عربي
Home


Resolutions of Iftaa' Board


Resolutions of Iftaa' Board

Resolution No.(132): “Articles (15) and (16) of CEDAW Convention"

Date Added : 27-10-2015

 

Resolution No.(132),(10/2009) by the Board of Iftaa`, Research and Islamic Studies:

“Articles (15) and (16) of CEDAW Convention"

Date: 1/8/1430 AH, corresponding to 23/7/2009 AD.

 

 

 

All perfect praise be to Allah, The Lord of The Worlds; and may His blessings and peace be upon our Prophet Mohammad and upon all his family and companions.

During its session held on the above given date, the Board reviewed articles (15) and (16) from the “CEDAW CONVENTION” which calls for absolute equality between men and women.

The Board has dwelled on the following verse: “And in no wise covet those things in which God Hath bestowed His gifts More freely on some of you than on others: To men is allotted what they earn, and to women what they earn: But ask God of His bounty. For God hath full knowledge of all things.” {An-Nisa`/32}. The Board would like to clarify that the legal is what Allah has made legal and the illegal is what Allah has made illegal. Allah has created both the male and the female, and He is aware of His creation. His law has equalized between men and women in aspects where they are equal such as belief, the right to education, ownership, choosing a spouse, and the like, within the boundaries of Sharia.

He has favored woman over  man in aspects where she had surpassed him, such as the right to child custody in case of separation, because her Fitrah (natural disposition) enables her to raise children. He has also favored her with the right to receive kind treatment from her children.

On the other hand, He has favored man over woman in aspects where he had surpassed her, such as the ability to make a living; therefore, man is obliged to provide for his family. Allah Has also Favored him with the ability to fight, and this is why he is obliged to bear arms to defend his homeland when necessary.

Therefore, whatever violates the rules of Sharia from the “CEDAW CONVENTION” is forbidden and impermissible to put into effect, such as a wife`s freedom in movement and residence, because this undermines the intention behind the concept of the family which Sharia came to protect. Also,  a Muslim woman marrying a non-Muslim man constitutes another violation to the rules of Sharia.

The Board stresses its appreciation to the Supreme Judge`s Department`s stand in rejecting whatever violates the provisions of Sharia from the CEDAW CONVENTION as well as its concern about the family and its related affairs.

The Board hopes that the Jordanian Parliament rejects such legislations which represent a clear violation to Islamic Sharia.

Moreover, it is imperative that every Muslim rejects matters that contradict Allah`s Law. Allah, The Almighty, Says (what means): “the command is for none but God: He hath commanded that ye worship none but Him: that is the right religion, but most men understand not...” {Yousef/40}. And Allah The Almighty Knows Best.

 

 

 

Chairman of the Iftaa` Board, Grand Mufti of Jordan,Dr. Nooh al-Qhodat

Vice Chairman of the Iftaa` Board, 

Dr. Ahmad Hilayel

Sheikh Abdulkareem al-Khasawneh/ Member

Sheikh Sa`eid Hijjawi/ Member

Dr. Mohammad Khair al-Eesa/ Member

Judge Sari al-Ass`ad/ Member

Dr. Abdurahamn Ibbdah/ Member

Dr. Mohammad Okla/ Member

Dr. Abdunnasir Abulbasal/ Member

Executive Secretary of the Board/ Dr. Mohammad Al-Khalayleh

 

Decision Number [ Previous | Next ]


Summarized Fatawaa

What is the ruling on fasting?

Fasting in Ramadan is an individual obligation (Fard ‘Ayn) upon every mature, sane Muslim who is capable of fasting.
Fasting can also be recommended (Mustahabb), such as voluntary fasting on Mondays and Thursdays, fasting on the Day of Arafah for those not performing Hajj, and fasting on Ashura.
Fasting can be prohibited (Haram), such as fasting on the two Eid days, the Day of Doubt (Yawm al-Shakk), and the Days of Tashreeq.
Some types of fasting are disliked (Makruh), such as singling out Friday or Saturday for fasting without a specific reason and fasting on the Day of Arafah for a pilgrim.

Is it permissible for a woman to sit with her brothers-in-law?

It is impermissible for a woman to sit with her brothers-in-law, and it is also impermissible for a person to have a Khulwa (seclusion) with his sister-in-law.

Is my husband entitled to take my salary?

Your salary is yours, and you may give some of it to him as a kind of free-will contribution.

What is the ruling on offering a sheep as a sacrifice (Udhiyah) if its fat-tail is sound, except that when it was young, the tip of its fat-tail was cut so that it would grow larger? And what is the ruling in case of doubt regarding the amount that was cut?

 
In the Name of Allah, and may peace and blessings be upon our Master, the Messenger of Allah.
 
Cutting a minor, insignificant portion from the tip of an animal's fat-tail (al-alyah) to encourage it to grow larger is not considered a defect, and it does not prevent the animal from being valid for sacrifice (Udhiyah).
 
It is stated in Tuhfat al-Muhtaj (Vol.9/P.352): "There is some scholarly deliberation regarding the common practice of cutting the tip of the fat-tail so that it grows larger. It could potentially be likened to a partial cut of the ear—supported by the jurists' general rule: 'even if it is a small amount.' On the other hand, if it is an exceptionally minor cut, it might have no effect on validity. This is explicitly clarified by the juristic exception to the general rule, which states that cutting a tiny piece from a large limb causes no harm. This latter view is more well-founded.
 
Furthermore, I found that some scholars investigated this matter and concluded: 'It should not affect validity if a custom-sanctioned portion of its fat-tail is removed during its youth to make it grow larger and look better, just as castrating a male animal causes no harm.' However, applying this unconditionally contradicts the established texts of the jurists, as understood from what I have laid out; thus, the restriction I specified is what must be relied upon."
 
Similarly, it is mentioned in Nihayat al-Muhtaj (8/135): "If a small piece is cut from the fat-tail to help it grow larger, the most well-founded view is that the sacrifice remains valid, as was given in a formal legal verdict (Fatwa) by my father [Shihab al-Din al-Ramli], may Allah be pleased with him. This is proven by the jurists' maxim: 'The loss of a tiny piece from a large limb causes no harm.'"
 
In cases where there is doubt as to whether the portion cut was large or small, the animal is still deemed valid for sacrifice. It is noted in Hashiyat al-Shubramallisi ‘ala Nihayat al-Muhtaj (Vol.8/P.135):
 
"This matter requires careful consideration, but the closer and more correct view is that it is valid. This is because soundness is the default state for the animal from which the piece was cut, and it aligns with what usually occurs—namely, that the part removed to help the fat-tail grow larger is naturally very small." And Allah the Almighty Knows Best.

See More