عربي
Home


Resolutions of Iftaa' Board


Resolutions of Iftaa' Board

Resolution No.(52)" :A Proposed Amendment to the Rights of the Child Law"

Date Added : 07-01-2016

Resolution No.(52): "A Proposed Amendment to the Rights of the Child Law"
Date: 29/7/1422 AH, corresponding to 16/10/2001

We have received the following question:

What is the ruling of Islamic Sharia on the sections of the rights of the child draft law?

Having reviewed the above draft law, the Board arrived at the following:

Article (4), paragraph (B): "A child who is deprived from family welfare has the right to nursery or foster care in line with the rules of Islamic Sharia, and he should be provided with a dwelling at a child care organization or a foster family in the Kingdom."

The Board is of the view that this article should be rephrased as follows:

"A child who is deprived from family welfare has the right to nursery or foster care, and he/she should be provided with a dwelling at a child care organization or a foster family in the Kingdom in line with the rules of Islamic Sharia."

Article (7), paragraph (B): "All official as well as non-official organizations concerned with providing child services should give priority to children at times of conflict and catastrophe."

The Board is of the view that this paragraph should be amended and rephrased because the meaning of (give priority) isn`t clear.

Article (9): "Despite the sections, of any other law, which specify the age of marriage at eighteen and give an exception to those who have completed sixteen years of age to conclude their marriage contract after obtaining a permission from the Supreme Judge."

The Board views that the above article should be deleted because the Jordanian Personal Status Law (1) has specified the age of marriage.

Article (16): "In case a report was submitted by the committee recommending separating the child from his family when it is proven that he had been subjected to any act of abuse referred to in paragraph (A) or it was proven that he is in need for special care that can`t be provided by his family."

The Board views that the preposition (on) should be changed into (to).

Article (17): "The court of competent jurisdiction may not issue a verdict to separate a child from his family save after the following:

A) Confirming the abuse stated in article (16).

B) Submitting a report from the committee recommending that the separation is necessary.

C) Providing the child with a foster family or a proper place where he can enjoy peace and security.

The Board views that this article should be deleted because the court`s verdict doesn`t rest on the report submitted by the committee recommending the separation, and many cases are usually referred to the judge directly without any reports.

Article (19), paragraph (B): "Foster care is undertaken by a foster family or a social welfare organization in accordance with a regulation issued to this purpose."

The Board views that the phrase (in line with the rules of Islamic Sharia) should be added at the end of this paragraph.

Article (21): The Board views that the word (The disabled) should be deleted from this article and wherever it is stated, and should be replaced with (People with special needs). And Allah Knows Best.

Chairman of the Iftaa` Board, The Supreme Judge, Izzuldeen At-Tamimi
          Dr. Abdulsalam Al-abbadi
  Dr. Yousef Ghyzaan
Dr. Wasif Al-Bakhri
        Sheikh Sa`eid Al-Hijjawi
               Sheikh Mahmood Shewayat
         Dr. Mahmood Abu Yahia
Sheikh Na`eim Mujahid

Note (1): Article (5) of the Jordanian Personal Status Law was amended in 2001 to read as follows: "Marriage eligibility stipulates that the suitor and his fiance are discerning and have completed eighteen years of age; however, it is permissible for the Sharia judge to permit their marriage if any of them hasn`t reached that age in case he/she has completed fifteen years, and there is a benefit behind such marriage, as determined by the regulations which the Supreme Judge issues to this purpose."

 

Decision Number [ Previous | Next ]


Summarized Fatawaa

A woman became pure [from menstruation] before Fajr, but did not perform ghusl until after sunrise — what is the ruling on her fast?

All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master, the Messenger of Allah ﷺ.
Her fast is valid, since ghusl (ritual bathing) is not a condition for the validity of the fast, but rather for the validity of the prayer. However, she is sinful for delaying the Fajr prayer beyond its designated time without a valid excuse.
It is known that the time for Fajr prayer ends at sunrise. Nevertheless, she must still perform ghusl, and make up the Fajr prayer. And Allah, the Exalted, knows best.

What is the ruling on using eye drops while fasting?

Eye drops do not break the fast, even if the taste reaches the throat, because the eye is not an open passage to the body cavity.

What is the ruling on one who wiped over his leather socks (*khuff*) while resident and then traveled, or wiped while traveling and then became resident? And likewise, what is the ruling on one who incurred a minor ritual impurity (*ḥadath aṣghar*) while resident, then traveled and wiped while traveling?

 

All praise is due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon our master, the Messenger of Allah.
Whoever wipes over his leather socks (khuffayn) while resident and then travels, or wipes while traveling and then becomes resident, before a day and a night have passed in both cases, completes the wiping period of a resident. If he wipes while resident and then travels after a day and a night have passed, he must remove the socks, because the period has ended. Likewise, if he wipes while traveling and then becomes resident after a day and a night have passed, he must remove them as well.
Whoever breaks his wuḍūʾ while resident and then wipes while traveling takes the ruling of a traveler as regards the duration of wiping, so long as he does not become resident. It is stated in ʿUmdat al-Sālik wa ʿUddat al-Nāsik (Vol.1/p.15): “If he wipes over both [socks] or one of them while resident and then travels, or wipes while traveling and then becomes resident, or doubts whether he began the wiping while traveling or while resident, he completes only the wiping period of a resident. But if he broke his wuḍūʾ while resident and wiped while traveling, he completes the period of a traveler, whether or not the full time of a prayer had passed over him while resident.” And Allah Almighty knows best.

What is the ruling on ablution if vaginal discharge is expelled, and is it impure?

If these discharges exit from the external genitalia (apparent part of the vagina), they are not impure and do not invalidate ablution. If they exit from the internal part, they are impure and do invalidate ablution. If it is uncertain whether they are from the internal or external part, they are not impure and do not invalidate ablution.
 
The apparent part is what becomes visible when sitting, and what the husband's penis reaches during intercourse is considered part of the apparent. The internal part is what is beyond that. And Allah the Almighty knows best.

See More