عربي
Home


Resolutions of Iftaa' Board


Resolutions of Iftaa' Board

Resolution No.(49) "Ruling on Financing the "Diminishing Partnership" Offered by the Central Bank to its Employees"

Date Added : 16-12-2015

Resolution No.(49): "Ruling on Financing the "Diminishing Partnership" Offered by the Central Bank to its Employees"
Date: 24/4/1422 AH, corresponding to 15/7/2001.

What is the ruling of Islamic Sharia on the diminishing partnership system offered by the Central Bank to its employees?

Answer:

All perfect praise be to Allah, The Lord of The Worlds; and may His blessings and peace be upon our Prophet Mohammad and upon all his family and companions.

Over several sessions, the Board has reviewed the above issue and arrived at the following view:

Employees of Islamic banks and others can obtain dwellings by one of the following formulae:

First: Murabaha in favor of the purchaser where the employee covers the costs of the construction team; whereas, the bank covers the cost of materials which can be bought through the Murabaha transaction so that they become possessed and guaranteed by the bank. This formula can be employed for purchasing a flat or a building in line with the rules of Murabaha.

Second: Istisna` (making on customer`s order). Here, the bank provides the needed financing in line with the conditions of this form of transaction whereby a flat or a building could be built.

However, the formula, in the above question, presented to the Iftaa` Board: "The Diminishing Partnership" and the attached contract differ from a similar contract that had been approved by the Board where the law had defined it as: (The bank participates as a financing partner- partially or completely-in a project of an expected income on basis of agreeing with the other partner that the bank receives a percentage from the net of the actual income while maintaining the right to keep the remaining part of the profit or some of it, to be agreed upon, to cover the original amount of financing it had provided.) 

In other words, the income of the project, which is based on the aforementioned contract, is the one expected upon the conclusion of the contract itself and the determiner of the expected income is the market, after the completion of the project.

First: it isn`t permissible to estimate that revenue in relation to the financing amount provided by the bank, which settles it on basis of the diminished interest, as is the case of the contract presented to the Board. From the perspective of Sharia, that interest is unlawful although it is low.

In order for this formula to become valid, it isn`t correct to calculate the expected revenue in the manner mentioned above; rather, it should be left to the market.

Since the employees desire to have dwellings for residence and since these won`t be offered for leasing, then the Sharia alternative is that a committee of trustworthy and honorable experts estimate the rent of similar premises after the project is finished based on  actual estimation of the prices of similar houses and flats. In conclusion, it is imperative that the contract is rewritten on the basis that draws a distinction between the acceptable and the unacceptable form in Sharia, this is of course if the employee and the bank wish to resort to the above formula "The diminishing partnership", or they can simply resort to other formulae mentioned above. And Allah Knows Best.

 

Chairman of the Iftaa` Board, The Supreme Judge, Sheikh Izuldeen At-Tamimi

Dr. Abdulsalam Al-Abbadi

  Dr. Yousef Ghyzan

Dr. Wasif Al-Bakri

Sheikh Saeid Hijjawi

Dr. Abdulaziz Al-Khayat

Sheikh Na`eim Mujahid

  Dr. Mahmoud Abu Yahia

Sheikh Mahmoud Shewayat

 

Decision Number [ Previous | Next ]


Summarized Fatawaa

Is the Saying "Whatever is Taken by the Sword of Shyness is Forbidden" an Authentic Ḥadīth?

All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master the Messenger of Allah ﷺ.
The saying "Whatever is taken by the sword of shyness is forbidden" is not an authentic ḥadīth, though its underlying meaning is sound. The established sharʿī principle is that a Muslim's wealth is not lawful for anyone to take except with his wholehearted consent, as Allah the Almighty says {what means}: "O you who have believed, do not consume one another's wealth unjustly, but only [in lawful] business by mutual consent." [Al-Nisā/ 29] And the Messenger of Allah ﷺ said: "Listen to me and you will live well: do not wrong others, do not wrong others, do not wrong others. Indeed, a man's wealth is not lawful except with his full, willing consent." (Reported by Aḥmad in his Musnad.) Whatever is taken through the pressure of shyness or social embarrassment runs directly counter to genuine, wholehearted consent.
The jurists have explicitly stated that whatever is taken by means of the "sword of shyness" carries the same ruling as that which is taken by coercion — it must be returned to its rightful owner.
Ibn Ḥajar al-Haytamī, may Allah have mercy upon him, states in al-Fatāwā al-Kubrā (Vol.3/P.30): "Do you not see the reported scholarly consensus that whoever has something taken from him purely out of shyness, without his genuine consent, does not pass ownership of it to the one who took it? They reasoned that this constitutes a form of coercion through the 'sword of shyness,' comparable to coercion at the point of an actual sword. Indeed, many people would rather submit to the literal sword and endure the pain of its wound than submit to this first kind of coercion, out of fear for their dignity and standing — which people of sound judgment hold dear and guard most fiercely." And Allah the Almighty knows best.

Is it permissible to trim the eyebrows if they become excessively long?

Trimming eyebrows is permissible if they become excessively long, yet; it is reprehensible. And Allah Knows Best.

What is the ruling of Islamic Law on compensating the patient in case of medical error on the part of the treating physician?

 
All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master, the Messenger of Allah.
 
The foundational principle is that every mistake issued by a physician that causes harm to another due to his negligence or lack of expertise obligates him to guarantee liability and compensate the harmed party. The Sharia maxim, in this regard, states: "The direct actor is liable."
 
Ibn Qudamah (may Allah have mercy on him) says: "As for if he was skilled but his hand committed an error—such as exceeding the proper limit of incision, cutting in an incorrect site, cutting with an instrument that inflicts excessive pain, or cutting at an unsuitable time—he is liable, because it is destruction (Itlaf) whose liability does not differ between intent and mistake, thus resembling the destruction of property; and because it is a prohibited act, so he guarantees liability for its secondary effects." [Al-Mughni].
 
However, if the physician performed what was necessary in the most complete manner and took all measures of care and caution, but complications occurred that could not be avoided according to specialists, then no liability rests upon him.
 
Shaykh al-Islam Imam al-Nawawi (may Allah have mercy on him) says: "The cupper and the circumciser bear no liability if they have not been negligent, and likewise the veterinarian if he bleeds an animal and it perishes." [Rawdat al-Talibin].
 
Al-Khattabi (may Allah have mercy on him) said: "I know of no disagreement that if the practitioner transgresses and the patient perishes, he is liable. Anyone who undertakes knowledge or practice he does not know is a transgressor; so if perishing arises from his action, he is liable for the blood-money (Diyah) while capital retaliation (Qisas) is dropped from him, because he did not act independently without the patient's permission. And the physician’s offense in the view of the generality of jurists is borne by his agnates ('Aqilah*)."* [Ma'alim al-Sunan].
 
If negligence or transgression is established against the physician, it is necessary to compensate the patient or seek forgiveness from him. And Allah Almighty knows best.

Does passing wind from the anus affect ritual purity?

Ablution is nullified by the passing of wind from the anus, but washing the anus is not required as wind leaves no impurity.

See More