عربي
Home


Resolutions of Iftaa' Board


Resolutions of Iftaa' Board

Resolution No.(120): “Proposed Amendments to the Draft Bill of the Medical Techniques that Aid in Giving Birth“

Date Added : 02-11-2015

 

Resolution No.(120): “Proposed Amendments to the Draft Bill of the Medical Techniques that Aid in Giving Birth“

Date: 7/7/1429 AH, corresponding to 10/7/2008 AD.

 

The Board has reviewed, on the above date, the letter of His Excellency the chairperson of the Legislation Bureau, No. (DT1/KK/32) on 18/9/2007, corresponding to 6th of Ramadan, 1428, as regards presenting the draft bill of the medical techniques, that aid in giving birth, before the Iftaa` Board for clarifying the ruling of Sharia in this regard.

Answer: All success is due to Allah.

After deliberations and thorough researching, the Board made the following remarks:

First: Article (10), which pertains to the formation of the technical committee for medical technology, and stipulates that: "Two of its members should be specialized expert doctors in the field of medical techniques to act as representatives of the Medical association, nominated by its head.”

In this regard, the Board reaffirms its earlier resolution no. (62/2006), 16/10/1427 AH, corresponding to 18/11/2006, which states that the aforementioned doctors are nominated as the Association`s Council because collective opinion is better than individual opinion in such sensitive matters.

Article (10), paragraph (D) reads: “The Minister may terminate the membership of any member in the above committee based on a recommendation by its head, and to ask the party which had nominated him to nominate someone else in his place.“ The Board reaffirms its previous resolution, which demands adding the phrase "with giving the reasons“. In order to maintain objectivity. Accordingly, this paragraph should read as follows: “The Minister may terminate the membership of any member in the above committee based on a recommendation by its head, with giving the reasons, and to ask the party which had nominated him to nominate someone else in his place.“

Second: Article (11), which allows determining the sex of the embryo within certain restraints, where it reads: 

A. Employing medical technology for commercial purposes, or for selecting the sex, or offspring of the embryo shall be banned.

B. Regardless of what`s mentioned in paragraph (A), the Committee may approve of allowing the concerned spouses to choose the sex of their baby once, on basis of inadmissibility to discriminate between the two sexes, in the following situations:

1- They have more than three babies from the same sex, whether males or females

2- Death of the embryo of the selected sex in his mother`s womb, or after delivery.

3- Medical reasons pertaining to genetic diseases related to the baby`s sex.

The Board believes that items 1 and 2 of paragraph (B) should be deleted since, in principle, a Muslim should be content with what Allah has ordained for him, males or females. In addition, this issue involves religious prohibitions such as allowing science to tamper with man, creating misbalance between the two sexes,  becoming subjected to mixing of lineage, and uncovering of private parts. However, there is no harm in keeping item three from paragraph (A), which reads: “for medical reasons pertaining to genetic diseases related to the baby`s sex.“ This is because undergoing such treatment is allowable. Thus, this article should read as follows: “Employing medical technology for commercial purposes, or for selecting the sex, or offspring of the embryo shall be banned, save in case of genetic diseases related to the baby`s sex.

Third: Article (13), the Board reaffirms its previous resolution in adding a new paragraph to the list of the banned matters in this article. Thus, it should read as follows: “Resorting to operations of mingled sperm and embryos as necessary to avoid mixing them with other ones, or getting used in a manner that violates this law, and consequently lead to mixing of parentage in both situations.

Fourth: Article (15), paragraph (B), which states: “Mingled sperm, or embryos should be preserved for no more than ten years ,  through a written request submitted by the husband in case of mingled sperm, and the two spouses in case of embryos.“ The Board reaffirms its earlier resolution, which indicates that the ten-year period is too long, and recommends limiting it until the success of the fertilization process and the delivery of a sound baby as a result. Thus, this paragraph should read as follows: “Mingled sperm, or embryos should be preserved for no more than ten years ,  through a written request submitted by the husband in case of mingled sperm, and the two spouses in case of embryos, until the success of the fertilization process, and the delivery of a sound baby as a result. Unneeded mingled sperms and embryos are left until they die.“

Fifth: Article (16), which states: 

A. In spite of what is stated in articles (4, 5), the Minister-by recommendation from the committee-may allow a non-married person, who is under treatment, or is about to undergo a medical procedure that may affect his ability to give birth, to have his sperms frozen in order to be used later on in a legal marriage, within the framework of medical techniques, and in accordance with the rules and provisions of this law.“

B. The sperms of the above person shall be destroyed in case he failed to pay the determined payment, restored his natural ability to give birth, or died.

The Council reaffirms its previous resolution that recommends deleting this article because it is a condition that the mingled sperm procedure should be conducted during an existent legal marriage. And Allah Knows Best.

 

Iftaa` Council

Head of the Iftaa` Council

              Chief Justice / Dr. Ahmed Muhammad Hilayil

     Sheikh Abd al-Kareem al-Khusaawinah

Dr. Yusuf Ali Ghaythan

Sheikh Saeed Abd al-Hafiz al-Hijawi

                                                                   Dr. Wasif al-Bakri

                                                                   Dr. Yaser al-Shamali

    Dr. Abdulsalam Al-Abbadi

 

 

Decision Number [ Previous | Next ]


Summarized Fatawaa

What is the ruling on praying while wearing shoes?

Praise be to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our Master, the Messenger of Allah.

There is no sin for a Muslim to perform prayer while wearing their sandals or shoes, provided they are free from any impurities (najasa). It was narrated that Anas bin Malik (may Allah be pleased with him) was asked: 'Did the Prophet ﷺ pray in his sandals?' He replied: 'Yes.'" (Related by Al-Bukhari).

It is stated in Fath al-Bari (Vol.1/P.494) by Ibn Hajar (may Allah have mercy on him): "Regarding the phrase 'praying in his sandals,' Ibn Battal said: 'This is understood to apply as long as there is no impurity on them; furthermore, this is considered one of the legal concessions (rukhas)." And Allah the Almighty knows best.

"I told my family at night: 'I will fast tomorrow as qaḍā' (a make-up fast),' but I forgot to make the intention before sleeping. Is my fast valid?"

All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master, the Messenger of Allah ﷺ.
 
The intention is obligatory in acts of worship. For obligatory fasting, the required intention is to resolve to fast during the night [before dawn]. Its proper locus is the heart, while verbalizing the intention out loud in acts of worship is a sunnah — so that the tongue may align with the heart. If the intent behind the statement in question was the intention to fast, then it is valid; but if the intent was merely to inform someone, or reflected hesitation or doubt, then it is not valid.
 
It is stated in *Bushrā al-Karīm* (Vol.1/P.216): "It is a sunnah to verbalize the intention — that is, whatever has already been intended in the heart, whether an obligatory or a voluntary act — such as specifying the number of rak‘ahs, just before the opening takbīr — so that the tongue may assist the heart, and because this is further removed from whispered doubts (waswasah), and in order to accommodate the view of those who held it obligatory in every act of worship that requires an intention (even though this is a minority position), by analogy with Ḥajj."
 
Accordingly: if the intention to fast arose in your heart before the second adhān [i.e., before Fajr], then your fast is valid.
 
And Allah, the Exalted, knows best.

What is the ruling on someone who fainted while fasting?

● If a person had the intention to fast from the night but then fainted during the day and regained consciousness before sunset, even for a moment, their fast remains valid.
● However, if they remain unconscious for the entire day, from Fajr until sunset, their fast does not count, and they must make up for that day later.

What is the ruling on offering a sheep as a sacrifice (Udhiyah) if its fat-tail is sound, except that when it was young, the tip of its fat-tail was cut so that it would grow larger? And what is the ruling in case of doubt regarding the amount that was cut?

 
In the Name of Allah, and may peace and blessings be upon our Master, the Messenger of Allah.
 
Cutting a minor, insignificant portion from the tip of an animal's fat-tail (al-alyah) to encourage it to grow larger is not considered a defect, and it does not prevent the animal from being valid for sacrifice (Udhiyah).
 
It is stated in Tuhfat al-Muhtaj (Vol.9/P.352): "There is some scholarly deliberation regarding the common practice of cutting the tip of the fat-tail so that it grows larger. It could potentially be likened to a partial cut of the ear—supported by the jurists' general rule: 'even if it is a small amount.' On the other hand, if it is an exceptionally minor cut, it might have no effect on validity. This is explicitly clarified by the juristic exception to the general rule, which states that cutting a tiny piece from a large limb causes no harm. This latter view is more well-founded.
 
Furthermore, I found that some scholars investigated this matter and concluded: 'It should not affect validity if a custom-sanctioned portion of its fat-tail is removed during its youth to make it grow larger and look better, just as castrating a male animal causes no harm.' However, applying this unconditionally contradicts the established texts of the jurists, as understood from what I have laid out; thus, the restriction I specified is what must be relied upon."
 
Similarly, it is mentioned in Nihayat al-Muhtaj (8/135): "If a small piece is cut from the fat-tail to help it grow larger, the most well-founded view is that the sacrifice remains valid, as was given in a formal legal verdict (Fatwa) by my father [Shihab al-Din al-Ramli], may Allah be pleased with him. This is proven by the jurists' maxim: 'The loss of a tiny piece from a large limb causes no harm.'"
 
In cases where there is doubt as to whether the portion cut was large or small, the animal is still deemed valid for sacrifice. It is noted in Hashiyat al-Shubramallisi ‘ala Nihayat al-Muhtaj (Vol.8/P.135):
 
"This matter requires careful consideration, but the closer and more correct view is that it is valid. This is because soundness is the default state for the animal from which the piece was cut, and it aligns with what usually occurs—namely, that the part removed to help the fat-tail grow larger is naturally very small." And Allah the Almighty Knows Best.

See More