently lead to mixing of parentage in both situations.

Fourth: Article (15), paragraph (B), which states: “Mingled sperm, or embryos should be preserved for no more than ten years ,  through a written request submitted by the husband in case of mingled sperm, and the two spouses in case of embryos.“ The Board reaffirms its earlier resolution, which indicates that the ten-year period is too long, and recommends limiting it until the success of the fertilization process and the delivery of a sound baby as a result. Thus, this paragraph should read as follows: “Mingled sperm, or embryos should be preserved for no more than ten years ,  through a written request submitted by the husband in case of mingled sperm, and the two spouses in case of embryos, until the success of the fertilization process, and the delivery of a sound baby as a result. Unneeded mingled sperms and embryos are left until they die.“

Fifth: Article (16), which states: 

A. In spite of what is stated in articles (4, 5), the Minister-by recommendation from the committee-may allow a non-married person, who is under treatment, or is about to undergo a medical procedure that may affect his ability to give birth, to have his sperms frozen in order to be used later on in a legal marriage, within the framework of medical techniques, and in accordance with the rules and provisions of this law.“

B. The sperms of the above person shall be destroyed in case he failed to pay the determined payment, restored his natural ability to give birth, or died.

The Council reaffirms its previous resolution that recommends deleting this article because it is a condition that the mingled sperm procedure should be conducted during an existent legal marriage. And Allah Knows Best.

 

Iftaa` Council

Head of the Iftaa` Council

              Chief Justice / Dr. Ahmed Muhammad Hilayil

     Sheikh Abd al-Kareem al-Khusaawinah

Dr. Yusuf Ali Ghaythan

Sheikh Saeed Abd al-Hafiz al-Hijawi

                                                                   Dr. Wasif al-Bakri

                                                                   Dr. Yaser al-Shamali

    Dr. Abdulsalam Al-Abbadi

 

 

Decision Number [ Previous | Next ]


Summarized Fatawaa

What is the ruling on the prayer of one who said "Subḥāna Rabbiya al-ʿAẓīm" in prostration (*sujūd*) and forgot to correct it?

 

All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master, the Messenger of Allah.
Saying “Subḥāna Rabbiya al-ʿAẓīm” in bowing (rukūʿ) and “Subḥāna Rabbiya al-Aʿlā” in prostration (sujūd) is one of the hayʾāt (non-essential sunnahs) of the prayer. Whoever omits it, whether deliberately or by forgetfulness, or replaces it with another remembrance (dhikr), his prayer is valid and he does not perform sujūd al-sahw. Shaykh al-Islām Imam al-Nawawī (may Allah have mercy on him) said: “Our school holds that one does not prostrate for omitting the audible or silent recitation, the tasbīḥ, and the rest of the hayʾāt.” [al-Majmūʿ, Vol.4/p.127]
If he performs sujūd al-sahw for something that does not call for it, his prayer is invalidated, because he introduced a prostration of forgetfulness without a cause, and he must repeat the prayer. The exception is one who did so out of forgetfulness or ignorance, whether because he recently entered Islam or because he lives far from scholars; he is excused and his prayer is not invalidated.
It is stated in Mughni al-Muḥtāj (Vol.1/p.417): “It is stated in al-Anwār: If he does something that does not call for sujūd al-sahw, thinking that it does, and then prostrates, his prayer is not invalidated if he is ignorant because he recently entered Islam or because he is far from scholars.”
Since this issue is hidden from the laity, as it is among the subtleties of knowledge, and the laity are excused for ignorance of whatever is of such a nature, and their act of obedience is not invalidated because of it, it may be said that the prayer of one who has not acquired knowledge of the issue is not invalidated. As for after knowing it, the prayer is invalidated.
Whoever realizes while still in the prayer that his prostration was out of place, it is sunnah for him to perform sujūd al-sahw. And Allah Almighty knows best.

What is the ruling on someone who combines two prayers as an early combination (jam‘ taqdīm), and then arrives at his place of residence during the time of the second prayer — is he obligated to repeat it?

All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master, the Messenger of Allah ﷺ.
Whoever combines Ẓuhr and ‘Aṣr while traveling — that is, before he has reached the built-up boundaries of his hometown [upon returning] — his combination (jam‘) of the two prayers remains valid, even if he arrives at his place of residence before the time for the second prayer has actually begun. This is because the combination was already validly completed with its proper conditions fulfilled, and he is not obligated to repeat the second prayer [upon arrival].
A traveler is permitted to make use of the concessions of shortening (qaṣr) and combining (jam‘) prayers once the distance of travel reaches (81 km) or more, provided that his journey is a permissible one, and that he begins shortening and combining only after actually setting out on the journey and passing beyond the built-up limits of the city in which he resides. And Allah, the Exalted, knows best.

What is the ruling on making up missed prayers during prohibited times?

 

Praise be to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our Master, the Messenger of Allah.
 
It is permissible to make up (qada’) missed prayers at any time, even during the periods when prayer is generally prohibited. The prayers that are forbidden and considered invalid during these times are 'absolute voluntary prayers' (nafl mutlaq)—which have no specific cause—and voluntary prayers whose cause follows the prayer itself, such as the Sunnah of entering Ihram or the Sunnah of the Istikharah prayer. Furthermore, no prayer is considered disliked (makruh) during these prohibited times when performed within the Meccan Sanctuary (Makkah al-Mukarramah).
 
It is stated in Bushra al-Karim (Vol.1/P.181), one of the Shafi’i texts: 'It is not forbidden to perform prayers that have a cause that is not delayed (i.e., the cause is preceding), such as making up a missed prayer (fa’itah)—even if it was a voluntary one—and the funeral prayer (janazah); or a cause that is simultaneous, such as the prayer for rain (istisqa’) or the eclipse prayer (kusuf)... and the Sunnah of wudu, the greeting of the mosque (tahiyyat al-masjid), the Sunnah of circumambulation (tawaf), the Sunnah of arrival, and the prostrations of recitation (tilawah) or thankfulness (shukr). These mentioned prayers and their like are not forbidden provided that one does not specifically intend (ta'ammud) to perform them during the disliked time because it is a disliked time. If one does so intentionally, it becomes forbidden, even if it is a mandatory makeup prayer that is due immediately; because in that case, one is acting in defiance of the Sharia. This is in contrast to when one does not specifically seek out that time, even if the prayer happens to fall within it, or if one seeks it for another purpose—such as delaying a funeral prayer to that time so that a larger number of people may pray over the deceased; in such cases, it is permissible and valid... And it is forbidden to perform prayers with no cause at all, like absolute nafl, or those with a delayed cause, such as the Istikharah prayer, the prayer for Ihram, the prayer for a need (hajah), the prayer before leaving the house, or the prayer before execution; because their causes occur after the prayer itself.' And Allah the Exalted knows best."

What is the ruling on offering a sheep as a sacrifice (Udhiyah) if its fat-tail is sound, except that when it was young, the tip of its fat-tail was cut so that it would grow larger? And what is the ruling in case of doubt regarding the amount that was cut?

 
In the Name of Allah, and may peace and blessings be upon our Master, the Messenger of Allah.
 
Cutting a minor, insignificant portion from the tip of an animal's fat-tail (al-alyah) to encourage it to grow larger is not considered a defect, and it does not prevent the animal from being valid for sacrifice (Udhiyah).
 
It is stated in Tuhfat al-Muhtaj (Vol.9/P.352): "There is some scholarly deliberation regarding the common practice of cutting the tip of the fat-tail so that it grows larger. It could potentially be likened to a partial cut of the ear—supported by the jurists' general rule: 'even if it is a small amount.' On the other hand, if it is an exceptionally minor cut, it might have no effect on validity. This is explicitly clarified by the juristic exception to the general rule, which states that cutting a tiny piece from a large limb causes no harm. This latter view is more well-founded.
 
Furthermore, I found that some scholars investigated this matter and concluded: 'It should not affect validity if a custom-sanctioned portion of its fat-tail is removed during its youth to make it grow larger and look better, just as castrating a male animal causes no harm.' However, applying this unconditionally contradicts the established texts of the jurists, as understood from what I have laid out; thus, the restriction I specified is what must be relied upon."
 
Similarly, it is mentioned in Nihayat al-Muhtaj (8/135): "If a small piece is cut from the fat-tail to help it grow larger, the most well-founded view is that the sacrifice remains valid, as was given in a formal legal verdict (Fatwa) by my father [Shihab al-Din al-Ramli], may Allah be pleased with him. This is proven by the jurists' maxim: 'The loss of a tiny piece from a large limb causes no harm.'"
 
In cases where there is doubt as to whether the portion cut was large or small, the animal is still deemed valid for sacrifice. It is noted in Hashiyat al-Shubramallisi ‘ala Nihayat al-Muhtaj (Vol.8/P.135):
 
"This matter requires careful consideration, but the closer and more correct view is that it is valid. This is because soundness is the default state for the animal from which the piece was cut, and it aligns with what usually occurs—namely, that the part removed to help the fat-tail grow larger is naturally very small." And Allah the Almighty Knows Best.

See More