عربي
Home


Resolutions of Iftaa' Board


Resolutions of Iftaa' Board

Resolution No.(52)" :A Proposed Amendment to the Rights of the Child Law"

Date Added : 07-01-2016

Resolution No.(52): "A Proposed Amendment to the Rights of the Child Law"
Date: 29/7/1422 AH, corresponding to 16/10/2001

We have received the following question:

What is the ruling of Islamic Sharia on the sections of the rights of the child draft law?

Having reviewed the above draft law, the Board arrived at the following:

Article (4), paragraph (B): "A child who is deprived from family welfare has the right to nursery or foster care in line with the rules of Islamic Sharia, and he should be provided with a dwelling at a child care organization or a foster family in the Kingdom."

The Board is of the view that this article should be rephrased as follows:

"A child who is deprived from family welfare has the right to nursery or foster care, and he/she should be provided with a dwelling at a child care organization or a foster family in the Kingdom in line with the rules of Islamic Sharia."

Article (7), paragraph (B): "All official as well as non-official organizations concerned with providing child services should give priority to children at times of conflict and catastrophe."

The Board is of the view that this paragraph should be amended and rephrased because the meaning of (give priority) isn`t clear.

Article (9): "Despite the sections, of any other law, which specify the age of marriage at eighteen and give an exception to those who have completed sixteen years of age to conclude their marriage contract after obtaining a permission from the Supreme Judge."

The Board views that the above article should be deleted because the Jordanian Personal Status Law (1) has specified the age of marriage.

Article (16): "In case a report was submitted by the committee recommending separating the child from his family when it is proven that he had been subjected to any act of abuse referred to in paragraph (A) or it was proven that he is in need for special care that can`t be provided by his family."

The Board views that the preposition (on) should be changed into (to).

Article (17): "The court of competent jurisdiction may not issue a verdict to separate a child from his family save after the following:

A) Confirming the abuse stated in article (16).

B) Submitting a report from the committee recommending that the separation is necessary.

C) Providing the child with a foster family or a proper place where he can enjoy peace and security.

The Board views that this article should be deleted because the court`s verdict doesn`t rest on the report submitted by the committee recommending the separation, and many cases are usually referred to the judge directly without any reports.

Article (19), paragraph (B): "Foster care is undertaken by a foster family or a social welfare organization in accordance with a regulation issued to this purpose."

The Board views that the phrase (in line with the rules of Islamic Sharia) should be added at the end of this paragraph.

Article (21): The Board views that the word (The disabled) should be deleted from this article and wherever it is stated, and should be replaced with (People with special needs). And Allah Knows Best.

Chairman of the Iftaa` Board, The Supreme Judge, Izzuldeen At-Tamimi
          Dr. Abdulsalam Al-abbadi
  Dr. Yousef Ghyzaan
Dr. Wasif Al-Bakhri
        Sheikh Sa`eid Al-Hijjawi
               Sheikh Mahmood Shewayat
         Dr. Mahmood Abu Yahia
Sheikh Na`eim Mujahid

Note (1): Article (5) of the Jordanian Personal Status Law was amended in 2001 to read as follows: "Marriage eligibility stipulates that the suitor and his fiance are discerning and have completed eighteen years of age; however, it is permissible for the Sharia judge to permit their marriage if any of them hasn`t reached that age in case he/she has completed fifteen years, and there is a benefit behind such marriage, as determined by the regulations which the Supreme Judge issues to this purpose."

 

Decision Number [ Previous | Next ]


Summarized Fatawaa

What is the ruling on offering a sheep as a sacrifice (Udhiyah) if its fat-tail is sound, except that when it was young, the tip of its fat-tail was cut so that it would grow larger? And what is the ruling in case of doubt regarding the amount that was cut?

 
In the Name of Allah, and may peace and blessings be upon our Master, the Messenger of Allah.
 
Cutting a minor, insignificant portion from the tip of an animal's fat-tail (al-alyah) to encourage it to grow larger is not considered a defect, and it does not prevent the animal from being valid for sacrifice (Udhiyah).
 
It is stated in Tuhfat al-Muhtaj (Vol.9/P.352): "There is some scholarly deliberation regarding the common practice of cutting the tip of the fat-tail so that it grows larger. It could potentially be likened to a partial cut of the ear—supported by the jurists' general rule: 'even if it is a small amount.' On the other hand, if it is an exceptionally minor cut, it might have no effect on validity. This is explicitly clarified by the juristic exception to the general rule, which states that cutting a tiny piece from a large limb causes no harm. This latter view is more well-founded.
 
Furthermore, I found that some scholars investigated this matter and concluded: 'It should not affect validity if a custom-sanctioned portion of its fat-tail is removed during its youth to make it grow larger and look better, just as castrating a male animal causes no harm.' However, applying this unconditionally contradicts the established texts of the jurists, as understood from what I have laid out; thus, the restriction I specified is what must be relied upon."
 
Similarly, it is mentioned in Nihayat al-Muhtaj (8/135): "If a small piece is cut from the fat-tail to help it grow larger, the most well-founded view is that the sacrifice remains valid, as was given in a formal legal verdict (Fatwa) by my father [Shihab al-Din al-Ramli], may Allah be pleased with him. This is proven by the jurists' maxim: 'The loss of a tiny piece from a large limb causes no harm.'"
 
In cases where there is doubt as to whether the portion cut was large or small, the animal is still deemed valid for sacrifice. It is noted in Hashiyat al-Shubramallisi ‘ala Nihayat al-Muhtaj (Vol.8/P.135):
 
"This matter requires careful consideration, but the closer and more correct view is that it is valid. This is because soundness is the default state for the animal from which the piece was cut, and it aligns with what usually occurs—namely, that the part removed to help the fat-tail grow larger is naturally very small." And Allah the Almighty Knows Best.

What is the expiation for perjury?

One who commits perjury should repent, seek Allah`s forgiveness and offer an expiation which is: feeding ten indigent persons, or clothing them, or giving a slave his freedom, but if that is beyond his means then, he should fast for three days. Allah, The Almighty, Says in this regard (What means): "Allah will not call you to account for what is futile in your oaths, but He will call you to account for your deliberate oaths: for expiation, feed ten indigent persons, on a scale of the average for the food of your families; or clothe them; or give a slave his freedom. If that is beyond your means, fast for three days. That is the expiation for the oaths ye have sworn. But keep to your oaths. Thus doth Allah make clear to you His signs, that ye may be grateful." [Al-Ma`idah/89].

What is the ruling on swallowing phlegm while fasting?

If a fasting person intentionally swallows phlegm, their fast is invalid, as it is possible to avoid it.
However, if they swallow it unintentionally, their fast remains valid.
Phlegm is impure and should be avoided.

Is it permissible to pay the Fitr Zakah (obligatory charity) of Ramadan on behalf of a dead person?

The Fitr Zakah of Ramadhaan isn`t due on one who had passed away before the sunset of the last day of Ramadan. And Allah Knows Best.

See More