عربي
Home


Resolutions of Iftaa' Board


Resolutions of Iftaa' Board

Resolution No.(132): “Articles (15) and (16) of CEDAW Convention"

Date Added : 27-10-2015

 

Resolution No.(132),(10/2009) by the Board of Iftaa`, Research and Islamic Studies:

“Articles (15) and (16) of CEDAW Convention"

Date: 1/8/1430 AH, corresponding to 23/7/2009 AD.

 

 

 

All perfect praise be to Allah, The Lord of The Worlds; and may His blessings and peace be upon our Prophet Mohammad and upon all his family and companions.

During its session held on the above given date, the Board reviewed articles (15) and (16) from the “CEDAW CONVENTION” which calls for absolute equality between men and women.

The Board has dwelled on the following verse: “And in no wise covet those things in which God Hath bestowed His gifts More freely on some of you than on others: To men is allotted what they earn, and to women what they earn: But ask God of His bounty. For God hath full knowledge of all things.” {An-Nisa`/32}. The Board would like to clarify that the legal is what Allah has made legal and the illegal is what Allah has made illegal. Allah has created both the male and the female, and He is aware of His creation. His law has equalized between men and women in aspects where they are equal such as belief, the right to education, ownership, choosing a spouse, and the like, within the boundaries of Sharia.

He has favored woman over  man in aspects where she had surpassed him, such as the right to child custody in case of separation, because her Fitrah (natural disposition) enables her to raise children. He has also favored her with the right to receive kind treatment from her children.

On the other hand, He has favored man over woman in aspects where he had surpassed her, such as the ability to make a living; therefore, man is obliged to provide for his family. Allah Has also Favored him with the ability to fight, and this is why he is obliged to bear arms to defend his homeland when necessary.

Therefore, whatever violates the rules of Sharia from the “CEDAW CONVENTION” is forbidden and impermissible to put into effect, such as a wife`s freedom in movement and residence, because this undermines the intention behind the concept of the family which Sharia came to protect. Also,  a Muslim woman marrying a non-Muslim man constitutes another violation to the rules of Sharia.

The Board stresses its appreciation to the Supreme Judge`s Department`s stand in rejecting whatever violates the provisions of Sharia from the CEDAW CONVENTION as well as its concern about the family and its related affairs.

The Board hopes that the Jordanian Parliament rejects such legislations which represent a clear violation to Islamic Sharia.

Moreover, it is imperative that every Muslim rejects matters that contradict Allah`s Law. Allah, The Almighty, Says (what means): “the command is for none but God: He hath commanded that ye worship none but Him: that is the right religion, but most men understand not...” {Yousef/40}. And Allah The Almighty Knows Best.

 

 

 

Chairman of the Iftaa` Board, Grand Mufti of Jordan,Dr. Nooh al-Qhodat

Vice Chairman of the Iftaa` Board, 

Dr. Ahmad Hilayel

Sheikh Abdulkareem al-Khasawneh/ Member

Sheikh Sa`eid Hijjawi/ Member

Dr. Mohammad Khair al-Eesa/ Member

Judge Sari al-Ass`ad/ Member

Dr. Abdurahamn Ibbdah/ Member

Dr. Mohammad Okla/ Member

Dr. Abdunnasir Abulbasal/ Member

Executive Secretary of the Board/ Dr. Mohammad Al-Khalayleh

 

Decision Number [ Previous | Next ]


Summarized Fatawaa

I have a brother who is harsh in his dealings [with me], and many problems have occurred between us, and I do not intend to reconcile with him. What is the ruling of Islamic Law on that?

All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master, the Messenger of Allah.
It is not permissible for a Muslim to abandon or boycott his fellow Muslim brother for more than three days. This is based on the saying of the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him: "It is not lawful for a Muslim to forsake his brother for more than three [days], meeting each other but one turns away and the other turns away, and the better of the two is the one who initiates the greeting (salam)." (Reported by al-Bukhari.)
A Muslim must strive to end such estrangement (hajr), so as not to fall under the prohibition mentioned in the hadith. If he takes the initiative to reconcile but the other party does not respond, then there is no sin upon him. We remind [ourselves] of the saying of Allah, the Exalted: "And let them pardon and overlook. Do you not wish that Allah should forgive you? And Allah is Forgiving and Merciful." (An-Nur/22). And Allah, the Exalted, knows best.

Does using a gargling medicine break the fast?

If the medicine reaches the body cavity (jauf), the fast is invalidated. However, if it does not enter the body cavity, the fast remains valid.
Therefore, it is advisable to avoid using it during the day in Ramadan.

Is it permissible for one who sacrifices on behalf of another, with the latter's permission, to eat from the sacrifice?

It is permissible for someone who sacrificed on behalf of another with their permission to eat from it with their permission, and they stand in their place (act as their representative) in distributing it.
 
It is stated in Nihayat al-Muhtaj ila Sharh al-Minhaj (Vol.8/P.141): "And he—meaning the one sacrificing on his own behalf, provided he has not apostatized—has the right to eat from a voluntary sacrifice and his sacrificial gift; rather, it is recommended. As for an obligatory sacrifice, it is forbidden for him to eat from it, whether it was designated as such initially or as a liability in his dhimmah. And excluded by what has preceded is if he sacrifices on behalf of another, or if he apostatized, then it is not permissible for him to eat from it, just as it is absolutely impermissible to feed a disbeliever from it."(The text I found indicates the impermissibility of eating) ???
 
And it is stated in Hashiyat al-Jamal ‘ala Sharh al-Manhaj (Vol.5/P.262): "If a person offers a sacrifice on behalf of a living person with their permission, does he act as their representative in distributing it—on the grounds that permission to sacrifice is permission to distribute it—or does it depend on their explicit permission? This requires consideration, but the first view is not far-fetched." And Allah the Almighty knows best.

What is the ruling on forgetting an integral of the prayer?

Praise be to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our Master, the Messenger of Allah.
 
Whoever forgets an integral (Rukn) of the prayer and remembers it before reaching the equivalent point in the subsequent unit (Rak'ah), must return to it (i.e., perform it) and complete his prayer, then perform the prostration of forgetfulness (Sujud al-Sahw) at the end of his prayer. However, if he remembers it after reaching the equivalent point in the subsequent unit, the Rak'ah in which the integral was forgotten is invalidated, and the current unit takes its place; he then completes a full Rak'ah to compensate and performs the prostration of forgetfulness.
 
It is stated in Nihayat al-Muhtaj ila Sharh al-Minhaj (Vol.1/P.543): 'If he becomes certain at the end of his prayer, or after the Salam—provided the interval is not long according to custom and he has not stepped on an impurity—that he omitted a prostration from the final Rak'ah, he must perform it and repeat the Tashahhud, as his previous Tashahhud occurred before its proper place. If the omission was from a Rak'ah other than the final one, he must perform a full Rak'ah, because the deficient unit was completed by a prostration from the subsequent one, rendering the rest of that subsequent unit void.' And Allah the Exalted knows best.

See More