Articles

Competence and Merit are Fundamental Criteria for Appointments
Author : Dr. Mufti AbdulHakim Tawfeeq
Date Added : 23-10-2024

Competence and Merit are Fundamental Criteria for Appointments

 

Introduction

Praise be to Allah, the Lord of the worlds, and blessings and peace be upon the one after whom there is no prophet.

His Majesty King Abdullah II of Jordan released the sixth discussion paper on October 11, 2016, which focuses on the rule of law. This paper includes several topics, all of which establish the principle of the rule of law as a foundation for a civil state. Among the issues discussed in this paper is the principle of merit and the importance of adhering to it in matters of employment. His Majesty stated: "It is essential to adhere to the principle of competence and merit as the fundamental and sole criterion for appointments."

So, what is the meaning of merit, its ruling, its evidence, the benefits of adopting merit, and the consequences of disregarding this standard?

Definition of Merit

Linguistically, "merit" refers to worthiness [1].

Technically, merit refers to "a set of personal attributes in an individual, including professional competence, administrative efficiency, and other qualities that are left to the discretion of the administration [2]." The deserving person is the one who is "most suited for a task and best able to fulfill its requirements [3]."

Article 41, Paragraph (A) of the Jordanian Civil Service Regulation [4] states: "Appointments in civil service positions are made according to the needs approved in job formation tables to ensure the employment of the best competencies based on merit and qualifications."

Ruling on Appointments Based on Merit and Qualifications

It is a religious obligation. Al-Shatibi [5] said: "The grand or minor leadership positions must be entrusted only to those who meet the required conditions, not to just anyone. All other positions follow this principle; the Sharia law demands that these roles be given only to those qualified to perform them." If someone unqualified is appointed, the appointment is invalid. Ibn Abidin [6] mentioned: "If the ruler appoints a teacher who is not qualified, the appointment is invalid. Therefore, it is obligatory for those in charge to appoint suitable individuals to these positions and remove them from those who are not qualified."

Evidences Supporting the Appointment of Qualified Individuals

Evidence for appointing competent individuals can be derived from the Qur'an, the Sunna, the traditions of the Companions, and rational reasoning, as follows:

1- From the Qur'an: Allah Says (What means): "One of the women said, 'O my father, hire him. Indeed, the best one you can hire is the strong and the trustworthy." [Al-Qasas/26]. Al-Nasafi [7] comments that the use of the past tense in "hired" indicates that his strength and trustworthiness were well-established. The phrase "the strong and the trustworthy" is comprehensive, as when these two qualities are combined in the person managing your affairs, your concerns will be relieved, and your goals will be fulfilled.

2- From the Sunna: The Prophet (PBUH) said to Abu Dharr when he asked to be employed: "O Abu Dharr, you are weak, and it is an Amanah (trust), and on the Day of Judgment, it will be a cause of shame and regret, except for those who take it with its due right and fulfill their responsibilities [8]." Al-Nawawi [9] explains that this hadith is a significant principle in avoiding positions of authority, especially for those unable to fulfill their duties. Even though Abu Dharr was trustworthy, the role requires a combination of strength and trustworthiness to be adequately fulfilled.

3- From the Traditions of the Companions: Umar Ibn Al-Khattab (May Allah Be Pleased with him) said: "O people, I have been appointed over you, and if I did not hope to be the best among you, the most capable of handling your affairs, and the most able to bear the weight of your concerns, I would not have accepted this role [10]." Commenting on this, Al-Aqqad [11] noted that the most deserving person to lead is the one most capable of performing the duties of leadership, not merely someone with the right to govern.

Achieving Goals and Interests: Appointing the most qualified individuals is essential for achieving the required objectives in governance and public service. Ibn Taymiyyah stated: "Knowing who is most suitable for the position depends on knowing the purpose of the role and the means to achieve it. The essential goal of leadership positions is to preserve religion and manage worldly affairs in a way that upholds the religion. Therefore, the person who meets the qualifications for the public office must be chosen [13]."

Benefits of Adopting Merit and Qualifications

The success of any administration in implementing its policies largely depends on how well it selects qualified, trustworthy employees and appoints them to positions that match their abilities, qualifications, and readiness [14]. This leads to the following benefits:

1- Improved performance, higher standards, and increased productivity [15]: Relying on merit and qualifications has a significant positive impact on the efficiency of civil service, as it ensures that positions are filled with employees who can perform their duties competently and effectively [16].

2- More effective achievement of goals and completion of tasks with higher quality and lower cost, both in production and in workforce development and training [17].

Consequences of Ignoring the Merit Criterion

Some scholars from the past have recognized the importance of relying on merit and the negative consequences of neglecting it. Among them is Al-Mawardi in his book [Advice to Kings pp.18] where he said: "The king should strive to select his officials—whether ministers, scribes, judges, or governors—from people of religion, reason, trustworthiness, competence, and independence. If a person lacks trust, he will betray. If betrayal occurs in such matters, it may lead to widespread harm or deep-rooted corruption. If a person lacks competence for the responsibilities assigned to him, the work will fall apart and scatter."

Therefore, some of the disadvantages of ignoring the merit criterion can be summarized as follows:

First: Leading to administrative corruption due to the poor selection of employees [19].

Second: Causing unjust equality between a competent employee and an incompetent one [20].

Third: Killing ambition and initiative in the hearts of outstanding employees and weakening their enthusiasm for work [21].

In conclusion, the good or poor selection and appointment of state employees—through applying or ignoring the merit and qualifications standard—directly impacts the state's reputation, dignity, and respect both locally and internationally. As "the public servant is the state's tool and true representation, and people see the state through him [22]."

Our last prayer is that praise be to Allah, The Lord of The Worlds.

 

References:

 [1] Check: Al-Fayrouzabadi, Al-Qamus Al-Muheet, Chapter of Ra, Section of Jeem, Word (J-D-R).

[2] Habish, Fawzi, The Public Employee – His Rights and Duties, p. 87, The Arab Organization for Administrative Sciences, League of Arab States.

[3] Al-Mawardi, Abu Al-Hasan Ali bin Muhammad bin Habib (1983). Advice to Kings (Edited by Khidr Muhammad Khidr), 1st ed., p. 187, Al-Falah Library, Kuwait.

[4] Law No. (82) of 2013 and its amendments up to 1/5/2017.

[5] Al-Muwafaqat, 1st ed., Dar Al-Kutub Al-Ilmiyya, p. 104.

[6] Hashiyat Ibn Abidin, 1st ed., Dar Ihyaa Al-Turath Al-Arabi, vol. 6, p. 266.

[7] Tafsir Al-Nasafi, vol. 3, p. 233, Dar Al-Fikr.

[8] Narrated by Muslim in Sahih Muslim, Book of Governance, Chapter on the Dislike of Leadership Without Necessity, Hadith 1825.

[9] Sahih Muslim with Commentary by Al-Nawawi, vol. 2, p. 166, Dar Al-Fikr.

[10] Al-Aqqad, Abbas, The Genius of Umar, p. 108, Jordanian Family Library, Jordanian Ministry of Culture.

[11] Ibid.

[12] Islamic Governance in Reforming the Ruler and the Ruled, p. 139, 1st ed., Dar Ibn Al-Haytham, Cairo.

[13] Abu Hajir, Majid Mahmoud Saeed, The Rules of Islamic Governance in Appointing State Employees in Islam, p. 82, Dar Al-Thaqafa, Amman.

[14] Habish, Fawzi, Public Employment and Personnel Management (262), p. 81, The Arab Organization for Administrative Sciences, League of Arab States.

[15] Ibid, p. 87.

[16] Ammar, Husni Hassan, Personnel Management, Institute of Public Administration, Saudi Arabia, p. 175.

[17] Yaghi, Dr. Muhammad Abdul Fattah, Ethics in Public Administration, p. 258, No Edition.

[18] Edited by Khidr Muhammad Khidr, 1st ed., Al-Falah Library, Kuwait, p. 187.

[21] Ibid.

[22] Jaafar, Dr. Muhammad Anas Qasim, Fundamental Principles of Public Employment in Islam, Dar Al-Nahda Al-Arabiya, Cairo, p. 13.

 

هذا المقال يعبر عن رأي كاتبه، ولا يعبر بالضرورة عن رأي دائرة الإفتاء العام

Article Number [ Previous | Next ]

Read for Author




Comments


Captcha


Warning: this window is not dedicated to receive religious questions, but to comment on topics published for the benefit of the site administrators—and not for publication. We are pleased to receive religious questions in the section "Send Your Question". So we apologize to readers for not answering any questions through this window of "Comments" for the sake of work organization. Thank you.




Summarized Fatawaa

My husband wanted to sell a piece of land that was his own, but his father insisted that he transfer the land in his (the father’s) name so that he could sell it at a higher price. Then, my husband and his father would split the price. After my father-in-law sold the land, he denied everything and refused to acknowledge my husband’s right. My father-in-law passed away a year ago, and my husband’s brothers divided the inheritance, refusing to acknowledge that this land was a trust held by their father for my husband until it was sold. Are they sinful for knowingly denying that the land belongs to my husband, and what is the ruling on praying against them?
 
 
 
 
 

All perfect praise be to Alalh, The Lord of The Worlds, and may His Peace and Blessings be upon our Prophet Muhammad and upon all of his family and companions.
Among the rights of the deceased upon their heirs are: preparing them for burial at death, settling their debts, returning people’s rights to them, executing their will, and then dividing their estate. What was mentioned in the question falls under the rights of others, even if they are among the heirs, and the deceased is not absolved of it unless it is returned to its rightful owners. This is because Allah, Almighty, forbids consuming others' wealth/properties unjustly. However, do not give up on seeking a solution by involving righteous and well - respected individuals who may have influence over them, in the hope that Allah guides them to goodness and correctness. As for supplicating against them, the prayer of the oppressed is not rejected, even if the oppressed person is not a Muslim. And Allah knows best.
 
 
 
 
 

Is it permissible for a person who had vowed to give a certain amount of money to another, but didn`t find the latter to donate that money to the mosque?

In principle, the vowing person should abide by his vow as much as possible. Therefore, if he couldn`t find the person that he had made the vow for, then the vow itself is countless and nothing is due on its maker. However, if the latter happens to find the former later on then, he has to give him that money.

What is the ruling on performing voluntary prayers during official working hours?

All perfect praise be to Allah, The Lord of The Worlds, and may His Peace and Blessings be upon our Prophet Muhammad and upon all of his family and companions

There is no harm if  there was break time during official working hours, but if not then it is impermissible. And Allah Knows Best.

I have concluded my marriage contract at a Sharia court; however, one day I was talking to my fiancée over the phone and she got on my nerves leading me to utter one divorce. This is knowing that I can`t tell my her father because he is very strict and will not accept that at all. What is the best course of action that I should pursue in this situation?

All perfect praise be to Allah the Lord of the Worlds. May His peace and blessings be upon Prophet Mohammad and upon all his family and companions.
When divorce takes place before the consummation of marriage it is called Ba`in divorce* (Minor irrevocable divoce), so your wife is considered unlawful to you until you conduct a new marriage contract and pay Mahr* , and you should visit the Iftaa` Department in order to know the correct Fatwa. And Allah The Almighty Knows Best.

* Minor irrevocable divorce Talaq Al-Ba'in Binona Soghra: It is a divorce where the husband cannot take his ex-wife back unless with her consent, conducting a new marriage contract and paying new bridal wealth Mahr.

* In Islam, a Mahr is the obligation, in the form of money or possessions paid by the groom, to the bride at the time of Islamic marriage. While the Mahr is often money, it can also be anything agreed upon by the bride such as jewelry, home goods, furniture, a dwelling or some land.